Bam!— Apollo 15 Lands on the Moon The first word spoken on the surface of the Moon after Apollo 15 landed on July 30, 1971, was “Bam!” This was James Irwin’s involuntary reaction to their rather bone-jarring touchdown. “We did hit harder than any of the other flights!” says Irwin. “And I was startled, obviously, when I said. Bam!’" The reason for the “firm touchdown” of Apollo 15, as pilot David Scott later characterized it, was that the rocket engine was shut off a bit earlier than planned, when the lander was still 4.30 ft above the lunar surface and moving downward with a speed of 0.500 ft/s. From that point on the lander descended in lunar free fall, with an acceleration of 1.62 m/s 2 . As a result, the landing speed of Apollo 15 was by far the largest of any of the Apollo missions In comparison, Neil Armstrong s landing speed on Apollo 11 was the lowest at 1.7 ft/s—he didn’t shut off the engine until the footpads were actually on the surface. Apollos 12 , 14 , and 17 all landed with speeds between 3.0 and 3.5 ft/s. To better understand the descent of Apollo 15, we show its trajectory during the final stages of landing in Figure 2-47 (a) In Figure 2-47 (b) we show a variety of speed-versus-time plots. (a) (b) FIGURE 2-4 7 Problems 108, 109, 110, and 111 109. •• What was the impact speed of the lander when it touched down? Give your answer in feet per second (ft/s), the same units used by the astronauts. A. A. 2.41 ft/s B. B 6.78 ft/s C. C. 9.95 ft/s D. D. 10.6 ft/s
Bam!— Apollo 15 Lands on the Moon The first word spoken on the surface of the Moon after Apollo 15 landed on July 30, 1971, was “Bam!” This was James Irwin’s involuntary reaction to their rather bone-jarring touchdown. “We did hit harder than any of the other flights!” says Irwin. “And I was startled, obviously, when I said. Bam!’" The reason for the “firm touchdown” of Apollo 15, as pilot David Scott later characterized it, was that the rocket engine was shut off a bit earlier than planned, when the lander was still 4.30 ft above the lunar surface and moving downward with a speed of 0.500 ft/s. From that point on the lander descended in lunar free fall, with an acceleration of 1.62 m/s 2 . As a result, the landing speed of Apollo 15 was by far the largest of any of the Apollo missions In comparison, Neil Armstrong s landing speed on Apollo 11 was the lowest at 1.7 ft/s—he didn’t shut off the engine until the footpads were actually on the surface. Apollos 12 , 14 , and 17 all landed with speeds between 3.0 and 3.5 ft/s. To better understand the descent of Apollo 15, we show its trajectory during the final stages of landing in Figure 2-47 (a) In Figure 2-47 (b) we show a variety of speed-versus-time plots. (a) (b) FIGURE 2-4 7 Problems 108, 109, 110, and 111 109. •• What was the impact speed of the lander when it touched down? Give your answer in feet per second (ft/s), the same units used by the astronauts. A. A. 2.41 ft/s B. B 6.78 ft/s C. C. 9.95 ft/s D. D. 10.6 ft/s
The first word spoken on the surface of the Moon after Apollo 15 landed on July 30, 1971, was “Bam!” This was James Irwin’s involuntary reaction to their rather bone-jarring touchdown. “We did hit harder than any of the other flights!” says Irwin. “And I was startled, obviously, when I said. Bam!’"
The reason for the “firm touchdown” of Apollo 15, as pilot David Scott later characterized it, was that the rocket engine was shut off a bit earlier than planned, when the lander was still 4.30 ft above the lunar surface and moving downward with a speed of 0.500 ft/s. From that point on the lander descended in lunar free fall, with an acceleration of 1.62 m/s2. As a result, the landing speed of Apollo 15 was by far the largest of any of the Apollo missions In comparison, Neil Armstrong s landing speed on Apollo 11 was the lowest at 1.7 ft/s—he didn’t shut off the engine until the footpads were actually on the surface. Apollos 12, 14, and 17 all landed with speeds between 3.0 and 3.5 ft/s.
To better understand the descent of Apollo 15, we show its trajectory during the final stages of landing in Figure 2-47 (a) In Figure 2-47 (b) we show a variety of speed-versus-time plots.
(a)
(b)
FIGURE 2-47
Problems 108, 109, 110, and 111
109. •• What was the impact speed of the lander when it touched down? Give your answer in feet per second (ft/s), the same units used by the astronauts.
For items 8-9, refer to the problem below.
Find all the currents flowing in every resistor, power dissipation in
every resistor and the total power of the circuit shown at the right
using...
8. Kirchhoff's Laws (5 pts)
9. Maxwell's Mesh Analysis (5 pts)
A
8 V
10 V
B
+
20 Ω
3Ω
202
wwww
C
wwww
202
+
50
www
12 V
•
Nature of Resistance
Temperature-Resistance Relationship
Ohm's Law, Energy and Power
Kirchhoff's Law
• Maxwell's Mesh Analysis
1. A coil of copper wire (p = 10.37 2-cmil/ft) has a length of 600 ft. What is the length of an aluminum conductor
(p 17 cmil/ft), if its cross-sectional area and resistance are the same as those of the copper coil? (Hint: Look
for conversion of inches to mils and square inches to square foot. Include it in your solution.) (1 pt)
2. The copper field winding of an electric machine has a resistance of 46 at temperature of 22°C. What will be
its resistance at 75°C? (Use do = 0.00427 /°C for copper) (1 pt)
3. The resistivity of a copper rod 50 ft long and 0.25 inch in diameter is 1.76 μ at 20°C. What is its resistance at -
20°C? (1 pt)
4. When two resistors A and B are connected in series, the total resistance is 36 2. When connected in parallel, the
total resistance is 8 Q. What is the ratio of the resistance RA to resistance RB? Assume RA < RB. (1 pt)
5. The…
2. Two equally strong individuals, wearing
exactly the same shoes decide to do a tug of
war. The only difference is individual A is
2.5 meters tall and individual B is 1.5 meter
tall. Who is more likely to win the tug of
war?
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, physics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.