The person, AW, was employed as a collector for FCS. While attending a collection call, she informed a debtor that $15 processing fee was an “interest” charge. The information provided by her violated the company policy and AW was sacked. She claimed for unemployment benefits. The same was approved by MD Employment service. FCS objected to this approval and testified that AW made a false statement though she admitted the contrary. The agency found that AW’s termination of services could not be attributed to misconduct, which could deprive her of the benefits. MD Employment services approval was upheld by the reviewing court. Hence, FCS appealed. To explain : The likelihood to uphold the findings of MD Employment services.

Question

Honda Canada Inc. v. Keays, [2008] Mr. Keays was hired in 1986 by Honda as an assembly-line worker. In 1997 he was discharged with chronic fatigue syndrome and consequently went on disability benefits until the insurer declared that he was fit to return to work. When he returned, the employer put him into its disability program, which required him to submit medical reports for every absence from work. The employer began to doubt the veracity of Mr. Keay’s doctor’s reports and, therefore, in 2000, ordered him to see a doctor it had selected. Mr. Keays obtained legal advice recommending that he not see the employer’s doctor unless the employer clearly indicated the purpose of the examination. The employer ignored the lawyer’s request and summarily dismissed Mr. Keays for cause (without notice) when he refused to meet with the employer’s doctor. The employer claimed that this was insubordination, entitling it to dismiss Mr. Keays without notice. Mr. Keays sued for wrongful dismissal. He…

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 2, Problem 8BCP

Summary Introduction

Case Summary: The person, AW, was employed as a collector for FCS. While attending a collection call, she informed a debtor that $15 processing fee was an “interest” charge. The information provided by her violated the company policy and AW was sacked. She claimed for unemployment benefits. The same was approved by MD Employment service. FCS objected to this approval and testified that AW made a false statement though she admitted the contrary. The agency found that AW’s termination of services could not be attributed to misconduct, which could deprive her of the benefits. MD Employment services approval was upheld by the reviewing court. Hence, FCS appealed.

To explain: The likelihood to uphold the findings of MD Employment services.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Honda Canada Inc. v. Keays, [2008] Mr. Keays was hired in 1986 by Honda as an assembly-line worker. In 1997 he was discharged with chronic fatigue syndrome and consequently went on disability benefits until the insurer declared that he was fit to return to work. When he returned, the employer put him into its disability program, which required him to submit medical reports for every absence from work. The employer began to doubt the veracity of Mr. Keay’s doctor’s reports and, therefore, in 2000, ordered him to see a doctor it had selected. Mr. Keays obtained legal advice recommending that he not see the employer’s doctor unless the employer clearly indicated the purpose of the examination. The employer ignored the lawyer’s request and summarily dismissed Mr. Keays for cause (without notice) when he refused to meet with the employer’s doctor. The employer claimed that this was insubordination, entitling it to dismiss Mr. Keays without notice. Mr. Keays sued for wrongful dismissal. He…

H. J., Inc., and other customers of Northwestern Bell Corp. alleged that Northwestern Bell had furnished cash and tickets for air travel, plays, and sporting events and had offered employment to members of the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission in exchange for favorable treatment in rate cases before the commission. A Minnesota statute makes it a felony to bribe public officials. H. J. and other customers brought suit against Northwestern for violating the criminal bribery statute. Can the customers bring a criminal action? [H. J., Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Corp., 420 N.W.2d 673 (Minn. App.)] Baker and others entered a Wal-Mart store shortly after 3:00 a.m. by cutting through the metal door with an acetylene torch. They had moved some of the merchandise in the store to the rear door, but the police arrived before the merchandise could be taken from the store. Baker was prosecuted for larceny. He raised the defense that he was not guilty of larceny because no merchandise had ever…

18-6. Discharge by Operation of Law. Dr. Jake Lambert signed an employment agreement with Baptist Health Services, Inc., to provide cardiothoracic surgery services to Baptist Memorial Hospital-North Mississippi, Inc., in Oxford, Mississippi. Complaints about Lambert's behavior arose almost immediately. He was evaluated by a team of doctors and psychologists, who diagnosed him as suffering from obsessive-compulsive personality disorder and concluded that he was unfit to practice medicine. Based on this conclusion, the hospital suspended his staff privileges. Citing the suspension, Baptist Health Services claimed that Lambert had breached his employment contract. What is Lambert's best defense to this claim? Explain. [Baptist Memorial Hospital-North Mississippi, Inc. v. Lambert, 157 So.3d 109 (Miss.App. 2015)] (See Discharge by Operation of Law.)