Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Course List)
7th Edition
ISBN: 9781285165875
Author: N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 20, Problem 4QCMC
To determine
The 'original position' behind the veil of ignorance.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Is it just to tax the rich to give to the poor? Should the government tax Bill Gates and other wealthy people and use the money to supplement the income of unemployed people, single mothers with low incomes, or other poor people? Should the government tax rich people and loan the money interest free to poor kids so that they can go to college? Or would all of that be unjust? Make sure to mention ethical egoism, and altruism in your answer.
Which fact is Rawls's thought experiment of the "original position" behind the "veil of ignorance" meant to draw attention to? the station of life each of us was born into is largely a matter of luck outcomes are efficient only if everyone begins with equal opportunity most of the poor do not know how to find better jobs and escape poverty the rich have so much money that they don't know how to spend it all.
Income inequality is necessary for Pareto optimality so that people
will work as hard as they can.” “If income is distributed equally, then there must be
Pareto optimality because you can’t make one person better off without making
someone else worse off.” Are these statements true or false? Why or why not?
Chapter 20 Solutions
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Course List)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose that Eric believes that the government should aim to raise the welfare of the poorest people in society, because if we all started in the exact same position in life and then created rules and laws to obey as a society, people would be concerned about ending up at the bottom of the income distribution. Which redistributive philosophy is consistent with Eric's view? Utilitarianism Liberalism Libertarianism.arrow_forwardConsider a situation where you felt wronged by someone you had a relationship with: a parent, friend, boss, or employee. Explain the situation. Have you forgiven the wrongdoer for harming you? If no, how does your inability or unwillingness to forgive the wrongdoer continue to damage you? What positive benefits would you receive if you did forgive the wrongdoer? If you have forgiven them, how has this past situation impacted your relationship?arrow_forwardExamine your data from your “Country Organizer 2021” and your map that is now colored in. What patterns do you see? What if there are no patterns? What if your economic data and your social data do not correlate? That’s okay -- explain why you think they don’t correlate. Then examine if your economic data correlates to the wealth or poverty of a country and why? Or you could talk about how your social data correlates to the wealth or poverty of a country and why. You also need to discuss the exception. a) Write 1-2 paragraphs explaining the correlation. Make it a point to reference your data and country (countries) specifically. b) Write 1-2 paragraphs explaining the exceptions. Make it a point to reference your data and country (countries) specifically. Then use outside sources to confirm / support your assertion. No introduction paragraph is needed. Think about part a) and part b) as two separate sets of paragraphs. If we were physically in the building, i’d have you print…arrow_forward
- Evaluate whether each statement is true or false and provide a one- or two- sentence explanation for your answer. 7. The ACA’s employer mandate says that the only reason employers with more than 50 employees would receive a penalty is if they do not offer health insurance coverage to their employees. 8. The ACA required that all states expand Medicaid eligibility to all nonelderly individuals who earned below 138% of the federal poverty line. 9. The ACA resulted in a large decrease in the rate of people without insurance in the US; this decline primarily came from people gaining insurance through Medicaid expansionarrow_forwardWhich of the following statements is not correct? Select one: a. The economic life cycle theory explains why gifts of goods and services reduce poverty for the very young and the very old. b. Because people can borrow and save to smooth out changes in income, their standard of living in any one year depends more on lifetime income than on a particular year's income. c. The percentage of the population that suffers from long-term poverty is far smaller than the percentage of the population that suffers from short-term poverty because there is a high level of economic mobility in the United States. d. Permanent income is a better measure of a family's ability to buy the necessities of life than is transitory income.arrow_forwardA study on the perception of the urban poor on the housing program of the government. What is the value of the research? Explain. Who are the beneficiaries? Why do you think so? A survey on the presidential preference of the basic sectors (farmers, fisher folks, indigenous people, laborer, and urban poor) in the 2016 election. What is the value of the research? Explain. Who are the beneficiaries? Why do you think so?arrow_forward
- Polly, Molly, and Dolly are all single mothers. They each can earn $10 per hour working for up to 2,000 hours per year. Their government runs a welfare system that gives income benefits of $5,000 per year for single mothers with no income. The welfare benefits are reduced by $1 for every $2 in earned income. Currently, the government also provides free health care for children of single mothers with less than $25,000 in income. Each mother values this benefit at $2,000 per year. Under this system, Polly works 200 hours per year, Molly works 1,025 hours per year, and Dolly works 1,500 hours, so only Polly receives welfare. b. Draw a representative indifference curve for each mother. Discuss how the welfare program changes the behavior of these three individuals. d. The government decides to remove the welfare lock by providing free low- quality public health care (Ho-$2,000) for everyone. If the individuals want to consumer health care more than Ho, they have to turn to private health…arrow_forwardThere are three groups of citizens who visit a beach. Group C, which is the farthest away, has to pay $100 to visit the beach for a day. Group B has to pay $75, and group A, the closest, has to pay $25. Group C visits the beach 2 times per year, group B visits 7 times per year, and group A visits 12 times per year. Assume that there are 100 individuals in each group, and that all individuals across groups are identical, except for their distance to the beach. Use this information to extrapolate and plot the demand curve for beach days for an individual (as was done in class and in the book); you can assume that if the cost was $110 then no trips would be taken. Then, calculate the total consumer surplus generated by the beach.arrow_forwardStephanie has $200 left over this week, and she wants to contribute to a charitable cause. She can either feed 20 homeless persons two meals in a day or she can provide shelter for 10 homeless persons one night. What is the opportunity cost of Stephanie using all her money to shelter homeless people?arrow_forward
- Apart from society's laws, according to Hobbes, a person's rights are based on the laws of God. our natural desire to look after the interests of the others of our species. the objective moral order known by every rational mind. their "pedigree" or inheritance. the amount of power that one has.arrow_forwardWhat type of society did Karl Marx believe was fair to all workers? Marx believed the upper, middle, and lower classes should be defined by society. Marx believed factory owners should keep all profits rather than distributing them to the workers. Marx believed that a capitalist economy had the most benefits for workers. Marx believed a classless society was fair to all workers and could be achieved by developing a command economy.arrow_forwardConsider a world with two “types” of people, and where everyone lives for two periods. In period 1, they can either go to college or work. In period 2, everyone works. College costs $10,000 for “high” type people. For “low” type people, college is more difficult, so they have to spend $20,000 to earn a college degree (the extra cost comes from hiring a tutor). Everyone has a discount rate of 0. Employers wish to use college as a screening device. Specifically, they want to create a separating equilibrium where “high” types will choose to go to college but “low” types will not. The employers are willing to pay $30,000 to workers without a college degree. What range of salaries for college-educated workers would create the separating equilibrium?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of MicroeconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781305156050Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305971493Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:9781305156050
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305971493
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning