Concept explainers
a)
To solve: The linear programming problem and answer the given questions.
Introduction:
Linear programming:
Linear programming is a mathematical modelling method where a linear function is maximized or minimized taking into consideration the various constraints present in the problem. It is useful in making quantitative decisions in business planning.
a)
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Calculation of coordinates for each constraint and objective function:
Constraint 1:
Constraint 2:
Objective function:
The problem is solved with iso-profit line method.
Graph:
(1) Optimal value of the decision variables and Z:
The coordinates for the profit line is (6, 8). The profit line is moved away from the origin. The highest point at which the profit line intersects in the feasible region will be the optimum solution. The following equation are solved as simultaneous equation to find optimum solution.
Solving (1)and (2)we get,
The values are substituted in the objective function to find the objective function value.
Optimal solution:
(2)
None of the constraints are having slack. Both the ≤ constraints are binding.
(3)
There are no ≥ constraints. Hence, none of the constraints have surplus.
(4)
There are no redundant constraints.
b)
To solve: The linear programming problem and answer the questions.
Introduction:
Linear programming:
Linear programming is a mathematical modelling method where a linear function is maximized or minimized taking into consideration the various constraints present in the problem. It is useful in making quantitative decisions in business planning.
b)
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Calculation of coordinates for each constraint and objective function:
Constraint 1:
Constraint 2:
Constraint 3:
Objective function:
The problem is solved with iso-profit line method.
Graph:
(1) Optimal value of the decision variables and Z:
The coordinates for the profit line is (10, 2). The profit line is moved away from the origin. The highest point at which the profit line intersects in the feasible region will be the optimum solution. The following equations are solved as simultaneous equation to find optimum solution.
Solving (1)and (2)we get,
The values are substituted in the objective function to find the objective function value.
Optimal solution:
(2)
None of the constraints are having slack. The time constraint has ≤ and it is binding.
(3)
Durability and strength constraints have ≥ in them. The durability constraint is binding and has no surplus. The strength constraint has surplus as shown below:
The surplus is 15 (39 -24).
(4)
There are no redundant constraints.
c)
To solve: The linear programming problem and answer the questions.
Introduction:
Linear programming:
Linear programming is a mathematical modelling method where a linear function is maximized or minimized taking into consideration the various constraints present in the problem. It is useful in making quantitative decisions in business planning.
c)
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Calculation of coordinates for each constraint and objective function:
Constraint 1:
Constraint 2:
Constraint 3:
Objective function:
The problem is solved with iso-profit line method.
Graph:
(1) Optimal value of the decision variables and Z:
The coordinates for the profit line is (20, 40). The profit line is moved away from the origin. The highest point at which the profit line intersects in the feasible region will be the optimum solution. The following equation are solved as simultaneous equation to find optimum solution.
Solving (1) and (2) we get,
The values are substituted in the objective function to find the objective function value.
Optimal solution:
(2)
The material and machinery constraint has ≤ and it is binding and has zero slack. The labor constraint has slack as shown below:
The slack is 120 (1,200 – 1,080).
(3)
There are no constraints with ≥. Hence, no constraints have surplus.
(4)
There are no redundant constraints
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 19 Solutions
Operations Management (Comp. Instructor's Edition)
- The Tinkan Company produces one-pound cans for the Canadian salmon industry. Each year the salmon spawn during a 24-hour period and must be canned immediately. Tinkan has the following agreement with the salmon industry. The company can deliver as many cans as it chooses. Then the salmon are caught. For each can by which Tinkan falls short of the salmon industrys needs, the company pays the industry a 2 penalty. Cans cost Tinkan 1 to produce and are sold by Tinkan for 2 per can. If any cans are left over, they are returned to Tinkan and the company reimburses the industry 2 for each extra can. These extra cans are put in storage for next year. Each year a can is held in storage, a carrying cost equal to 20% of the cans production cost is incurred. It is well known that the number of salmon harvested during a year is strongly related to the number of salmon harvested the previous year. In fact, using past data, Tinkan estimates that the harvest size in year t, Ht (measured in the number of cans required), is related to the harvest size in the previous year, Ht1, by the equation Ht = Ht1et where et is normally distributed with mean 1.02 and standard deviation 0.10. Tinkan plans to use the following production strategy. For some value of x, it produces enough cans at the beginning of year t to bring its inventory up to x+Ht, where Ht is the predicted harvest size in year t. Then it delivers these cans to the salmon industry. For example, if it uses x = 100,000, the predicted harvest size is 500,000 cans, and 80,000 cans are already in inventory, then Tinkan produces and delivers 520,000 cans. Given that the harvest size for the previous year was 550,000 cans, use simulation to help Tinkan develop a production strategy that maximizes its expected profit over the next 20 years. Assume that the company begins year 1 with an initial inventory of 300,000 cans.arrow_forwardIt costs a pharmaceutical company 75,000 to produce a 1000-pound batch of a drug. The average yield from a batch is unknown but the best case is 90% yield (that is, 900 pounds of good drug will be produced), the most likely case is 85% yield, and the worst case is 70% yield. The annual demand for the drug is unknown, with the best case being 20,000 pounds, the most likely case 17,500 pounds, and the worst case 10,000 pounds. The drug sells for 125 per pound and leftover amounts of the drug can be sold for 30 per pound. To maximize annual expected profit, how many batches of the drug should the company produce? You can assume that it will produce the batches only once, before demand for the drug is known.arrow_forwardAssume the demand for a companys drug Wozac during the current year is 50,000, and assume demand will grow at 5% a year. If the company builds a plant that can produce x units of Wozac per year, it will cost 16x. Each unit of Wozac is sold for 3. Each unit of Wozac produced incurs a variable production cost of 0.20. It costs 0.40 per year to operate a unit of capacity. Determine how large a Wozac plant the company should build to maximize its expected profit over the next 10 years.arrow_forward
- Jawad has calculated the possible profits from three different scenarios for the expansion of his restaurant, each for a different amount of advertising and promotion. He has chosen to implement the scenario that offers the greatest profit. Jawad has decided to a. minimin O b. minimnax c. maximax d. maximinarrow_forwardrarrow_forwardDon't solve. Please give- Decision Variable Constraint Objective functionarrow_forward
- Millie wants to install a new carpet in the living room of her house. She calculated the square footage of the room and then multiplied it by a set cost factor to estimate the cost. This is an example of_________ Group of answer choices Parametric estimating Three-point estimating Bottom-up estimating Analogous estimatingarrow_forwardPls help ASAP for botharrow_forwardI need typing clear urjent no chatgpt use i will give 5 upvotesarrow_forward
- Calculating outcomes as equally likely would BEST describe: O a. Maximax criterion O b. Laplace criterion O c. Regret criterion Od. Maximin criterion Determining the average payoff for each alternative and choosing the one with the BEST payoff is the approach called: ea, maximax O b. minimax regret O c. laplace Od maximin Marrow_forwardSolve the following problem with Excel Solver: (Leave no cells blank be certain to enter "0" wherever required. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to 2 decimal places.) Maximize Z= 3X+17Y 3X+8Ys 74 3X+11Y ≤ 78 Y s 35 Decision for X Decision for Y Total profit Resource A Resource B Resource C Resources Used Resource A Resource B Resource Carrow_forward4. Optimal Rental Decisions in Cloud Computing Assume that AWS has the following 3 options for renting servers. Fraction of Job in one Server Description Rental Low Power Medium Power High Power $2/hr. $4/hr. $9/hr. Hour 1/8 1/6 1/3 L M Note that if you rent a server for less than one hour, you still must pay the rent for the entire hour. You have a job that must finısh in at most 5 hours. The low-power server can finish 1/8th of the job in 1 hour, the medium-power server can finish 1/6 of the job in one hour, and the high- power server can finish 1/3rd of the job in one hour. (a) The typical practice used by most firms is to find a single server that can do the work at the least cost and within the available time. Find the best sıngle server solution-that is, which single server should you use and for how many hours will you rent this server?arrow_forward
- Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,