Case summary: The company W employed a woman A for making detailed notes of the discussion for the script writing. During the meetings, three of the scriptwriters made obscene and vulgar jokes and showcased sexual gestures, but W never complained about it. They also conversated about their personal sexual fantasies and experience to further use it in story. Sometime later, A lost her job and filed a lawsuit against the company W alleging that her termination was a result of racial discrimination.
To find: The type of A’s claim of discrimination.
Explanation of Solution
Title VII of Civil Rights Act forbids any kind of discrimination, intentional and unintentional, at the workplace. In a case of intentional discrimination, the person must show a prima facie case of discrimination by the employer to the Court while unintentional discrimination can be inferred from the practices and procedures of the employer.
In the given case as A does not have enough evidence to prove intentional discrimination as she was not discriminated at any stage, she can bring her claim under unintentional discrimination.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 21 Solutions
EBK THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS:
- Julian is a salesman for Frostee's Ice Cream Company, and he arranges a meeting with a local ice cream store to sell the company's flavors. Julian decides to wear a nice T-shirt and a pair of jeans to the meeting to match the dress code of the store. He starts by conversing with the store manager, who oversees the purchase orders for the store, and they begin builpig rapport. Julian then asks the manager questions about what types of ice cream flavors that customers have been requesting, along with what flavors are never available from the other sellers. He listens to the manager's responses and takes mental note of what the store needs to satisfy their customers. Julian has just completed the phase of the selling process. O presentation approach O prospecting O preapproach O closingarrow_forwardMohamed Arafi, a naturalized U.S. citizen from Morocco, works as a valet dry cleaner for the Mandarin Oriental Hotel in Washington, D.C. In December 2010, a supervisor allegedly prohibited Arab or Muslim workers from going on floors occupied by a delegation of Israeli diplomats. The supervisor allegedly told Arafi, “You know how the Israelis are with Arabs and Muslims.” Arafi says he complied with his supervisor’s instructions but consequently lost out on tips. He subsequently complained to another supervisor and the hotel’s director of human resources. Arafi says his work hours were cut, and that his colleagues said demeaning things about Muslims to him after the incident became known to them. Arafi brought suit under Title VII, alleging disparate treatment resulting in an adverse employment action (the loss of tips), as well as retaliation. The Mandarin Hotel claimed a national security exemption. Would either of Arafi’s claims be successful? Would the Hotel’s? [Arafi v. Mandarin…arrow_forwardMaetta Vance, an African American woman, worked at Ball State University as a catering assistant in the University Banquet and Catering Division of Dining Services. Over the course of her employment with Ball State, she lodged numerous complaints of racial discrimination and retaliation. She had a particularly acrimonious relationship with Saundra Davis, a white woman who was employed as a catering specialist in the Banquet and Catering Division. Vance complained that Davis “gave her a hard time at work by glaring at her, slamming pots and pans around her, and intimidating her.” She alleged that she was “left alone in the kitchen with Davis, who smiled at her”; that Davis “blocked” her on an elevator and “stood there with her cart smiling”; and that Davis often gave Vance “weird” looks. Vance filed an EEOC charge and, ultimately, a lawsuit in federal court against Ball State, claiming violations of Title VII for racial harassment. Davis, as a catering specialist, had some leadership…arrow_forward
- Lisa applied and interviewed for a manager position at her company and was not selected. She was not given any feedback from the interview, Tony her male coworker was selected for the position. Lisa felt the promotion was unfair, since she had more seniority than Tony, and decided to file a gender discrimination and play with her local equal opportunity commissioner the EEOC investigated the complaint, and did not find any evidence of discrimination. Both Lisa and Tony’s employment was in good standing however, Tony had passed managerial experience, which was listed as a requirement on the job. This aspect, then made him a strong, stronger candidate for the job than Lisa, who had more seniority, but lacked the experience and the next several months, Lisa noticed the change from her manager prior to the complaint being filled he was very personable towards her and often made small talk around the office. After the complaint he was very short with her, and did not engage in any small…arrow_forwardSonya and other employees of TransGlobal Inc. maintain a password-protected social media page on which they post comments on work-related issues. The posts range from positive to negative, supporting the page’s purpose to “vent about work.” When TransGlobal learns of the page, the company intimidates Sonya into revealing the password, and after reviewing the posts, fires her and the other participants. Which federal law discussed in this chapter most likely applies to this situation? Has this law been violated? Discuss.arrow_forwardKellyMarie Griffin works for the City of Portland, Oregon, as a clerical employee in the Parks and Recreation Department. She complains of conflict with her coworkers. In particular, Therea Lareau, the “lead” clerical employee at the same location, has made comments that are derogatory about or offensive to Griffin’s Christian faith. Ms. Lareau has referred to Griffin as “a wacko” because of her beliefs and, on at least one occasion, told Griffin that God was “a figment of [her] imagin[ation]” and that Griffin was “praying to something that didn’t exist.” Griffin also complains that many of her coworkers frequently page 51-42use “God” and “Jesus Christ” as swear words, which she finds offensive due to her religious beliefs. Griffin, however, admits that when she has informed her coworkers about how the swearing offends her, they have made efforts to avoid doing so in her presence—even Lareau. Despite that, things have deteriorated. Recently, Griffin and Lareau found themselves in a…arrow_forward
- Jaqueline was had been working in Bestworks’ Sdn. Bhd. as an assistant manager since October 2020. In November 2020, Alan became the manager of the department she worked in. Alan was not used to working with female members of staff, and Jaqueline was the only female in the department. Alan began to make suggestive remarks about Jaqueline’s appearance and dress sense. He also asked her to work late at the office and made sexual advances towards her when no one else was in the office premises. Jaqueline complained to the Human Resource Department of the company and they replied saying that she had not made her complaint in the required format according to company employee regulations. No further action has been taken by the company to date. a) With reference to the above scenario, explain the complaints procedure for sexual harassment under the Employment Act 1955. b) Explain how Jaqueline can pursue a claim under the section 20 (1) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967. Your answer must…arrow_forwardUnder the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), employers are prohibited from discriminating against employees on the basis of their age once an employee has reached age 45. Group startsTrue or False True, unselectedFalse, unselectedarrow_forwardBob writes an email to the managing partner of the firm saying "I think we have enough women in the firm now". After receiving this email, the managing partner declines to hire Sally for an open accounting position. This email is considered pretext direct evidence of discrimination not evidence of discrimination circumstancial evidence of discriminationarrow_forward
- Hong, who was born in Vietnam, now lives in Los Angeles. She applies to be a waitress at Hooters. The manager of Hooters restaurant tells her, “Sorry, we rarely hire Asian girls because their breasts are too small and part of the Hooters’ image is waitresses with big breasts”. Does Tran have a valid claim against Hooters under the Civil Rights Act? Explain.arrow_forwardKatie (not her real name) was a manager in a food manufacturing factory. She had a number of health and safety practice concerns around COVID-19. While Katie’s employer had some safety measures in place, she was concerned that the factory had not been effectively cleaned and decontaminated, and several employees had tested positive for COVID-19 and were off work. No senior personnel were on-site for Katie to raise her concerns with. As a result of her concerns and the stress they placed upon her, Katie left work and seek your advice. She wanted to report about lack of responsibility on the part of her previous employer that may cause the spread of Covid-19 at the factory. Advise Katie according to whistleblowing policy.arrow_forwardAn employee at an automotive sales business resigned from her position, claiming that she was forced to resign as the owner incessantly bullied her. The employee alleges that the owner had frequent mood swings and would subject her to abusive behaviour and discriminatory remarks. The owner would also throw tantrums and scream at employees on the show room floor and other public areas, calling them ‘stupid idiots’, ‘useless’ and ‘disgusting’. Identify the specific issue in question and the procedure that needs to be followed in order to resolve the dispute.arrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education