EBK THE ECONOMICS OF MONEY, BANKING AND
EBK THE ECONOMICS OF MONEY, BANKING AND
5th Edition
ISBN: 9780134734545
Author: Mishkin
Publisher: YUZU
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 20, Problem 2WE
To determine

The Local prices, exchange rate and PPP across the countries.

Concept Introduction:

Purchasing Power Parity(PPP)- The theory is based on the metric of purchasing power to assess the currency rate equilibrium on the foreign exchange market. Two currencies are compared using the basket of goods approach. Two currencies are said to be in equilibrium if the local prices of the basket of goods are the same in both the countries.

Expert Solution & Answer
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Apart from the International Comparisons Program (ICP) established in 1968, the annual test of PPP tracks the annual price of Mc Donald’s Corporation (MCD) Big Mac burger in many countries since 1986. In this PPP the price of the Big Mac is the benchmark and the hamburger replaces the basket.

The PPP would be the ratio of local prices in a country to the dollar price of the basket. This is also the expected rate of exchange. Is the actual rate of exchange is higher than this, the dollar is said to be overvalued and if the rate of exchange is lower dollar is said to be undervalued.

Part (a)

The graph below establishes a relationship between the local price, the expected rate of exchange or the PPP and the actual rate of exchange between the dollar and the local currency on the data sourced from the Big Mac PPP index.

    Country
    Local Price
    Actual Dollar Exchange Rate
    Expected Exchange Rate or the PPP
    Argentina
    75
    18.9
    14.2
    Australia
    5.9
    1.3
    1.1
    Brazil
    16.5
    3.2
    3.1
    Britain
    3.19
    0.7
    0.6
    Canada
    6.55
    1.2
    1.2
    Chile
    2600
    605.9
    492.4
    China
    20.4
    6.4
    3.9
    Colombia
    10900
    2844.1
    2064.4
    Costa Rica
    2290
    568.5
    433.7
    Czech Republic
    79
    20.7
    15.0
    Denmark
    30
    6.1
    5.7
    Egypt
    34.21
    17.7
    6.5
    Euro area
    3.95
    0.8
    0.7
    Hong Kong
    20.5
    7.8
    3.9
    Hungary
    864
    252.1
    163.6
    India
    180
    63.9
    34.1
    Indonesia
    35750
    13359.0
    6770.8
    Israel
    16.5
    3.4
    3.1
    Japan
    380
    110.7
    72.0
    Latvia
    2.7
    0.8
    0.5
    Lithuania
    2.8
    0.8
    0.5
    Malaysia
    9
    4.0
    1.7
    Mexico
    48
    18.7
    9.1
    New Zealand
    6.2
    1.4
    1.2
    Norway
    49
    7.9
    9.3
    Pakistan
    375
    110.5
    71.0
    Peru
    10.5
    3.2
    2.0
    Philippines
    134
    50.7
    25.4
    Poland
    10.1
    3.4
    1.9
    Russia
    130
    56.7
    24.6
    Saudi Arabia
    12
    3.8
    2.3
    Singapore
    5.8
    1.3
    1.1
    South Africa
    30
    12.3
    5.7
    South Korea
    4400
    1069.3
    833.3
    Sri Lanka
    580
    153.8
    109.8
    Sweden
    49.1
    8.0
    9.3
    Switzerland
    6.5
    1.0
    1.2
    Taiwan
    69
    29.6
    13.1
    Thailand
    119
    32.0
    22.5
    Turkey
    10.75
    3.8
    2.0
    UAE
    14
    3.7
    2.7
    Ukraine
    47
    28.7
    8.9
    United States
    5.28
    1.0
    1.0
    Uruguay
    140
    28.6
    26.5
    Vietnam
    65000
    22711.5
    12310.6
    Austria
    3.4
    0.8
    0.6
    Belgium
    4.1
    0.8
    0.8
    Estonia
    3.15
    0.8
    0.6
    Finland
    4.56
    0.8
    0.9
    France
    4.2
    0.8
    0.8
    Germany
    3.9
    0.8
    0.7
    Greece
    3.35
    0.8
    0.6
    Ireland
    4.07
    0.8
    0.8
    Italy
    4.2
    0.8
    0.8
    Netherlands
    3.71
    0.8
    0.7
    Portugal
    3.2
    0.8
    0.6
    Spain
    3.95
    0.8
    0.7
    Country
    Local Price
    Actual Dollar Exchange Rate
    Expected Exchange Rate or the PPP

    Argentina
    75
    18.9
    14.2

    Australia
    5.9
    1.3
    1.1

    Brazil
    16.5
    3.2
    3.1

    Britain
    3.19
    0.7
    0.6

    Canada
    6.55
    1.2
    1.2

    Chile
    2600
    605.9
    492.4

    China
    20.4
    6.4
    3.9

    Colombia
    10900
    2844.1
    2064.4

    Costa Rica
    2290
    568.5
    433.7

    Czech Republic
    79
    20.7
    15.0

    Denmark
    30
    6.1
    5.7

    Egypt
    34.21
    17.7
    6.5

    Euro area
    3.95
    0.8
    0.7

    Hong Kong
    20.5
    7.8
    3.9

    Hungary
    864
    252.1
    163.6

    India
    180
    63.9
    34.1

    Indonesia
    35750
    13359.0
    6770.8

    Israel
    16.5
    3.4
    3.1

    Japan
    380
    110.7
    72.0

    Latvia
    2.7
    0.8
    0.5

    Lithuania
    2.8
    0.8
    0.5

    Malaysia
    9
    4.0
    1.7

    Mexico
    48
    18.7
    9.1

    New Zealand
    6.2
    1.4
    1.2

    Norway
    49
    7.9
    9.3

    Pakistan
    375
    110.5
    71.0

    Peru
    10.5
    3.2
    2.0

    Philippines
    134
    50.7
    25.4

    Poland
    10.1
    3.4
    1.9

    Russia
    130
    56.7
    24.6

    Saudi Arabia
    12
    3.8
    2.3

    Singapore
    5.8
    1.3
    1.1

    South Africa
    30
    12.3
    5.7

    South Korea
    4400
    1069.3
    833.3

    Sri Lanka
    580
    153.8
    109.8

    Sweden
    49.1
    8.0
    9.3

    Switzerland
    6.5
    1.0
    1.2

    Taiwan
    69
    29.6
    13.1

    Thailand
    119
    32.0
    22.5

    Turkey
    10.75
    3.8
    2.0

    UAE
    14
    3.7
    2.7

    Ukraine
    47
    28.7
    8.9

    United States
    5.28
    1.0
    1.0

    Uruguay
    140
    28.6
    26.5

    Vietnam
    65000
    22711.5
    12310.6

    Austria
    3.4
    0.8
    0.6

    Belgium
    4.1
    0.8
    0.8

    Estonia
    3.15
    0.8
    0.6

    Finland
    4.56
    0.8
    0.9

    France
    4.2
    0.8
    0.8

    Germany
    3.9
    0.8
    0.7

    Greece
    3.35
    0.8
    0.6

    Ireland
    4.07
    0.8
    0.8

    Italy
    4.2
    0.8
    0.8

    Netherlands
    3.71
    0.8
    0.7

    Portugal
    3.2
    0.8
    0.6

    Spain
    3.95
    0.8
    0.7

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
Difference-in-Difference In the beginning of 2001, North Dakota legalized fireworks. Suppose you are interested in studying the effect of the legalizing of fireworks on the number of house fires in North Dakota. Unlike North Dakota, South Dakota did not legalize fireworks and continued to ban them. You decide to use a Difference-in-difference (DID) Model. The numbers of house fires in each state at the end of 2000 and 2001 are as follows: Number of house fires in Number of house fires in Year North Dakota 2000 2001 35 50 South Dakota 54 64 a. What is the change in the outcome for the treatment group between 2000 and 2001? Show your working for full credit. (10 points) b. Can we interpret the change in the outcome for the treatment group between 2000 and 2001 as the causal effect of legalizing fireworks on number of house fires? Explain your answer. (10 points)
C. Regression Discontinuity Birth weight is used as a common sign for a newborn's health. In the United States, if a baby has a birthweight below 1500 grams, the newborn is classified as having “very low birth weight". Suppose you want to study the effect of having very low birth weight on the number of hospital visits made before the baby's first birthday. You decide to use Regression Discontinuity to answer this question. The graph below shows the RD model: Number of hospital visits made before baby's first birthday 5 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 Birthweight (in grams) a. What is the running variable? (5 points) b. What is the cutoff? (5 points) T What is the discontinuity in the graph and how do you interpret it? (10 points)
C. Regression Discontinuity Birth weight is used as a common sign for a newborn's health. In the United States, if a baby has a birthweight below 1500 grams, the newborn is classified as having “very low birth weight". Suppose you want to study the effect of having very low birth weight on the number of hospital visits made before the baby's first birthday. You decide to use Regression Discontinuity to answer this question. The graph below shows the RD model: Number of hospital visits made before baby's first birthday 5 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 Birthweight (in grams) a. What is the running variable? (5 points) b. What is the cutoff? (5 points) T What is the discontinuity in the graph and how do you interpret it? (10 points)
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:Oxford University Press
Text book image
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education