When the candidates promise the moon in pre-election time, what fundamental economic logic is swept under the brush and not mentioned by the candidates?

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 2, Problem 1E

To determine

When the candidates promise the moon in pre-election time, what fundamental economic logic is swept under the brush and not mentioned by the candidates?

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1E

The economic concept, 1) only that much of demand can be met for which resources are available and 2) normally resources are scarce, is ignored by the candidates when making pre-poll promises.

Explanation of Solution

Let us take the example of the fine business person that American President, Mr. Donald trump is. Before elections, Trump had promised to revive the business competitiveness. For this, he proposed corporate tax cut from substantial 35% to 21%. He went by his words and reduced the tax rate in his first term. Now let us see the likely results. Tax cuts mean greater profit for the companies. That is fine for the corporates. However, what is in store for the economy?

Tax cuts mean lower supply of disposable funds for the government. This translates to slackening of the economy owing to lesser spending by the government on essential nation building activities like infrastructure, social responsibilities, healthcare, military etc.

Again, when some pre-poll candidate is vowing to increase budget of healthcare, because the supply of money is limited, either that may lead to less expenditure in fields like infrastructure or increasing money supply by levying excess tax from companies or the common people. Demand (of voters) that can be met is a function of the available resources. Scarce supply cannot lead to greater supply of any commodity.

It is not that candidates do not understand the implication of the sky-high promises they make, if they were to execute them. However, the voters also play a part in these untenable statements by falling for it and electing that candidate.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

Anything in the economy is based on supply and demand. Abundant availability on the supply side is required to produce adequate goods. However, the candidates only seem to appease the demand of the voters in pre-election rallies. Whether the supply side is abundant enough to cater to that demand or the resource is actually scarce, is a point left for the to-be-formed government to tackle after the elections.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

not use ai please

Not use ai please

Exercise 6 Imagine that you head production of a multinational food processing company. The ongoing uncer- tainty about costs means that you are unsure of the future cost of one of your inputs, x2. Your firm's production function is y = f(x1, x2) = x²x²² The output price p is 1000, x1 = 27, and wx₁ = 60. 1. Suppose the current input price is Wx2 = 50. Solve for the optimal choice of x2. 2. Now suppose that the probability the input price remains 50 is 0.65 and the probability that Wx2 60 is 0.35. Solve for the optimal choice of x2. Round down to the nearest integer. = 3. Finally, suppose the costs do actually rise, i.e., Wx2 = 60. Calculate the difference in profit from the uncertainty in (2) vs. the certainty in (1).

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 2, Problem 1E

To determine

When the candidates promise the moon in pre-election time, what fundamental economic logic is swept under the brush and not mentioned by the candidates?

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1E

The economic concept, 1) only that much of demand can be met for which resources are available and 2) normally resources are scarce, is ignored by the candidates when making pre-poll promises.

Explanation of Solution

Let us take the example of the fine business person that American President, Mr. Donald trump is. Before elections, Trump had promised to revive the business competitiveness. For this, he proposed corporate tax cut from substantial 35% to 21%. He went by his words and reduced the tax rate in his first term. Now let us see the likely results. Tax cuts mean greater profit for the companies. That is fine for the corporates. However, what is in store for the economy?

Tax cuts mean lower supply of disposable funds for the government. This translates to slackening of the economy owing to lesser spending by the government on essential nation building activities like infrastructure, social responsibilities, healthcare, military etc.

Again, when some pre-poll candidate is vowing to increase budget of healthcare, because the supply of money is limited, either that may lead to less expenditure in fields like infrastructure or increasing money supply by levying excess tax from companies or the common people. Demand (of voters) that can be met is a function of the available resources. Scarce supply cannot lead to greater supply of any commodity.

It is not that candidates do not understand the implication of the sky-high promises they make, if they were to execute them. However, the voters also play a part in these untenable statements by falling for it and electing that candidate.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

Anything in the economy is based on supply and demand. Abundant availability on the supply side is required to produce adequate goods. However, the candidates only seem to appease the demand of the voters in pre-election rallies. Whether the supply side is abundant enough to cater to that demand or the resource is actually scarce, is a point left for the to-be-formed government to tackle after the elections.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 2, Problem 1E

To determine

When the candidates promise the moon in pre-election time, what fundamental economic logic is swept under the brush and not mentioned by the candidates?

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1E

The economic concept, 1) only that much of demand can be met for which resources are available and 2) normally resources are scarce, is ignored by the candidates when making pre-poll promises.

Explanation of Solution

Let us take the example of the fine business person that American President, Mr. Donald trump is. Before elections, Trump had promised to revive the business competitiveness. For this, he proposed corporate tax cut from substantial 35% to 21%. He went by his words and reduced the tax rate in his first term. Now let us see the likely results. Tax cuts mean greater profit for the companies. That is fine for the corporates. However, what is in store for the economy?

Tax cuts mean lower supply of disposable funds for the government. This translates to slackening of the economy owing to lesser spending by the government on essential nation building activities like infrastructure, social responsibilities, healthcare, military etc.

Again, when some pre-poll candidate is vowing to increase budget of healthcare, because the supply of money is limited, either that may lead to less expenditure in fields like infrastructure or increasing money supply by levying excess tax from companies or the common people. Demand (of voters) that can be met is a function of the available resources. Scarce supply cannot lead to greater supply of any commodity.

It is not that candidates do not understand the implication of the sky-high promises they make, if they were to execute them. However, the voters also play a part in these untenable statements by falling for it and electing that candidate.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

Anything in the economy is based on supply and demand. Abundant availability on the supply side is required to produce adequate goods. However, the candidates only seem to appease the demand of the voters in pre-election rallies. Whether the supply side is abundant enough to cater to that demand or the resource is actually scarce, is a point left for the to-be-formed government to tackle after the elections.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 2, Problem 1E

To determine

When the candidates promise the moon in pre-election time, what fundamental economic logic is swept under the brush and not mentioned by the candidates?

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1E

The economic concept, 1) only that much of demand can be met for which resources are available and 2) normally resources are scarce, is ignored by the candidates when making pre-poll promises.

Explanation of Solution

Let us take the example of the fine business person that American President, Mr. Donald trump is. Before elections, Trump had promised to revive the business competitiveness. For this, he proposed corporate tax cut from substantial 35% to 21%. He went by his words and reduced the tax rate in his first term. Now let us see the likely results. Tax cuts mean greater profit for the companies. That is fine for the corporates. However, what is in store for the economy?

Tax cuts mean lower supply of disposable funds for the government. This translates to slackening of the economy owing to lesser spending by the government on essential nation building activities like infrastructure, social responsibilities, healthcare, military etc.

Again, when some pre-poll candidate is vowing to increase budget of healthcare, because the supply of money is limited, either that may lead to less expenditure in fields like infrastructure or increasing money supply by levying excess tax from companies or the common people. Demand (of voters) that can be met is a function of the available resources. Scarce supply cannot lead to greater supply of any commodity.

It is not that candidates do not understand the implication of the sky-high promises they make, if they were to execute them. However, the voters also play a part in these untenable statements by falling for it and electing that candidate.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

Anything in the economy is based on supply and demand. Abundant availability on the supply side is required to produce adequate goods. However, the candidates only seem to appease the demand of the voters in pre-election rallies. Whether the supply side is abundant enough to cater to that demand or the resource is actually scarce, is a point left for the to-be-formed government to tackle after the elections.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 2, Problem 1E

To determine

When the candidates promise the moon in pre-election time, what fundamental economic logic is swept under the brush and not mentioned by the candidates?

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1E

The economic concept, 1) only that much of demand can be met for which resources are available and 2) normally resources are scarce, is ignored by the candidates when making pre-poll promises.

Explanation of Solution

Let us take the example of the fine business person that American President, Mr. Donald trump is. Before elections, Trump had promised to revive the business competitiveness. For this, he proposed corporate tax cut from substantial 35% to 21%. He went by his words and reduced the tax rate in his first term. Now let us see the likely results. Tax cuts mean greater profit for the companies. That is fine for the corporates. However, what is in store for the economy?

Tax cuts mean lower supply of disposable funds for the government. This translates to slackening of the economy owing to lesser spending by the government on essential nation building activities like infrastructure, social responsibilities, healthcare, military etc.

Again, when some pre-poll candidate is vowing to increase budget of healthcare, because the supply of money is limited, either that may lead to less expenditure in fields like infrastructure or increasing money supply by levying excess tax from companies or the common people. Demand (of voters) that can be met is a function of the available resources. Scarce supply cannot lead to greater supply of any commodity.

It is not that candidates do not understand the implication of the sky-high promises they make, if they were to execute them. However, the voters also play a part in these untenable statements by falling for it and electing that candidate.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

Anything in the economy is based on supply and demand. Abundant availability on the supply side is required to produce adequate goods. However, the candidates only seem to appease the demand of the voters in pre-election rallies. Whether the supply side is abundant enough to cater to that demand or the resource is actually scarce, is a point left for the to-be-formed government to tackle after the elections.

Answer 6

Chapter 2, Problem 1E

To determine

When the candidates promise the moon in pre-election time, what fundamental economic logic is swept under the brush and not mentioned by the candidates?

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1E

The economic concept, 1) only that much of demand can be met for which resources are available and 2) normally resources are scarce, is ignored by the candidates when making pre-poll promises.

Explanation of Solution

Let us take the example of the fine business person that American President, Mr. Donald trump is. Before elections, Trump had promised to revive the business competitiveness. For this, he proposed corporate tax cut from substantial 35% to 21%. He went by his words and reduced the tax rate in his first term. Now let us see the likely results. Tax cuts mean greater profit for the companies. That is fine for the corporates. However, what is in store for the economy?

Tax cuts mean lower supply of disposable funds for the government. This translates to slackening of the economy owing to lesser spending by the government on essential nation building activities like infrastructure, social responsibilities, healthcare, military etc.

Again, when some pre-poll candidate is vowing to increase budget of healthcare, because the supply of money is limited, either that may lead to less expenditure in fields like infrastructure or increasing money supply by levying excess tax from companies or the common people. Demand (of voters) that can be met is a function of the available resources. Scarce supply cannot lead to greater supply of any commodity.

It is not that candidates do not understand the implication of the sky-high promises they make, if they were to execute them. However, the voters also play a part in these untenable statements by falling for it and electing that candidate.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

Anything in the economy is based on supply and demand. Abundant availability on the supply side is required to produce adequate goods. However, the candidates only seem to appease the demand of the voters in pre-election rallies. Whether the supply side is abundant enough to cater to that demand or the resource is actually scarce, is a point left for the to-be-formed government to tackle after the elections.

Answer 7

Chapter 2, Problem 1E

To determine

When the candidates promise the moon in pre-election time, what fundamental economic logic is swept under the brush and not mentioned by the candidates?

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1E

The economic concept, 1) only that much of demand can be met for which resources are available and 2) normally resources are scarce, is ignored by the candidates when making pre-poll promises.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Explanation of Solution

Let us take the example of the fine business person that American President, Mr. Donald trump is. Before elections, Trump had promised to revive the business competitiveness. For this, he proposed corporate tax cut from substantial 35% to 21%. He went by his words and reduced the tax rate in his first term. Now let us see the likely results. Tax cuts mean greater profit for the companies. That is fine for the corporates. However, what is in store for the economy?

Tax cuts mean lower supply of disposable funds for the government. This translates to slackening of the economy owing to lesser spending by the government on essential nation building activities like infrastructure, social responsibilities, healthcare, military etc.

Again, when some pre-poll candidate is vowing to increase budget of healthcare, because the supply of money is limited, either that may lead to less expenditure in fields like infrastructure or increasing money supply by levying excess tax from companies or the common people. Demand (of voters) that can be met is a function of the available resources. Scarce supply cannot lead to greater supply of any commodity.

It is not that candidates do not understand the implication of the sky-high promises they make, if they were to execute them. However, the voters also play a part in these untenable statements by falling for it and electing that candidate.

Answer 12

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

Anything in the economy is based on supply and demand. Abundant availability on the supply side is required to produce adequate goods. However, the candidates only seem to appease the demand of the voters in pre-election rallies. Whether the supply side is abundant enough to cater to that demand or the resource is actually scarce, is a point left for the to-be-formed government to tackle after the elections.

Answer 13

Ch. 2 - Prob. 1E Ch. 2 - Prob. 2E Ch. 2 - Prob. 3E Ch. 2 - Prob. 4E Ch. 2 - Prob. 5E Ch. 2 - Prob. 6E Ch. 2 - Prob. 7E Ch. 2 - Prob. 8E Ch. 2 - Prob. 9E Ch. 2 - Prob. 10E

When the candidates promise the moon in pre-election time, what fundamental economic logic is swept under the brush and not mentioned by the candidates?

When the candidates promise the moon in pre-election time, what fundamental economic logic is swept under the brush and not mentioned by the candidates?

Answer to Problem 1E

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 2 Solutions