Case summary: The company J has 250 workers in it. Few employees started an employee’s union known as JEU. J denied to recognize such union to which employees petitioned in National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) for election. Later in June, NLRB conducted the election with a result that almost all the employees were in favor to create a union. NLRB certified the union JEU. At later stage some differences arose between J and JEU members regarding wages and benefits of the employees. A new union was elected which was not able to work properly due to the lack of support and some employees went on strike without union support.
To find: Number of employees required to sign the petition for union election.
Explanation of Solution
When an employer refuses to recognize the union, the union members can present authorization cards to the NLRB showing that 30% of the employees support a union or an election. NLRB after checking the veracity of the petition can conduct a union election under its guidance. Therefore, in the above case, minimum 75 employees must have signed the petition to seek an approval from NLRB to conduct the elections.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 22 Solutions
Lms Integrated Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card Cross/miller’s The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th
- World Color operated a printing plant. a written policy stated: “Baseball caps are prohibited except for [world Color] baseball caps.” The policy permitted employees to accessorize their uniforms “in good taste and in accordance with all safety rules.” The Graphic Communications Conference of the international Brotherhood of Teamsters filed an unfair labor practice charge with the NLRB claiming that the policy prohibited employees from wearing union insignia at work. it said world Color was interfering with its employees’ “right to self-organization, to form, join, or assist labor organizations, . . . and to engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining” as guaranteed by federal law. The NLRB agreed and world Color appealed. Was the baseball cap policy an unfair labor practice?arrow_forwardMark Young is the head of the painting department in a large hospital; 20 union employees report to him. Before coming on board at the hospital, he had worked as an independent contractor. At the hospital, he took a position that was newly created because the hospital believed change was needed in how painting services were provided. Upon beginning his job, Mark did a 4-month analysis of the direct and indirect costs of painting services. His findings supported the perceptions of his administrators that painting services were inefficient and costly. As a result, Mark completely reorganized the department, designed a new scheduling procedure, and redefined the expected standards of performance. Mark says that when he started out in his new job he was “all task,” like a drill sergeant who didn’t seek any input from his subordinates. From Mark’s point of view, the hospital environment did not leave much room for errors, so he needed to be strict about getting painters to do a good job…arrow_forwardKofi and Ama are both colleagues in an organization working in the Finance and Marketing department respectively. Ama sent an email to Kofi indicating the annual budget for securing funds for sales and advertising campaign by the Marketing Unit.Kofi replied to the email stating that the budget provided by Ama cannot be met. Ama, declined to reply to the email and then started accusing Kofi in the midst of other workers the next day.Use the above scenario to answer the following questions: a) Identify and explain within the context of the above scenario the basic steps to effective communication which was adopted by Ama in communicating with Kofi.b) Do you think Ama is right for accusing Kofi for his reply? Justify your answerarrow_forward
- Alice, an employee of ABC Incorporation, was warned several times about her excessive absenteeism both verbally and in written as well. The last written warning included notice that further violations will result in serious disciplinary actions that includes suspension or discharge. A short time after the written warning was issued, Alice called work to say she was not going to be in because her babysitter is sick and she had to stay home and care for her young child. Alice's supervisor, Martin, told her that she had already exceeded the allowed number of absences and warned that if she did not report to work, she could be suspended. When Alice did not report for her shift, Martin suspended her for ten days. In a subsequent hearing, Alice argued that it was not her fault that the babysitter had cancelled and protested that she had no other choice but to stay home. Martin pointed out that Alice had not made a good effort to find an alternate babysitter nor had she tried to swap shifts…arrow_forwardA Board of directors had been experiencing a growing divide between its members for some months and one of the directors sought legal advice independently regarding a possible case for harassment and bullying. The Board's solicitor had been trying to steer them through this difficult period but advised that proceedings were imminent and that urgent action needed to be taken to protect the organisation. The remaining members of the board were unable to agree on a way forward and the director who threatened to sue continued to attend meetings so that they became completely ineffective. They became anxious about speaking on the record and were reluctant to permeated every The Board's solicitor suggested mediation, reminding the Board of their obligation to run the organisation as effectively as possible and that mediation is something the Charity Commission favours. tackle the obvious conflict that meeting. The two solicitors agreed to appoint a mediator and the board members engaged in a…arrow_forwardn employee was terminated for smoking in a no smoking area. The union claimed that he should be reinstated because the company failed to follow due rocess procedures. When the company and the union could not agree, this case was referred to arbitration and the arbitrator ruled in favor of the employee. How should the company respond? our Response The company should reinstate the employee and follow due process in the future. The company should appeal the case to the district court. The company should request a hearing by a three-member panel of administrative law judges. The company should appeal the case to the NLRB. Feedbackarrow_forward
- While mingling with neighbours at a party, While mingling with neighbours at a party, Tyler mentions that he is responsible for evaluating bids for a large computer software contract. A few days later, Tyler receives a lunch invitation from one of his neighbours who also attended the party. Over appetizers, the conversation turns to the contract Tyler is managing. Tyler’s neighbour seems remarkably well informed about the bidding process and likely bidders. Tyler volunteers information about the potential value of the contract and briefly outlines the criteria his firm will use to select the winner. At the end of the lunch, Tyler’s neighbour surprises him by revealing that he is a consultant for several companies in the computer software market. Later that day, Tyler’s mind is racing. Did Tyler reveal information that could provide a supplier with a competitive advantage in the bidding process? What are the potential business risks and ethical issues in this situation? Should Tyler…arrow_forwardWhile mingling with neighbours at a party, Ato mentions that he is responsible for evaluating bids for a large computer software contract. A few days later, Ato receives a lunch invitation from one of his neighbours who also attended the party. Over appetizers, the conversation turns to the contract Ato is managing. Ato's neighbor seems remarkably well informed about the bidding process and likely bidders. Ato volunteers information about the potential value of the contract and briefly outlines the criteria his firm will use to select the winner. At the end of the lunch, Ato's neighbor surprises him by revealing that he is a consultant for several companies in the computer software market. Later that day, Ato's mind is racing. Question1 Did Ato reveal information that could provide a supplier with a 1.competitive advantage in the bidding process? 2. What are the potential business risks and ethical issues in this situation? 3.Should Ato report the conversation to someone? If so, whom…arrow_forwardA group of employees has gone on strike against their employer after an impasse in contract negotiations has been reached. The employees went on strike in order to support their position in negotiations for higher wages. Right after the strike began, management decided to fire two employees who were viewed as pushing the employees to approve the strike. The management then hired permanent strike replacements for the remainder of the workers. What type of strike is this and why? Based on this, was the employer's decision to hire permanent replacements legal or illegal, and why?arrow_forward
- An employment contract explains the terms of employment relationship for both employee and employer. Employment contracts: are regulated by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. cover a very small percentage of the workforce. are always negotiated individually. waive employee rights to due process.arrow_forwardSue is a fifty-five year old employee of company A. Her children are out of college and her parents have both died. Company A offers a child care program to all employees along with an elder care program. However, Sue, like many other employees, has no need for these services, neither now or in the future. Should the firm retain these programs? Should alternative benefits for employees who have no use for such services be offered?arrow_forwardA property manager tells Marisa, who is Afro- Latina, that no apartments are available in an apartment complex. Marisa wonders if she has been discriminated against on the basis of her race. She asks her partner, who is white, to apply for the unit. Her partner's application is accepted. Marisa decides to file a discrimination complaint with HUD. How long does she have from the time of the violation to file? Marisa has one year to file with HUD. Marisa has six months to file with HUD. Marisa has 90 days to file with HUD. If she also wants to file a civil lawsuit, however, she has two years. Marisa has two years to file with HUD. However, it is unlikely that HUD will take the case since property managers are not coveredarrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education