Lms Integrated Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card Cross/miller’s The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337093897
Author: Frank B. Cross, Roger LeRoy Miller
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 21, Problem 4CT
Summary Introduction
Case summary: Person T filed a lawsuit against person M on the grounds of sexual harassment at workplace under title VII of Civil Rights Act. The court decides in favor of T. M appealed against the decision of the court.
To find: Reversal of judgement on the basis of contradictory evidence.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Ben's Bar ("Ben's") is a popular restaurant chain with thousands of employees throughout the United
States. Ben's hires only women to fill its bartender positions. A man who did not get hired for a
bartender position at Ben's is now claiming that he was discriminated against based on sex; the man
sues Ben's. Ben's attorney argues the Bona Fide Occupational Defense. Is this defense likely to
work?
OYes, if Ben's can prove a customer preference for the female workers.
O Yes, because it meets the "Essence of the Business" test.
O Yes, because it meets the "All or Substantially All" test.
No, because neither test is met, and no other basis for a defense has been presented.
O Yes, so long as Ben's is a private company.
You have likely heard of the Liebeck v. McDonalds case. Liebeck spilled hot McDonald's coffee in her lap, suffering third degree burns. At trial, evidence showed that her cup of coffee was brewed at 190 degrees, and that, more typically, a restaurant's "hot coffee" is in the range of 140-160 degrees. A jury awarded Liebeck $160,000 in compensatory damages and $2.7 million in punitive damages. The judge reduced the punitive award to $480,000, or three times the compensatory award.
Comment on the case, and whether the result was reasonable.
If a person was found guilty for assault and battery in a criminal case, and the person that was hurt brings a civil action against the defendant, does a full trial have to be held again or can the jury just accept the fact that the defendant committed the act?
Chapter 21 Solutions
Lms Integrated Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card Cross/miller’s The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- What are the factors which will allow a court to pierce the corporate veil?arrow_forwardIs Nurse Jones' disclosure to Paris Lights of Terrence's condition permitted and required by stateor federal law?arrow_forwardThe different degree of reliance on oral evidence by witnesses somehow differentiate the culture of evidence-raising in civil law and common law jurisdictions. In your view, if a witness already provided written testimony, is it still necessary to summon each of them to provide oral evidence?arrow_forward
- Patrick Clawson was described by reporter Karen Branch-Brioso in a newspaper story as a “1970s era St. Louis journalist turned private eye turned FBI informant.” The story was published in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. The fact that he had been characterized as an informant bothered Clawson, who saw it as damaging to his reputation. Accordingly, he brought a libel case against the Post-Dispatch. Recall that to be libelous, a statement must be false and “hold the victim up to ridicule, contempt, or hatred.” Clawson would have preferred the term whistleblower rather than informant because that term commands more respect. Why is the use of the term informant to describe Clawson not libelous?arrow_forwardCatherine Bosley worked as a television news anchor for WKBN Channel 27 in Youngstown, Ohio. While on vacation with her husband in Florida she participated in a “wet t-shirt” contest, which was videotaped without her consent by DreamGirls, Inc. and licensed to Marvad Corp., which runs a Web site for adult entertainment through a subscription service on the Internet. Marvad used depictions of her in advertisements to promote the materials and services it markets. Web site searches related to Catherine Bosley in 2004 were the most popular search on the World Wide Web. Due to the publicity, she resigned from her position at WKBN. Bosley sought an injunction against the defendants from using her image in any manner that promotes the sale of their goods or services. The defendants contend that an injunction would violate their First Amendment rights. [Bosley v. Wildwett.com, 310 F. Supp. 2d 914 (N.D. Ohio)] 2.2. ) Provide a paragraph with more than five sentences (i.e., in the section for…arrow_forward20-2. Wrongful Discharge. Denton and Carlo were employed at an appliance plant. Their joh required them to perform osional maintenance worlk while standing on a wire mesh twenty feet above the plant floor. Ocher employ es kad fallen through the meih, and one of them had been killal by the fall. When their supervisor told them tw perform tasks that would lilkely involve walking on the mesh, Denton and Carlo refused because they feared chey might suffer bodily injury or death. Recause they reflised w do tle rcquested work, the two employees were fired from their jobs, Was their discharge wrongful? If so, usder whar federal employment law? Ta whar federal gency ot dkpurtment should they rurn for assistance? (See fimplayment as WAN.)arrow_forward
- 5-3 PROXIMATE CAUSE. Galen Stoller was killed at a railroad crossing when a train hit his car. The crossing was marked with a stop sign and a railroad-crossing symbol. The sign was not obstructed by vegetation, but there were no flashing lights. Galen’s parents filed a suit against Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad Corp. The plaintiffs accused the defendant of negligence in the design and maintenance of the crossing. The defendant argued that Galen had not stopped at the stop sign. Was the railroad negligent? What was the proximate cause of the accident? Discuss. [Henderson v. National Railroad Passenger Corp., __ F.3d __ (10th Cir. 2011)] (See Negligence.)arrow_forwardPlease no written by hand and no emage Silky Coordinates", a women's clothing store, employs female attendants to assist customers in the dressing rooms. Radley, 41 year old male, applies for the job , but is not hired and is told that only woman qualify. If Radley brings a suit against "Silky" for employment discrimination under Title VII, what is the store's best defense? For the purposes of this question you may assume that Radley has information that makes it possible to prove he was not hired because he is a male. You may also assume that Radley is not transgendered, or gender fluid. Now consider that Radley is a transgender person, who identities as a female, and is in the process completing a physical change to a female. However, anatomically she is a male. Again, you may assume that Radley has information that makes it possible to prove she was not hired because she is transgendered. Does the store have a defense to a discrimination suit? To answer this question you will have…arrow_forwardTrue or False 1. According to the employment at will principle, employers may dismiss their employees whenever they desire, for good or no cause, even for morally wrong causes. 2. Discrimination in employment must involve a decision against employees that is not based on individual merit. 3. Institutional discrimination is discrimination that is the result of the actions of all or many people in an institution and of their routine processes and policies.arrow_forward
- A machine operator employee with a major depressive disorder intermittently takes leaves under the Family and Medical Leave Act, resulting in alleged harassment by her employer surrounding her FMLA usage as well as a transfer to various difficult machines after her return from leave. Two months after her last FMLA leave, she is terminated for “improper phone usage.” [Hite v. Vermeer Mfg. Co., 361 F. Supp. 2d 935 (S.D. Iowa, 2005).] explaining your conclusion regarding whether the scenario constitutes a violation of public policy or a breach of a covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Support your conclusion with legal analysis and reasoning. Explain whether any of the scenarios give rise to potential employer liability and what steps should have been taken to avoid the exposure.arrow_forwardBill Kinsey was charged with murdering his wife while working for the Peace Corps in Tanzania. After waiting six months in jail, he was acquitted at a trial that attracted wide publicity. Five years later, while a graduate student at Stanford University, Kinsey had a brief affair with Mary Macur. He abruptly ended the affair by telling Macur he would no longer be seeing her because another woman, Sally Allen, was coming from England to live with him. A few months later, Kinsey and Allen moved to Africa and were subsequently married. Soon after Bill ended their affair, Macur began a letter-writing campaign designed to expose Bill and his mistreatment of her. Macur sent several letters to both Bill and Sally Kinsey, their parents, their neighbors, their parents’ neighbors, members of Bill’s dissertation committee, other faculty, and the president of Stanford University. The letters contained statements accusing Bill of murdering his first wife, spending six months in jail for the crime,…arrow_forwardElizabeth is out with her friends at a bar one night. The bartender notices someone slip a pill into Elizabeth’s drink. If Elizabeth commits a crime later that night, the bartender can best testify on her behalf. Which defense most likely applies to this situation? (Whether or not the defense will work is not relevant.) A. Duress B. Involuntary Intoxication C. Mistake of Factarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education