The average wealth.
Explanation of Solution
Table -1 shows the median and average family wealth and survey years from 1995-2010.
Table – 1
Year | Median | Average |
1995 | $84,000 | $307,900 |
1998 | 98,100 | 386,700 |
2001 | 106,100 | 487,000 |
2004 | 107,200 | 517,100 |
2007 | 126,400 | 584,600 |
2010 | 77,300 | 498,800 |
203 | 76,000 | 500,400 |
The average wealth in 1995 can be calculated as follows:
Hence, the average wealth was 3.67 times greater than median wealth in 1995.
The average wealth in 1998 can be calculated as follows.
Hence, the average wealth was 3.94 times greater than median wealth in 1998.
The average wealth in 2001 can be calculated as follows:
Hence, the average wealth was 4.95 times greater than median wealth in 2001.
The average wealth in 2004 can be calculated as follows.
Hence, the average wealth was 4.82 times greater than median wealth in 2004.
The average wealth in 2007 can be calculated as follows:
Hence, the average wealth was 4.63 times greater than median wealth in 2007.
The average wealth in 2010 can be calculated as follows.
Hence, the average wealth was 6.45 times greater than median wealth in 2010.
After 1995, 10% of the top wealthy people have seen an increase in their wealth disproportionately in comparison to the reaming 90%. The reason for this has been higher inequality in income, gains from stock market and tax cut that help the wealthy to increase their wealth.
As we can find a disincentive in work for public assistance, similarly inheritance might have a negative incentive on whosoever receives it. At the same time, people who work hard and save money think that they should have the rights to pass on their wealth to their successors. So, instead of cancelling the tax it’s better to bring changes in the tax. The changes for example can be to increase the limit of the amount of wealth that is allowed to be inherited and then apply an estate tax.
Concept Introduction:
Wealth: It is established by calculating the total market value of all physical and indefinable assets owned by subtracting these with all debts.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 21 Solutions
Economics: Principles, Problems, & Policies (McGraw-Hill Series in Economics) - Standalone book
- Gates Doubles Down on Malaria Eradication The End Malaria Council, convened by Bill Gates and Ray Chambers, seeks to mobilize resources to prevent and treat malaria. The current level of financing is too low to end malaria. Bruno Moonen, deputy director for malaria at the Gates Foundation, says that more resources, more leadership, and new technologies are needed to eradicate malaria in the current generation. Is Bruno Moonen talking about production efficiency or allocative efficiency or both? Bruno Moonen is talking about _______. A. production efficiency but not allocative efficiency B. production efficiency and allocative efficiency C. allocative efficiency but not production efficiency D. neither production efficiency nor allocative efficiencyarrow_forwardWhat challenges do medical facilities face when trying to become more culturally competent? What kinds of assumptions do providers sometimes make about people from other cultures? What factors may cause providers to relate to patients in a biased manner? What can healthcare organizations do to ensure cultural competence among their employees?arrow_forwardBrazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, also known as BRICS, are emerging countries poised to be dominant economic players in the 21st century. What are some of the political, legal and economic conditions that help or hinder economic expansion for these countries?arrow_forward
- Explain what is Microeconomics? Why is it important for all of us to understand what are the drivers in microeconomics?arrow_forwardThe production function for a product is given by Q =100KL.if the price of capital is 120 dollars per day and the price of labor 30 dollars per day what is the minimum cost of producing 1000 units of output ?arrow_forwardخصائص TVAarrow_forward
- please show complete solution, step by step, thanksarrow_forwardTo determine the benefits of extending hours of operation for a food truck business, the couple should calculate additional revenue, break-even analysis, market demand, and raise prices. They should analyze competitors' prices and customer sensitivity to price changes, determine price elasticity, and test the strategy by implementing a slight price increase and monitoring sales closely. If costs exceed revenues, the couple should analyze their financials, evaluate their business model, explore new revenue streams, and consider long-term viability. They should analyze their financial statements to identify high costs and areas for reduction, evaluate their business model based on market demand, and explore new revenue streams like catering, special events, or partnerships with local businesses. Long-term viability is a key consideration, as if the business still operates at a loss after making adjustments, it may be necessary to consider shutting down. Staying in business should be…arrow_forwardRespond to following post. You can charge higher prices if the parents think these are valuable by providing different services such as extended hours, healthy lunches, and smaller staff-to-child ratios. But pushing for prices much higher won’t make sense unless parents think the added value is worth the price hike. You should research your local parents to find out what they want. If you want your business to be profitable, then focus on your strengths, do great work and have a reputation. Promote your special products and keep your prices low. If you want to see if you’re making money, keep a log of all your profits and losses. You’re making money if you’re earning more than you’re losing. A break-even analysis can help you figure out how many customers you need to eat and start making money. Keep an eye on your budget so you don’t get off track.arrow_forward
- If you are willing to pay up to $8 for your first cup of coffee the blank of your first cup of coffee is $8arrow_forwardnot use ai pleasearrow_forward(Figure: Good Y and Good X) Suppose the budget constraint shifted from constraint 2 to constraint 1. What could have caused this change? Quantity of good Y 18 16 14 Budget constraint 2 12- 10 8 Budget constraint 1 6 4 2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Quantity of good X an increase in income and an decrease in the price of good X relative to that of good Y a decrease in income an decrease in the price of good X and no change in the price of Y a decrease in income and an increase in the price of good X relative to that of good Y an increase in income a decrease in the price of good X relative to that of good Yarrow_forward
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStaxPrinciples of MicroeconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781305156050Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305971493Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781285165875Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning