Bundle: The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th + Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337374835
Author: CROSS
Publisher: CENGAGE L
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 19, Problem 1RE
Summary Introduction
Case s ummary :Person B hired person S to assist him in selling insurance for his company MLC. B found that S was simultaneously selling the insurance of another company PLC. B withheld the client’s contact information from S and terminated the contract. S brought a suit against B for loss in sale and commissions.
To find :The principal and the agent in the given scenario.
Expert Solution
Explanation of Solution
An agent can be an independent contractor or an employee of a company. The court considers the status of a worker on the basis of the degree of control exercised by the principal over him. Less control indicates that an agent is an independent contractor while more control indicates that the agent is an employee. In the given case, B hired S for assisting him in selling insurance for his company. Therefore, B is the principal and S is the agent in the given case.
Summary Introduction
Case summary: Person B hired person S to assist him in selling insurance for his company MLC. B found that S was simultaneously selling the insurance of another company PLC. B withheld the client’s contact information from S and terminated the contract. S brought a suit against B for loss in sale and commissions.
To find: The method by which the agency relationship was formed.
Expert Solution
Explanation of Solution
An agency can be formed by voluntary consent or by agreement between the parties. In this case, the agency relationship was formed by an agreement between B and S, where B was hired to assist S in selling the life insurance for MLC.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
Ms. T who was employed with Catamaran Inc. was caught in the act of stealing the company property of her employer. When Ms. T admitted to the commission of the said act to her manager, the latter advised her to just tender her resignation; otherwise, she would face an investigation which would likely lead to the termination of her employment and the filing of criminal charges in court.
In the letter of dismissal, the employer also stated that Ms. T qualifications was not as good as those of the other employees and that when the company held a party in her honour for 20 years of service to the company, that she drank too much and had to be taken home by the company’s driver.
Acting on her manager’s advice, Ms. T submitted a letter of resignation. Later on, Ms. T filed a case for constructive dismissal against her employer. While Ms. T conceded that her manager spoke to her in a calm and unforceful manner, she claimed that her resignation was not completely voluntary because she was told…
Ms. T who was employed with Catamaran Inc. was caught in the act of stealing the company property of her employer. When Ms. T admitted to the commission of the said act to her manager, the latter advised her to just tender her resignation; otherwise, she would face an investigation which would likely lead to the termination of her employment and the filing of criminal charges in court.
In the letter of dismissal, the employer also stated that Ms. T qualifications was not as good as those of the other employees and that when the company held a party in her honour for 20 years of service to the company, that she drank too much and had to be taken home by the company’s driver.
Acting on her manager’s advice, Ms. T submitted a letter of resignation. Later on, Ms. T filed a case for constructive dismissal against her employer. While Ms. T conceded that her manager spoke to her in a calm and unforceful manner, she claimed that her resignation was not completely voluntary because she was told…
William Schmalz entered into an employment contract with Hardy Salt Company. The contract granted Schmalz six months’ severance pay for involuntary termination but none for voluntary separation or termination for cause. Schmalz was asked to resign from his employment. He was informed that if he did not resign, he would be fired for alleged misconduct. When Schmalz turned in his letter of resignation, he signed a release prohibiting him from suing his former employer as a consequence of his employment. Schmalz consulted an attorney before signing the release and upon signing it received $4,583 (one month’s salary) in consideration. Schmalz now sues his former employer for the severance pay, claiming that he signed the release under duress. Is Schmalz correct in his assertion?
Chapter 19 Solutions
Bundle: The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th + Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, subject and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- James incorporated a business, J Wine & Bar. He hired his friend, Douglas, to act as bouncer during nighttime service. Ricky, who is an IT professional, went to a bar to unwind from the stress and pressure of work. With pity misunderstanding with the bar’s crew, he was told to leave by the bouncer. Without provocation with the bouncer, he suffered a beating and fractured nose. The supervisor supported the action of the bouncer and said that he has the right to use force which he deemed necessary to persuade Ricky to leave the premises. Please comment on the issues of trespass, assault, battery, and and vicarious liability, if there is any.arrow_forwardCreate a cover letter for employment.arrow_forwardAnne, who was unemployed, registered with the Speedy Employment Agency. A contract was then made under which Anne, in consideration of such position as the Agency would obtain for her, agreed to pay the Agency one-half of her first month’s salary. The contract also contained an assignment by Anne to the Agency of onehalf of her first month’s salary. Two weeks later, the Agency obtained a permanent position for Anne with the Bostwick Co. at a monthly salary of $1,900. The agency also notified Bostwick of the assignment by Anne. At the end of the first month, Bostwick paid Anne her salary in full. Anne then quit and disappeared. The Agency now sues Bostwick Co. for $950 under the assignment. Who will prevail? Explain.arrow_forward
- Provide a circumstance and explanation of how the "employment at will" doctrine is not applicable.arrow_forwardBrandt Crossing Investments, Inc., was a family-owned property investment organization, investing in undeveloped properties when prices were low and then selling them when prices went up. Among its holdings, Brandt Crossing owned fifty acres of undeveloped land next to another fifty acres of undeveloped land owned by Khloe Hadid. Carter Rios, property manager for Brandt Crossing, approached Hadid and offered to purchase her fifty acres “for Brandt.” Hadid sold the property for $50,000. Within one year, Brandt Crossing sold its 100 acres, including the property bought from Hadid, to a developer for $1,000,000. Richard Brandt, a 5% owner of Brandt Crossing Investments and an old high school acquaintance of Hadid, saw her at the mall and told her of the recent sale. Furious that she had lost out on the income and convinced that Rios had misled her, Hadid sued Richard Brandt for the acts of his agent, Rios. Hadid argued that the facts were sufficient to create an agency by estoppel…arrow_forwardAfter the untimely death of his partner Anthony Autumn, Scott Schroder continued his San Francisco agency under the name of Scott Schroder. Several years later, one Sarah Schroder visited his office claiming to be his daughter. Sarah demanded that Scott make him a partner in his agency, but Scott refused. Scott told Sarah, "I’ll never take on another partner as long as I can walk. But if you want to work for me, I’ll buy you a yellow trench coat and all pens you want and pay you $20 a week plus expenses and 20% of the profits." Scott Schroder continued to carry on the agency’s business in the name of Scott Schroder. Nevertheless, when occasional bills arrived in the name of Schroder & Schroder, he was as likely to pay those bills as any others. Sarah never complained. Maybe some day he’ll really treat me like a partner after all, she mused. Ten years later, Scott is often absent from work and when he is there doesn't do any work. Business fell off quickly and creditors began to…arrow_forward
- Lend Co. discovered that one of its employees, Dana, is an alcoholic. Her manager realized that Dana's alcoholism must be the reason for her absenteeism. To help Dana overcome her alcoholiśm, the employer provided her with counseling services and also asked her to make a firm choice between treatment and discipline. Lend Co. also offered outpatient treatment, and Dana participated in the program without success. When all of these efforts failed, Lend Co. offered to provide inpatient treatment, and Dana refused. Lend Co. fired Dana. According to the courts: O A. Dana has a valid claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act because she willingly participated in the outpatient treatment, even though it did not produce positive results. O B. Lend Co. is not liable under the Americans with Disabilities Act because it offered a reasonable accommodation, and Dana refused. O C. Lend Co, is liable under the Americans with Disabilities Act because it failed to offer Dana time off from…arrow_forwardEl Dorado Tire Company fired Bill Ballard, a sales executive. Ballard had a five-year contract with El Dorado but was fired after only two years of employment. Ballard sued El Dorado for breach of contract. El Dorado claimed that any damages due to breach of the contract should be mitigated because of Ballard’s failure to seek other employment after he was fired. El Dorado did not provide any proof showing the availability of comparable employment. Explain whether El Dorado is correct in its contention.arrow_forwardChristina Haley of Elko, Nevada, age 57, recently suffered a stroke. She was in intensive care for 3 days and was hospitalized for 10 more days. Her total bill for this care was $133,000. After being discharged from the hospital, she spent 25 days in nursing home at a cost of $240 per day. Christina, who earns $4,500 per month, missed two months of work. Christina had a health insurance plan through her employer. The policy had a $1,000 deductible and an 80/20 coinsurance clause with a $2,000 coinsurance cap. She had also accumulated 21 sick days (equivalent to one month) at work. Otherwise she had no long-term care or disability income insurance. Round your answers to the nearest dollar. a. How much of Christina's direct medical expenses was paid by her insurance policy? $ b. What did Christina have to pay for her nursing home care? $ c. How much income did Christina lose? $arrow_forward
- sanjayarrow_forwardCompare the differences and similarities of indefinite employment, contract employment, and at will employment.arrow_forwardSheila owned an old roadside building that she believed could be easily converted into an antique shop. She talked to her friend Barbara, an antique fancier, and they executed the following written agreement: a. Sheila would supply the building, all utilities, and $100,000 capital for purchasing antiques. b. Barbara would supply $30,000 for purchasing antiques, Sheila would repay her when the business terminated. c. Barbara would manage the shop, make all purchases, and receive a salary of $500 per week plus 5 percent of the gross receipts. d. Fifty percent of the net profits would go into the purchase of new stock. The balance of the net profits would go to Sheila. e. The business would operate under the name “Roadside Antiques.” Business went poorly, and after one year, a debt of $40,000 is owed to Old Fashioned, Inc., the principal supplier of antiques purchased by Barbara in the name of Roadside Antiques. Old Fashioned sues Roadside Antiques, and Sheila and Barbara as partners.…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education