Company K maintains a rehabilitation center WG. Person L was admitted to the center for knee replacement surgery and person Y signed the admission form on her behalf. The form will be given for compulsory arbitration in case of any dispute. Person L filed a lawsuit against K for negligence. To find: The chances of compulsory arbitration in the given case.

Question

Teresa and Kensington enter into an employment contract that contains an unenforceable arbitration clause. Teresa sues Kensington, but Kensington wants the contract to remain effective. How can the court rule that the contract is still valid? a. If the contract contains an integration clause, the court may delete the unenforceable clause and enforce the rest of the contract. b. If the contract contains boilerplate, the court may delete the unenforceable clause and enforce the rest of the contract. C. If the contract contains a severability clause, the court may delete the unenforceable clause and enforce the rest of the contract. d. If the contract contains representations and warranties, the court may delete the unenforceable clause and enforce the rest of the contract.

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 19, Problem 7BCP

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Company K maintains a rehabilitation center WG. Person L was admitted to the center for knee replacement surgery and person Y signed the admission form on her behalf. The form will be given for compulsory arbitration in case of any dispute. Person L filed a lawsuit against K for negligence.

To find: The chances of compulsory arbitration in the given case.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Teresa and Kensington enter into an employment contract that contains an unenforceable arbitration clause. Teresa sues Kensington, but Kensington wants the contract to remain effective. How can the court rule that the contract is still valid? a. If the contract contains an integration clause, the court may delete the unenforceable clause and enforce the rest of the contract. b. If the contract contains boilerplate, the court may delete the unenforceable clause and enforce the rest of the contract. C. If the contract contains a severability clause, the court may delete the unenforceable clause and enforce the rest of the contract. d. If the contract contains representations and warranties, the court may delete the unenforceable clause and enforce the rest of the contract.

Deran Cody, a U.S. citizen, married Isolde Trieste, a Portuguese citizen, who came to the U.S. in September 2021 as a tourist to visit her sister. Deran earned $81,000 and Isolde had no U.S. or Portuguese income. Neither Deran or Isolde is a dependent of anyone else. A Form W-7 should be filed for Isolde because she: Qualifies as a resident alien under the substantial presence test. Is a qualifying relative of her sister. Is the qualifying person of a resident spouse, so Deran can claim the head of household filing status. Can make a spousal election to be considered a U.S. resident for tax purposes.

Breezy Company in Chicago offers a driving job to Sam, who lives in Myrtle Beach, SC. Sam orally agrees to work for Breezy for four years. He sells his home, moves his family to Chicago and begins work. Three months later, he is fired for no stated cause. He files a lawsuit against Breezy for reinstatement or pay. Breezy argues that the contract was not in writing and therefore is not enforceable. In whose favor is the court likely to rule, and what legal concept supports your theory?