Case S ummary : A person, BM, played football for the company, TT. He entered into a contract with the company, TT. A provision of the contract laid down that in the wake of a dispute, the same would be submitted for arbitration. Both the parties agreed that the arbitration would be governed by Tennessee law. To F ind : The authority of the court to set aside or affirm arbitrator’s award.

Question

Marleen was employed by Acme, Inc. When she accepted the job, as part of her compensation package, she agreed that any dispute between her and Acme would be resolved through non-binding arbitration. When Marleen was passed over for promotion three times, she alleged that Acme violated her civil rights and initiated arbitration proceedings. If either party disagrees with the decision of the arbitrator, will a court hear the case? a. Yes, because here arbitration is non-binding. b. No, because the purpose of arbitration is to reduce the number of cases heard by a judge. c. Yes, because arbitration is disfavored in that it deprives plaintiffs of their day in court. d. No, because the agreement to arbitrate was contractual and included an agreement to abide by the arbitrator’s decision.

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 2, Problem 4BCP

Summary Introduction

Case Summary: A person, BM, played football for the company, TT. He entered into a contract with the company, TT. A provision of the contract laid down that in the wake of a dispute, the same would be submitted for arbitration. Both the parties agreed that the arbitration would be governed by Tennessee law.

To Find: The authority of the court to set aside or affirm arbitrator’s award.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Marleen was employed by Acme, Inc. When she accepted the job, as part of her compensation package, she agreed that any dispute between her and Acme would be resolved through non-binding arbitration. When Marleen was passed over for promotion three times, she alleged that Acme violated her civil rights and initiated arbitration proceedings. If either party disagrees with the decision of the arbitrator, will a court hear the case? a. Yes, because here arbitration is non-binding. b. No, because the purpose of arbitration is to reduce the number of cases heard by a judge. c. Yes, because arbitration is disfavored in that it deprives plaintiffs of their day in court. d. No, because the agreement to arbitrate was contractual and included an agreement to abide by the arbitrator’s decision.

Tim and Kristen work together in College Station, Texas. Tim mentions that he is selling his car and Kristen offers to buy it. When Kristen gets the car, the air conditioning doesn't work. Kristen says, "The deal is off." Tim responds, "No, we had a contract." If the parties do not want to go to court, but they would like a third-party to be involved, what form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) could they use? O Arbitration Mediation O Negotiation Either Arbitration or Mediation ◄ Previous Next ▸

In the Silvestri v. Optus Software, Inc. case, the employment contract contained a 2-year employment agreement with a satisfaction clause. Which of the following was held? A. The satisfaction clause was not enforced, because it was a restraint on trade. B. The satisfaction clause was not enforced, because it was subjective. C. The employer breached the contract and had to pay damages. D. The termination of employment before the 2- year period was enforced.