GO Figure 22-40 shows a proton (р) on the central axis through a disk with a uniform charge density due to excess electrons. The disk is seen from an edge-on view. Three of those electrons are shown: electron e c at the disk center and electrons e s at opposite sides of the disk, at radius R from the center. The proton is initially at distance z = R = 2.00 cm from the disk. At that location, what are the magnitudes of (a) the electric field E c → due to electron e c and (b) the net electric field E → s , net due to electrons e s ? The proton is then moved to z = R /10.0. What then are the magnitudes of (с) E c → and (d) E → s , net at the proton's location? (e) From (a) and (c) we see that as the proton gets nearer to the disk, the magnitude of E c → increases, as expected. Why does the magnitude of E → s , net from the two side electrons decrease, as we see from (b) and (d)? Figure 22-40 Problem 13.
GO Figure 22-40 shows a proton (р) on the central axis through a disk with a uniform charge density due to excess electrons. The disk is seen from an edge-on view. Three of those electrons are shown: electron e c at the disk center and electrons e s at opposite sides of the disk, at radius R from the center. The proton is initially at distance z = R = 2.00 cm from the disk. At that location, what are the magnitudes of (a) the electric field E c → due to electron e c and (b) the net electric field E → s , net due to electrons e s ? The proton is then moved to z = R /10.0. What then are the magnitudes of (с) E c → and (d) E → s , net at the proton's location? (e) From (a) and (c) we see that as the proton gets nearer to the disk, the magnitude of E c → increases, as expected. Why does the magnitude of E → s , net from the two side electrons decrease, as we see from (b) and (d)? Figure 22-40 Problem 13.
GO Figure 22-40 shows a proton (р) on the central axis through a disk with a uniform charge density due to excess electrons. The disk is seen from an edge-on view. Three of those electrons are shown: electron ec at the disk center and electrons es at opposite sides of the disk, at radius R from the center. The proton is initially at distance z = R = 2.00 cm from the disk. At that location, what are the magnitudes of (a) the electric field
E
c
→
due to electron ec and (b) the net electric field
E
→
s
,
net
due to electrons es? The proton is then moved to z = R/10.0. What then are the magnitudes of (с)
E
c
→
and (d)
E
→
s
,
net
at the proton's location? (e) From (a) and (c) we see that as the proton gets nearer to the disk, the magnitude of
E
c
→
increases, as expected. Why does the magnitude of
E
→
s
,
net
from the two side electrons decrease, as we see from (b) and (d)?
Imagine you are out for a stroll on a sunny day when you encounter a lake. Unpolarized light from the sun is reflected off the lake into your eyes. However, you notice when you put on your vertically polarized sunglasses, the light reflected off the lake no longer reaches your eyes. What is the angle between the unpolarized light and the surface of the water, in degrees, measured from the horizontal? You may assume the index of refraction of air is nair=1 and the index of refraction of water is nwater=1.33 . Round your answer to three significant figures. Just enter the number, nothing else.
Deduce what overvoltage is like in reversible electrodes.
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, physics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.