The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337535878
Author: Frank B. Cross; Roger LeRoy Miller
Publisher: Cengage Learning US
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 20, Problem 2CT
Summary Introduction
Case summary: Person S was an employee in company T. He was not paid for doing overtime and his work hours were underreported by his supervisor. As a result, S quit the job and filed a lawsuit against the employer under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). In defense, T argued that S never objected to the supervisor’s act. He also violated the correct time keeping record of the company.
To explain:The reasoning of the court in the given case.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
How does the U.S. court system affects the conduct of businesses and individuals.
Briefly, what are the alternatives to suing someone in court to enforce your legal rights, and why would you consider them?
What are the three main methods in which the doctrine of precedent operates within a legal system?
Discuss why the legal system in the United States ensures that federal law preempts state law. What are the advantages of having one set of laws, such as federal law, above all others? Does this infringe upon the states' rights to govern their citizens? Even if the federal constitution should preempt all other laws, should federal statutes preempt state constitutions? Why/why not?
Chapter 20 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- What is administrative law, and what is its role in the legal system? Explain the relationship between administrative agencies, the executive branch, and the judiciary.arrow_forwardNo Plagiarism Please! Compare the major antitrust acts of the United States. Specify the intent and purpose of each, and draw conclusions about their effectiveness.arrow_forwardShould U.S. courts, and in particular the United States Supreme Court look to the laws of other nations for guidance when deciding important issues, including those involving rights granted by the Constitution? If so, what impact might this have on their decisions? Please explain.arrow_forward
- One of the overriding interest in the study of healthcare law and ethics is to discover where pure legal analysis ends, and subjective judgments of constitutional principles and public policy begin. In the course of one semester, not only have we learned the substantive content and intent of healthcare law and regulation, but how ethical and normative dilemmas arise therefrom. We have seen how courts can be just and efficient in fact-finding, particularly in healthcare cases involving criminal law and torts (e.g., through our IIED workshop and jury verdict). But we have also seen how their decisions can be controversial, provoke public outrage, and raise even more unsettling ethical dilemmas in constitutional interpretation of the most basic of principles and guarantees, such as "life, liberty, and private property free speech", "due process of law", "equal protection of the laws, etc. From abortion to sterilization, from disability to surrogacy, from end-of-life to physician-assisted…arrow_forwardAn example of a legal object may be : a) an idea you have for a new business venture B) a 21-year old male person C) all natural and juristic persons D) all the abovearrow_forwardwhats the difference between statutory law and case lawarrow_forward
- Please defend your position on the following statement: “The Statute of Frauds is old law that has outlived its usefulness and should be abandoned by today’s courts.” Be sure to state your position and support it with at least THREE points. pls note this is business law question!arrow_forwardIt's suspected that the adulterated Magentum some businesses dumped into the sewer is what is responsible for the pollution in our country's lakes and rivers. Some government officials think there should be a new crime recognized related to dumping industrial waste into sewers. What's a legal obstacle that makes it difficult to charge businesses with crimes? It's impossible to prove the requisite actus reus. Crimes require mens rea and it's hard to argue that a business had the culpability of a guilty mind. You can never charge a business with a strict liability crime. There are no legal obstaclesarrow_forwardDo you think courts have struck the right balance between first amendment rights and the antitrust goal of economic efficiency (e.g., preventing undue influence from special interest groups) through the Noerr-Pennington doctrine? If you believe the doctrine is too permissive, what alternatives would you propose?arrow_forward
- What are the sources of administrative law? Discuss the rulemaking process, including notice and comment procedures, and the authority of agencies to issue regulations and interpretive rules.arrow_forwardExplain the Critical Legal Studies theory of business law, and discuss its implications for legal decision-making.arrow_forwardWhen decisions on legal issues are made by judges, they write their decisions, or setting out reasons.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning