Person TH, along with his wife, entered into a contract with T, the representative of firm H for the renovation of their house. When a contractual dispute arose, firm H’s name came out to be imaginary. Person TH sued person T for non-disclosure of full information and a breach of contract. To find: The personal liability of T.

Question

Sheila owned an old roadside building that she believed could be easily converted into an antique shop. She talked to her friend Barbara, an antique fancier, and they executed the following written agreement: a. Sheila would supply the building, all utilities, and $100,000 capital for purchasing antiques. b. Barbara would supply $30,000 for purchasing antiques, Sheila would repay her when the business terminated. c. Barbara would manage the shop, make all purchases, and receive a salary of $500 per week plus 5 percent of the gross receipts. d. Fifty percent of the net profits would go into the purchase of new stock. The balance of the net profits would go to Sheila. e. The business would operate under the name “Roadside Antiques.” Business went poorly, and after one year, a debt of $40,000 is owed to Old Fashioned, Inc., the principal supplier of antiques purchased by Barbara in the name of Roadside Antiques. Old Fashioned sues Roadside Antiques, and Sheila and Barbara as partners.…

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 19, Problem 3BCP

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Person TH, along with his wife, entered into a contract with T, the representative of firm H for the renovation of their house. When a contractual dispute arose, firm H’s name came out to be imaginary. Person TH sued person T for non-disclosure of full information and a breach of contract.

To find: The personal liability of T.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Sheila owned an old roadside building that she believed could be easily converted into an antique shop. She talked to her friend Barbara, an antique fancier, and they executed the following written agreement: a. Sheila would supply the building, all utilities, and $100,000 capital for purchasing antiques. b. Barbara would supply $30,000 for purchasing antiques, Sheila would repay her when the business terminated. c. Barbara would manage the shop, make all purchases, and receive a salary of $500 per week plus 5 percent of the gross receipts. d. Fifty percent of the net profits would go into the purchase of new stock. The balance of the net profits would go to Sheila. e. The business would operate under the name “Roadside Antiques.” Business went poorly, and after one year, a debt of $40,000 is owed to Old Fashioned, Inc., the principal supplier of antiques purchased by Barbara in the name of Roadside Antiques. Old Fashioned sues Roadside Antiques, and Sheila and Barbara as partners.…

Ming entered into a contract with Lee to supply Lee with smuggled cigarettes. Lee received the smuggled cigarettes and tried to sell them off at a profit. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Lee could not find any buyer for the smuggled cigarettes. Without any profit, Lee was unable to pay Ming the outstanding sum under their contract. Required: Analyse whether Ming is entitled to seek assistance from the court to claim back the outstanding sum under the contract from Lee. Support your discussion with relevant legal principles and cases, if any.

1. Roy asked Mark if he can use his phone for a week. If Roy agreed and allowed Mark to use his phone, what contract is created? Explain 2. Lance borrowed money from Renz. There was no stipulation to pay interest. Has Renz the right to demand interest? Explain