The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337535878
Author: Frank B. Cross; Roger LeRoy Miller
Publisher: Cengage Learning US
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 20, Problem 2IS
Summary Introduction
Case summary: Employee E works in company F. While working on a task E he got himself injured.
To explain : In order to obtain workers compensation whether it is necessary that E’s injury has to be caused by the negligence of F.
Summary Introduction
Case summary:Employee E works in company F. While working on a task E he got himself injured.
To find: Whether intentional injury is still counted as eligibility for workers’ compensation.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Susan owns and operate a food processing factory in New Territories Hong Kong. Susan bought worker’s compensation and employer’s liability policy to protect herself for workers job related-injury or occupational disease. Explain whether the following situation are covered under this policy.
A customer entered Susan’s factory and was hurt by a box in the factory.
An employee died accidentally because of the machine failure in Susan’s factory.
With reference to case law, define the tort of negligence and discuss what a claimantmust show in order to bring a successful claim for negligence.
To win a suit for negligence, injured person must show all but one:
Select one:
O a. The company s behavior was the proxmate cause of the plaintiff s injuries.
O b. The company creates an unreasonable risk of harm.
O c. The company acted with total care and respect to the harm that could result
O d. The company broke its duty of care,
Chapter 20 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Under what circumstances should a principal (employer) be responsible for the torts committed by an agent (employee)? If an agent injures a third party during the course of employment, to what extent should the employer be held liable? Under what circumstances should the agent be held personally liable? Provide an example to illustrate your opinion. What ethical considerations underlie the doctrine of respondeat superior?arrow_forwardAnswer pleasearrow_forwardIn what circumstances does the law impose liability on a person who is not at fault? How can liability without fault be justified? explain in essay typearrow_forward
- Identify the legal concept of negligence and discuss the elements necessary to establish a negligence cause of action as discussed in the text. Be sure to pay particular attention to the issues of causation, foreseeability, proximate cause, and the defenses one may have to a negligence lawsuit as evidenced in Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99 (1928).arrow_forwardT or F In the context of grievance procedures, the principle of just cause originally places the burden of proof on an employer.arrow_forwardUnder the Law of Tort, with regards to the general principles of negligence what is the concept of duty, the standard of care, causuation, damages and contributory negligencearrow_forward
- Please list and describe the 3 types of torts.arrow_forwardHello, I am in need of assistance to answer the following question in tort law (according to English Law): Graham was employed as a waiter. He prided himself on his physical appearance and his ability to carry trays and dishes with dexterity and professionalism. He developed a tremor in his arm, which affected his ability to carry out these tasks, and consulted Dr Holly about the problem. Dr Holly recommended a surgical intervention in an area of the brain from where she felt that the tremor was emanating. She warned Graham about the 1% risk of stroke associated with the operation. However, she did not inform Graham of the facts that (1) there was a new pharmaceutical drug available on the market which might alleviate the tremor and which had a 0% risk of stroke, or that (2) the surgical procedure also had a 1% risk of affecting nerves around that area of the brain stem which could affect bodily functions such as continence. Graham underwent the operation. He was left incontinent, and…arrow_forward5-3 PROXIMATE CAUSE. Galen Stoller was killed at a railroad crossing when a train hit his car. The crossing was marked with a stop sign and a railroad-crossing symbol. The sign was not obstructed by vegetation, but there were no flashing lights. Galen’s parents filed a suit against Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad Corp. The plaintiffs accused the defendant of negligence in the design and maintenance of the crossing. The defendant argued that Galen had not stopped at the stop sign. Was the railroad negligent? What was the proximate cause of the accident? Discuss. [Henderson v. National Railroad Passenger Corp., __ F.3d __ (10th Cir. 2011)] (See Negligence.)arrow_forward
- What legal duty, if any, does the physician owe the person? Please explain in detail. Assuming that the physician has a legal duty towards the person, did the physician breach that legal duty? Please explain in detail. Assume that the physician knew that they were infected with a communicable disease and purposefully performed the CPR, although others at the scene could have performed it; what intentional tort(s), if any, has the physician committed against the person? List the tort(s.) What possible defense(s) does the physician have against a tort action by the person.arrow_forwardRebekah unknowingly grows illegal marijuana plants in her garden, assuming they are just weeds. If Rebekah is discovered growing the marijuana, strict liability would infer that: A. Rebekah is not liable if someone else was witnessed planting the marijuana B. Rebekah is not liable because she had no illegal intent C. Rebekah is liable only if she was found to be negligent in not recognizing the marijuana D. Rebekah is liable even though she had no illegal intentarrow_forwardWhich of the following does not describe the concept of proximate cause in the tort of negligence? (Choose all of the correct answers.) Could the plaintiff reasonably foresee the defendant would engage in this particular harmful conduct? Could the defendant reasonably foresee his conduct could lead to the injury suffered by the plaintiff? Could the defendant reasonably foresee he had a duty of the plaintiff? Could the plaintiff reasonably foresee the injury he suffered? Was the defendant the actual cause of plaintiff's injury?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education