
Concept explainers
a)
To solve: The linear programming problem and answer the given questions.
Introduction:
Linear programming:
Linear programming is a mathematical modelling method where a linear function is maximized or minimized taking into consideration the various constraints present in the problem. It is useful in making quantitative decisions in business planning.
a)

Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Calculation of coordinates for each constraint and objective function:
Constraint 1:
Constraint 2:
Objective function:
The problem is solved with iso-profit line method.
Graph:
(1) Optimal value of the decision variables and Z:
The coordinates for the profit line is (6, 8). The profit line is moved away from the origin. The highest point at which the profit line intersects in the feasible region will be the optimum solution. The following equation are solved as simultaneous equation to find optimum solution.
Solving (1)and (2)we get,
The values are substituted in the objective function to find the objective function value.
Optimal solution:
(2)
None of the constraints are having slack. Both the ≤ constraints are binding.
(3)
There are no ≥ constraints. Hence, none of the constraints have surplus.
(4)
There are no redundant constraints.
b)
To solve: The linear programming problem and answer the questions.
Introduction:
Linear programming:
Linear programming is a mathematical modelling method where a linear function is maximized or minimized taking into consideration the various constraints present in the problem. It is useful in making quantitative decisions in business planning.
b)

Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Calculation of coordinates for each constraint and objective function:
Constraint 1:
Constraint 2:
Constraint 3:
Objective function:
The problem is solved with iso-profit line method.
Graph:
(1) Optimal value of the decision variables and Z:
The coordinates for the profit line is (10, 2). The profit line is moved away from the origin. The highest point at which the profit line intersects in the feasible region will be the optimum solution. The following equations are solved as simultaneous equation to find optimum solution.
Solving (1)and (2)we get,
The values are substituted in the objective function to find the objective function value.
Optimal solution:
(2)
None of the constraints are having slack. The time constraint has ≤ and it is binding.
(3)
Durability and strength constraints have ≥ in them. The durability constraint is binding and has no surplus. The strength constraint has surplus as shown below:
The surplus is 15 (39 -24).
(4)
There are no redundant constraints.
c)
To solve: The linear programming problem and answer the questions.
Introduction:
Linear programming:
Linear programming is a mathematical modelling method where a linear function is maximized or minimized taking into consideration the various constraints present in the problem. It is useful in making quantitative decisions in business planning.
c)

Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Calculation of coordinates for each constraint and objective function:
Constraint 1:
Constraint 2:
Constraint 3:
Objective function:
The problem is solved with iso-profit line method.
Graph:
(1) Optimal value of the decision variables and Z:
The coordinates for the profit line is (20, 40). The profit line is moved away from the origin. The highest point at which the profit line intersects in the feasible region will be the optimum solution. The following equation are solved as simultaneous equation to find optimum solution.
Solving (1) and (2) we get,
The values are substituted in the objective function to find the objective function value.
Optimal solution:
(2)
The material and machinery constraint has ≤ and it is binding and has zero slack. The labor constraint has slack as shown below:
The slack is 120 (1,200 – 1,080).
(3)
There are no constraints with ≥. Hence, no constraints have surplus.
(4)
There are no redundant constraints
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 19 Solutions
Operations Management
- Provide a Synposis of the Articlearrow_forwardThe goal of understanding personality in negotiation is to better predict behavior, such as the counterparty's acceptance or rejection of a negotiation offer. One investigation used acoustic and visual cues to predict the likely behavior of a counterparty to a proposal. The best visual cue predictor of the counterparty (55%) was whether they _____. A. tilted their head B. had their arms and legs crossed C. steepled their fingers D. tapped a penarrow_forwardWomen who ask for what they want in negotiation are less well-liked than women who do not self-advocate. However, nonassertive, other-advocating women suffer a leadership backlash and are regarded as less competent because their behavior is regarded to be _____ and _____. A. high-negative feminine; low-positive masculine B. high-positive feminine; high-positive masculine C. high-negative masculine; low-negative feminine D. low-positive masculine; low-positive femininearrow_forward
- There are five most recognized personality traits that can reliably be measured and predict negotiator behavior in a number of different situations. All of the following are one of those "Big 5" personality traits except _____. A. conscientiousness B. introversion C. agreeableness D. openness to experiencearrow_forwardWith regard to reputation in negotiation, negotiators who use adversarial, stubborn, and ethically questionable behavior often have the effect of _____. A. improving their business relationships B. decreasing their effectiveness as a negotiator C. improving their business relationships D. decreasing their group statusarrow_forwardWhen it comes to assertiveness, there is only a modest link between negotiators' self-views and how the counterparty sees them. Many negotiators come away from a negotiation thinking they came on too strong with the counterparty. The _____ refers to the fact that negotiators believe they are coming on too strong with the counterparty, but they actually are not. A. Collective trap illusion B. Attribution error C. Aggressive anchoring bias D. Line-crossing illusionarrow_forward
- As you think about the issue of using chatbots in contract negotiations, consider whether other facets and concepts of negotiations that we have discussed and whether they would be adequately addressed.arrow_forwardWhile I am not a fan of AI as of yet, I do understand the endless possibilities. Based on the research, it is clear that AI has great potential for negotiation (Yang, 2025). Herold et al. (2025) suggested that AI can flag potential risks and liabilities, allowing negotiators to address them and mitigate potential problems proactively. AI can draft new contract templates by examining industry standards and past contracts, and AI technology can help lawyers spot errors and inconsistencies in contract drafts. In relation to risk management, AI can flag possible risks and liabilities, allowing negotiators to proactively address them and lessen potential problems, which can speed up the negotiation process, making the negotiation efficient because AI can industrialize tasks like document review, redlining, and finding potential issues, significantly reducing negotiation time. Lastly, AI can analyze vast amounts of data and identify errors, inconsistencies, and irregularities in…arrow_forwardWhat is a main thought on using AI in contract negotiations?arrow_forward
- What are some people thoughts on using AI in contract negotiations?arrow_forward3. Develop a high-level or summary: a. Risk Management Plan Focus on specific, actionable steps for each risk and mitigation strategy.Provide detailed timelines for procurement, stakeholder engagement, and risk monitoring.Avoid over-simplifying and add more technical details in areas like quality assurance and financial control measures. Add a risk prioritization method and mention how risks will be monitored and reviewed throughout the project lifecycle. Overall, it is well organized andc overs key risks.arrow_forward3. Develop a high-level or summary: Human Resource Management Plan Provide more concrete timelines and actionable steps for human resource management.Include more detailed risk management strategies and link them more explicitly to the overall project plan.Expand on how training and development will be evaluated and tracked.Also, the overall length is good, but some sections could be condensed by eliminating repetition (e.g., you discuss stakeholder communication and engagement in two sections without adding new information).Try not to repeat the same risk management ideas (e.g., resource sharing and stakeholder concerns) in multiple sections without adding value.arrow_forward
- Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,
