Country which has unequal distribution of income-Australia or the United States.
Explanation of Solution
Here, as given the below table shows that the distribution of market income in Australia.
Table: 1
Households | Market income (%) |
Lowest 20% | 1 |
Second 20% | 3 |
Third 20% | 15 |
Fourth 20% | 26 |
Highest 20% | 55 |
Here, two sectors of the economy are Household and Business. Household sector owns all factors of production like land, labor and capital. These factors are required for production, which is carried out by business sector. Business sector has to pay price for getting these factors. Landowner will get rent, labor will receive wages and interest is paid to the owner of capital. Sum of the earnings from factors is known as household's market income.
Thus, household's income is the amount that he receives in a given period from factors.
In a country, the distribution of income is the important point. It indicates what percentage of income is flowing to a specific percentage of the total household. Total population is divided into few equal sized groups in ascending order from low income to high income. If total household is divided into five equal groups, then it is known as quintiles.
Then, in quintiles, each group consists of 20 percent of the total households. Considering market income percent of each group, income distribution table of an economy is formed.
Considering the market distribution of income in Australia as given in table 1 in the problem following cumulative distribution of income can be shown-
Cumulative Market Income distribution table of Australia:
Groups | Percentage of | Cumulative percentage of | ||
Households | Income | Households | Income | |
A | Lowest 20% | 1 | 20% | 1 |
B | Second 20% | 3 | 40% | 4 |
C | Third 20% | 15 | 60% | 19 |
D | Fourth 20% | 26 | 80% | 45 |
E | Highest 20% | 55 | 100% | 100 |
In the above table: 2, entire households have been divided into five equal groups A to E. Each group consists of 20 percent of total households. There market income figures are taken from table 1.
Cumulative is the summation of all figures of the group and earlier groups. For group A, cumulative percentages and table: 2 figures are same since no other groups are available before group A. Cumulative figures of group B is the summation of percentage of group B and its earlier group A. Then, cumulative percentage of households is
In this manner, cumulative percentage of group C households is
Lorenz curve is a diagram, which reflects unequal distribution pattern of market income in an economy. The diagram is drawn below:
In the diagram, X-axis shows cumulative percentage of households and Y-axis measures the percentage of market income. Red curve is the actual percentage of income flowing to different subsections of people. Straight line is the curve when distribution is equal. Suppose 20% of total population receives exactly 20% of total income, then the distribution is equal. It will lie on a point of the linear curve. Hence, deviation of actual distribution line from equal distribution line will indicate level of unequal distribution. More the actual line deviates from linear line, more will be the level of unequal distribution.
Inequality of the distribution pattern of income in Australia and United states can be compared by drawing Lorenz curve of the two countries. In order to draw Lorenz curve of United States following data of the table are considered. The data below is the market income distribution of United States.
Cumulative Market income distribution table of United States:
Groups | Percentage of | Cumulative percentage of | ||
Households | Income | Households | Income | |
A1 | Lowest 20% | 0.9 | 20% | 0.9 |
B1 | Second 20% | 7.1 | 40% | 8.0 |
C1 | Third 20% | 14.3 | 60% | 22.3 |
D1 | Fourth 20% | 24.4 | 80% | 46.7 |
E1 | Highest 20% | 53.3 | 100% | 100 |
Above data has been used to draw Lorenz curve of United States in the diagram above by a blue curve.
In the diagram, blue curve is closer to the straight line than red curve. Then, inequality in income distribution in United States is less than the inequality in income distribution at Australia.
Concept Introduction:
When there is huge difference between wealth of people living in a country, thereby leading to difference in living standard, is considered as inequality.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 20 Solutions
EBK FOUNDATIONS OF ECONOMICS
- Don't used hand raitingarrow_forwardAnswer in step by step with explanation. Don't use Ai.arrow_forwardUse the figure below to answer the following question. Let I represent Income when healthy, let I represent income when ill. Let E [I] represent expected income for a given probability (p) of falling ill. Utility у в ULI income Is есте IM The actuarially fair & partial contract is represented by Point X × OB A Yarrow_forward
- Suppose that there is a 25% chance Riju is injured and earns $180,000, and a 75% chance she stays healthy and will earn $900,000. Suppose further that her utility function is the following: U = (Income) ³. Riju's utility if she earns $180,000 is _ and her utility if she earns $900,000 is. X 56.46; 169.38 56.46; 96.55 96.55; 56.46 40.00; 200.00 169.38; 56.46arrow_forwardUse the figure below to answer the following question. Let là represent Income when healthy, let Is represent income when ill. Let E[I], represent expected income for a given probability (p) of falling ill. Utility & B естве IH S Point D represents ☑ actuarially fair & full contract actuarially fair & partial contract O actuarially unfair & full contract uninsurance incomearrow_forwardSuppose that there is a 25% chance Riju is injured and earns $180,000, and a 75% chance she stays healthy and will earn $900,000. Suppose further that her utility function is the following: U = (Income). Riju is risk. She will prefer (given the same expected income). averse; no insurance to actuarially fair and full insurance lover; actuarially fair and full insurance to no insurance averse; actuarially fair and full insurance to no insurance neutral; he will be indifferent between actuarially fair and full insurance to no insurance lover; no insurance to actuarially fair and full insurancearrow_forward
- 19. (20 points in total) Suppose that the market demand curve is p = 80 - 8Qd, where p is the price per unit and Qd is the number of units demanded per week, and the market supply curve is p = 5+7Qs, where Q5 is the quantity supplied per week. a. b. C. d. e. Calculate the equilibrium price and quantity for a competitive market in which there is no market failure. Draw a diagram that includes the demand and supply curves, the values of the vertical- axis intercepts, and the competitive equilibrium quantity and price. Label the curves, axes and areas. Calculate both the marginal willingness to pay and the total willingness to pay for the equilibrium quantity. Calculate both the marginal cost of the equilibrium quantity and variable cost of producing the equilibrium quantity. Calculate the total surplus. How is the value of total surplus related to your calculations in parts c and d?arrow_forwardPlease answer all parts of the questionarrow_forwardDon't use ai to answer I will report you answerarrow_forward
- What is a multi domain strategy in SEO? How does it work?arrow_forwardSam's profit is maximized when he produces shirts. When he does this, the marginal cost of the last shirt he produces is , which is than the price Sam receives for each shirt he sells. The marginal cost of producing an additional shirt (that is, one more shirt than would maximize his profit) is , which is than the price Sam receives for each shirt he sells. Therefore, Sam's profit-maximizing quantity corresponds to the intersection of the curves. Because Sam is a price taker, this last condition can also be written as .arrow_forwardWhy must total spending be equal to total income in an economy? Total income plus total spending equals total output. The value-added measurement of GDP shows this is true. Every dollar that someone spends is a dollar of income for someone else. all of the abovearrow_forward
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage LearningMicroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305971493Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning