Microeconomics
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781260507140
Author: David C. Colander
Publisher: McGraw Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 21, Problem 5QE
To determine
One rule of thumb and the violation of rationality assumption.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
The law of diminishing marginal utility is consistent with the fact that people trade. Do you agree or disagree? Explain your answer.
In economics, we assume that choices are based on desired outcomes. This concept is
known as:
Do you think the model of consumer equilibrium describes how people really make the decisions on what to order to in a restaurant to maximize their utility? Is there a better model to measure consumer choice?
Chapter 21 Solutions
Microeconomics
Ch. 21.1 - Prob. 1QCh. 21.1 - Prob. 2QCh. 21.1 - Prob. 3QCh. 21.1 - Prob. 4QCh. 21.1 - Prob. 5QCh. 21.1 - Prob. 6QCh. 21.1 - Prob. 7QCh. 21.1 - Prob. 8QCh. 21.1 - Prob. 9QCh. 21.1 - Prob. 10Q
Ch. 21 - Prob. 1QECh. 21 - Prob. 2QECh. 21 - Prob. 3QECh. 21 - Prob. 4QECh. 21 - Prob. 5QECh. 21 - Prob. 6QECh. 21 - Prob. 7QECh. 21 - Prob. 8QECh. 21 - Prob. 9QECh. 21 - Prob. 10QECh. 21 - Prob. 11QECh. 21 - Prob. 12QECh. 21 - Prob. 13QECh. 21 - Prob. 14QECh. 21 - Prob. 15QECh. 21 - Prob. 16QECh. 21 - Prob. 17QECh. 21 - Prob. 18QECh. 21 - Prob. 19QECh. 21 - Prob. 1QAPCh. 21 - Prob. 2QAPCh. 21 - Prob. 3QAPCh. 21 - Prob. 4QAPCh. 21 - Prob. 5QAPCh. 21 - Prob. 1IPCh. 21 - Prob. 2IPCh. 21 - Prob. 3IPCh. 21 - Prob. 4IPCh. 21 - Prob. 5IPCh. 21 - Prob. 6IP
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- am. 111.arrow_forwardIf the price of restaurant meals is overall higher in big cities then you might expect young people in those cities to spend more on those meals as a percent of their income than similar people in the suburbs. The answer must then lie with the preferences of those young people with their utility curves. Do you think that people reveal their preferences in part by where they choose to live?arrow_forwardwhat are some keypoints about behavioral economics?arrow_forward
- Peer pressure is an important influence on the behavior of youngsters. For instance, many preteens begin smoking because their friends pressure them into being “cool” by smoking. Using utility theory, how would you explain peer pressure? How would this compare with the explanations provided by behavioral economics and neuroeconomics?arrow_forwardTomas buys a hamburger that doesn't taste very good. He can't return the hamburger and get his money back. Tomas decides to eat the hamburger even though it doesn't taste very good because he doesn't want to "lose the money" he paid for the hamburger. Which of the following statements are true about this situation? Check all that apply. Tomas may end up making himself worse off by eating the hamburger than by not eating the hamburger. Tomas cannot get back the money he paid for the hamburger, and so eating the hamburger doesn't really prevent him from losing the money he paid for the hamburger. By deciding to eat the hamburger, Tomas is committing the sunk cost fallacy.arrow_forwardWhy do economists use the ceteris paribus assumption?arrow_forward
- Q. 4 Economists suggest that common people consciously equate marginal utility with price as they are shopping for groceries, but I don't think anyone else but economists may do this and I suspect even they slip up. It is ridiculous to describe consumer behavior in terms of a theory that consumers have never even heard of. Humans are not super calculators. Many times people buy things on a whim. For example, I buy chewing gum at the checkout counter and it is not on my original list of items to purchase. Discuss Is the Homo Economicus assumption, that is, humans have the super-cognitive ability, are super-rational, and possess full information of all relevant costs, tradeoffs, budget available, and consequences, a reasonable assumption, or is there some other psychological model of consumer behavior that seem s more reasonable and explain observed human behavior well.arrow_forwardJoab and his friends used to play a game where they put on a dog's electric fence collar and tried to stand over the electric fence line because, after careful consideration of the costs and benefits, they decided that the benefits of watching their friends get shocked outweighed the costs of being shocked themselves. According to the economic way of thinking, by playing this game, Joab and his friends were O not responding to the incentives they faced. making an irrational choice. making a rational choice. not fully considering the costs and benefits of their decision since this is obviously a mistake for anybody to do.arrow_forwardThis is an economics-based multiple-choice question... Which of the following facts could not be explained by path-dependence? (choose one) A) Sue lives in the city in which she was born. B) Maria likes to cook the dishes her mother used to cook. C) Vanessa is the first person in her family to go to college. D) Ahmed has played piano since he was four years old.arrow_forward
- Critically discuss whether maximising behaviour or satisficing behaviour is the best way to explain consumer behaviourarrow_forwardWe learned that we can use choice between a gamble over someone's best and worst outcomes and getting an outcome of interest (like getting pizza) for certain as a way to assign numeric values to utility (on a scale of 0 to 1). Using this method, if you are indifferent between the following: A gamble that has a 0.3 chance of your best possible outcome (and no lower chance), and a 0.7 chance of your worst possible outcome. Getting pizza for certain. it means that your utility for getting pizza is:arrow_forwardRevealed Preference is when an individual's behavior reveals information about a person's tastes and preferences,i.e. what he likes and dislikes and how much he likes or dislikes a good. The individual demand schedule and an individual's demand curve reveals a person's tastes and preferences for a good. Specifically it reveals how much each successive unit of the good he consumes is worth to him. We can say this differently by saying the maximum price a person is willing to pay for a particular unit of the good is how much that unit of the good is worth to him. This value is revealed by his behavior or his willingness to voluntarily give a certain amount of money in exchange for that unit of the good. In other words, how many units of a good a person demands/buys at any given price. Look at the image.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
- Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506893
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506725
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning