
The Local prices, exchange rate and PPP across the countries.
Concept Introduction:

Explanation of Solution
Apart from the International Comparisons Program (ICP) established in 1968, the annual test of PPP tracks the annual price of Mc Donald’s Corporation (MCD) Big Mac burger in many countries since 1986. In this PPP the price of the Big Mac is the benchmark and the hamburger replaces the basket.
The PPP would be the ratio of local prices in a country to the dollar price of the basket. This is also the expected rate of exchange. Is the actual rate of exchange is higher than this, the dollar is said to be overvalued and if the rate of exchange is lower dollar is said to be undervalued.
Part (a)
The graph below establishes a relationship between the local price, the expected rate of exchange or the PPP and the actual rate of exchange between the dollar and the local currency on the data sourced from the Big Mac PPP index.
Country | Local Price | Actual Dollar Exchange Rate | Expected Exchange Rate or the PPP |
Argentina | 75 | 18.9 | 14.2 |
Australia | 5.9 | 1.3 | 1.1 |
Brazil | 16.5 | 3.2 | 3.1 |
Britain | 3.19 | 0.7 | 0.6 |
Canada | 6.55 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Chile | 2600 | 605.9 | 492.4 |
China | 20.4 | 6.4 | 3.9 |
Colombia | 10900 | 2844.1 | 2064.4 |
Costa Rica | 2290 | 568.5 | 433.7 |
Czech Republic | 79 | 20.7 | 15.0 |
Denmark | 30 | 6.1 | 5.7 |
Egypt | 34.21 | 17.7 | 6.5 |
Euro area | 3.95 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
Hong Kong | 20.5 | 7.8 | 3.9 |
Hungary | 864 | 252.1 | 163.6 |
India | 180 | 63.9 | 34.1 |
Indonesia | 35750 | 13359.0 | 6770.8 |
Israel | 16.5 | 3.4 | 3.1 |
Japan | 380 | 110.7 | 72.0 |
Latvia | 2.7 | 0.8 | 0.5 |
Lithuania | 2.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 |
Malaysia | 9 | 4.0 | 1.7 |
Mexico | 48 | 18.7 | 9.1 |
New Zealand | 6.2 | 1.4 | 1.2 |
Norway | 49 | 7.9 | 9.3 |
Pakistan | 375 | 110.5 | 71.0 |
Peru | 10.5 | 3.2 | 2.0 |
Philippines | 134 | 50.7 | 25.4 |
Poland | 10.1 | 3.4 | 1.9 |
Russia | 130 | 56.7 | 24.6 |
Saudi Arabia | 12 | 3.8 | 2.3 |
Singapore | 5.8 | 1.3 | 1.1 |
South Africa | 30 | 12.3 | 5.7 |
South Korea | 4400 | 1069.3 | 833.3 |
Sri Lanka | 580 | 153.8 | 109.8 |
Sweden | 49.1 | 8.0 | 9.3 |
Switzerland | 6.5 | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Taiwan | 69 | 29.6 | 13.1 |
Thailand | 119 | 32.0 | 22.5 |
Turkey | 10.75 | 3.8 | 2.0 |
UAE | 14 | 3.7 | 2.7 |
Ukraine | 47 | 28.7 | 8.9 |
United States | 5.28 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Uruguay | 140 | 28.6 | 26.5 |
Vietnam | 65000 | 22711.5 | 12310.6 |
Austria | 3.4 | 0.8 | 0.6 |
Belgium | 4.1 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Estonia | 3.15 | 0.8 | 0.6 |
Finland | 4.56 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
France | 4.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Germany | 3.9 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
Greece | 3.35 | 0.8 | 0.6 |
Ireland | 4.07 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Italy | 4.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Netherlands | 3.71 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
Portugal | 3.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 |
Spain | 3.95 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
Country Local Price Actual Dollar Exchange Rate Expected Exchange Rate or the PPP Argentina 75 18.9 14.2 Australia 5.9 1.3 1.1 Brazil 16.5 3.2 3.1 Britain 3.19 0.7 0.6 Canada 6.55 1.2 1.2 Chile 2600 605.9 492.4 China 20.4 6.4 3.9 Colombia 10900 2844.1 2064.4 Costa Rica 2290 568.5 433.7 Czech Republic 79 20.7 15.0 Denmark 30 6.1 5.7 Egypt 34.21 17.7 6.5 Euro area 3.95 0.8 0.7 Hong Kong 20.5 7.8 3.9 Hungary 864 252.1 163.6 India 180 63.9 34.1 Indonesia 35750 13359.0 6770.8 Israel 16.5 3.4 3.1 Japan 380 110.7 72.0 Latvia 2.7 0.8 0.5 Lithuania 2.8 0.8 0.5 Malaysia 9 4.0 1.7 Mexico 48 18.7 9.1 New Zealand 6.2 1.4 1.2 Norway 49 7.9 9.3 Pakistan 375 110.5 71.0 Peru 10.5 3.2 2.0 Philippines 134 50.7 25.4 Poland 10.1 3.4 1.9 Russia 130 56.7 24.6 Saudi Arabia 12 3.8 2.3 Singapore 5.8 1.3 1.1 South Africa 30 12.3 5.7 South Korea 4400 1069.3 833.3 Sri Lanka 580 153.8 109.8 Sweden 49.1 8.0 9.3 Switzerland 6.5 1.0 1.2 Taiwan 69 29.6 13.1 Thailand 119 32.0 22.5 Turkey 10.75 3.8 2.0 UAE 14 3.7 2.7 Ukraine 47 28.7 8.9 United States 5.28 1.0 1.0 Uruguay 140 28.6 26.5 Vietnam 65000 22711.5 12310.6 Austria 3.4 0.8 0.6 Belgium 4.1 0.8 0.8 Estonia 3.15 0.8 0.6 Finland 4.56 0.8 0.9 France 4.2 0.8 0.8 Germany 3.9 0.8 0.7 Greece 3.35 0.8 0.6 Ireland 4.07 0.8 0.8 Italy 4.2 0.8 0.8 Netherlands 3.71 0.8 0.7 Portugal 3.2 0.8 0.6 Spain 3.95 0.8 0.7 |
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 20 Solutions
EBK THE ECONOMICS OF MONEY, BANKING AND
- Experiments Research suggests that if students use laptops in class, it can have some effect on student achievement. While laptop usage can help students take lecture notes faster, some argue that the laptops may be a source of distraction for the students. Suppose you are interested in looking at the effect of using laptops in class on the students' final exam scores out of 100. You decide to conduct a randomized control trial where you randomly assign some students at UIC to use a laptop in class and other to not use a laptop in class. (Assume that the classes are in person and not online) a. Which people are a part of the treatment group and which people are a part of the control group? (10 points) b. What regression will you run? Define the variables where required. (10 points)arrow_forwardExperiments Research suggests that if students use laptops in class, it can have some effect on student achievement. While laptop usage can help students take lecture notes faster, some argue that the laptops may be a source of distraction for the students. Suppose you are interested in looking at the effect of using laptops in class on the students' final exam scores out of 100. You decide to conduct a randomized control trial where you randomly assign some students at UIC to use a laptop in class and other to not use a laptop in class. (Assume that the classes are in person and not online) a. Which people are a part of the treatment group and which people are a part of the control group? (10 points) b. What regression will you run? Define the variables where required. (10 points)arrow_forwardDummy variables News reports claim that in the last year television watching has increased. You believe that rising unemployment during Covid may be one of the causes for this. Suppose you are interested in looking at the effect of being unemployed on the hours spent watching Netflix per day. You collect data on 10,000 people from Chicago who are between the age of 20 and 60. You define the dummy variable Unemployed which takes the value 1 for those who are unemployed and 0 for those who are employed. Equation 1: Hours spent watching Netflix₁ = ßo + B₁Unemployed; + ε¿ Following is the output for equation 1: reg hours spent_watching_netflix unemployed Source SS df MS Number of obs 10,000 F(1, 9998) = 14314.03 Model Residual 3539.70065 2472.39364 9,998 1 3539.70065 .247288822 Prob F R-squared == 0.0000 = 0.5888 Total 6012.09429 9,999 . 601269556 Adj R-squared Root MSE = 0.5887 .49728 hours spen~x Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] unemployed cons 1.189908 .0099456 119.64…arrow_forward
- Dummy variables News reports claim that in the last year television watching has increased. You believe that rising unemployment during Covid may be one of the causes for this. Suppose you are interested in looking at the effect of being unemployed on the hours spent watching Netflix per day. You collect data on 10,000 people from Chicago who are between the age of 20 and 60. You define the dummy variable Unemployed which takes the value 1 for those who are unemployed and 0 for those who are employed. Equation 1: Hours spent watching Netflix₁ = ßo + B₁Unemployed; + ε¿ Following is the output for equation 1: reg hours spent_watching_netflix unemployed Source SS df MS Number of obs 10,000 F(1, 9998) = 14314.03 Model Residual 3539.70065 2472.39364 9,998 1 3539.70065 .247288822 Prob F R-squared == 0.0000 = 0.5888 Total 6012.09429 9,999 . 601269556 Adj R-squared Root MSE = 0.5887 .49728 hours spen~x Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] unemployed cons 1.189908 .0099456 119.64…arrow_forward17. The South African government's distributive stance is clear given its prioritisation of social spending, which includes grants and subsidised goods. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of an in-kind subsidy versus a cash grant. Use a graphical illustration to support your arguments. [15] 18. Redistributive expenditure can take the form of direct cash transfers (grants) and/or in-kind subsidies. With references to the graphs below, discuss the merits of these two transfer types in the presence and absence of a positive externality. [14] 19. Expenditure on education and healthcare have, by far, the biggest redistributive effect in South Africa' by one estimate dropping the Gini-coefficient by 10 percentage points. Discuss the South African government's performance in health and education provision by evaluating both the outputs and outcomes in these areas of service delivery. [15] 20. Define the following concepts and provide an example in each case: tax rate structure, general…arrow_forwardSummarise the case for government intervention in the education marketarrow_forward
- Should Maureen question the family about the history of the home? Can Maureen access public records for proof of repairs?arrow_forward3. Distinguish between a direct democracy and a representative democracy. Use appropriate examples to support your answers. [4] 4. Explain the distinction between outputs and outcomes in social service delivery [2] 5. A R1000 tax payable by all adults could be viewed as both a proportional tax and a regressive tax. Do you agree? Explain. [4] 6. Briefly explain the displacement effect in Peacock and Wiseman's model of government expenditure growth and provide a relevant example of it in the South African context. [5] 7. Explain how unbalanced productivity growth may affect government expenditure and briefly comment on its relevance to South Africa. [5] 8. South Africa has recently proposed an increase in its value-added tax rate to 15%, sparking much controversy. Why is it argued that value-added tax is inequitable and what can be done to correct the inequity? [5] 9. Briefly explain the difference between access to education and the quality of education, and why we should care about the…arrow_forward20. Factors 01 pro B. the technological innovations available to companies. A. the laws that regulate manufacturers. C. the resources used to create output D. the waste left over after goods are produced. 21. Table 1.1 shows the tradeoff between different combinations of missile production and home construction, ceteris paribus. Complete the table by calculating the required opportunity costs for both missiles and houses. Then answer the indicated question(s). Combination Number of houses Opportunity cost of houses in Number of missiles terms of missiles J 0 4 K 10,000 3 L 17,000 2 1 M 21,000 0 N 23,000 Opportunity cost of missiles in terms of houses Tutorials-Principles of Economics m health carearrow_forward
- In a small open economy with a floating exchange rate, the supply of real money balances is fixed and a rise in government spending ______ Group of answer choices Raises the interest rate so that net exports must fall to maintain equilibrium in the goods market. Cannot change the interest rate so that net exports must fall to maintain equilibrium in the goods market. Cannot change the interest rate so income must rise to maintain equilibrium in the money market Raises the interest rate, so that income must rise to maintain equilibrium in the money market.arrow_forwardSuppose a country with a fixed exchange rate decides to implement a devaluation of its currency and commits to maintaining the new fixed parity. This implies (A) ______________ in the demand for its goods and a monetary (B) _______________. Group of answer choices (A) expansion ; (B) contraction (A) contraction ; (B) expansion (A) expansion ; (B) expansion (A) contraction ; (B) contractionarrow_forwardAssume a small open country under fixed exchanges rate and full capital mobility. Prices are fixed in the short run and equilibrium is given initially at point A. An exogenous increase in public spending shifts the IS curve to IS'. Which of the following statements is true? Group of answer choices A new equilibrium is reached at point B. The TR curve will shift down until it passes through point B. A new equilibrium is reached at point C. Point B can only be reached in the absence of capital mobility.arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





