Concept explainers
How much copper metal can be produced by
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Interpretation:
The number of moles of copper metal deposited during the electrolysis of copper ion solution is to be determined.
Concept introduction:
The relation between the current, time taken and the charge is as follows:
Here,
is second, the S. I. unit of time, and C is coulomb, the S. I. unit of charge.
The relationship between the number of moles of electrons and the number of moles of metal is as follows:
Answer to Problem 1KSP
Solution: Option (b).
Explanation of Solution
The reduction half-reaction for copper metal is as follows:
Therefore, two moles of electrons are needed to reduce one mole of copper metal.
The number of moles of copper metal deposited after electrolysis when 1.85 A of current is passed for four hours, is determined as follows:
The number of moles of electrons required to reduce copper metal is calculated as follows:
Now, the number of moles of copper metal reduced is calculated as follows:
Hence, option (b) is correct.
Reason for incorrect options:
Option (a) is incorrect because on solving with the help of the above equation, the answers do not match with option (a).
Option (c) is incorrect because on solving with the help of the above equation, the answers do not match with option (c).
Option (d) is incorrect because on solving with the help of the above equation, the answers do not match with option (d).
Option (e) is incorrect because on solving with the help of the above equation, the answers do not match with option (e).
Hence, options (a), (c), (d), and (e) are incorrect.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 19 Solutions
BURDGE CHEMISTRY VALUE ED (LL)
- The emission data in cps displayed in Table 1 is reported to two decimal places by the chemist. However, the instrument output is shown in Table 2. Table 2. Iron emission from ICP-AES Sample Blank Standard Emission, cps 579.503252562 9308340.13122 Unknown Sample 343.232365741 Did the chemist make the correct choice in how they choose to display the data up in Table 1? Choose the best explanation from the choices below. No. Since the instrument calculates 12 digits for all values, they should all be kept and not truncated. Doing so would eliminate significant information. No. Since the instrument calculates 5 decimal places for the standard, all of the values should be limited to the same number. The other decimal places are not significant for the blank and unknown sample. Yes. The way Saman made the standards was limited by the 250-mL volumetric flask. This glassware can report values to 2 decimal places, and this establishes our number of significant figures. Yes. Instrumental data…arrow_forwardSteps and explanation pleasearrow_forwardSteps and explanation to undertand concepts.arrow_forward
- Nonearrow_forward7. Draw a curved arrow mechanism for the following reaction. HO cat. HCI OH in dioxane with 4A molecular sievesarrow_forwardTry: Convert the given 3D perspective structure to Newman projection about C2 - C3 bond (C2 carbon in the front). Also, show Newman projection of other possible staggered conformers and circle the most stable conformation. Use the template shown. F H3C Br Harrow_forward
- Nonearrow_forward16. Consider the probability distribution p(x) = ax", 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 for a positive integer n. A. Derive an expression for the constant a, to normalize p(x). B. Compute the average (x) as a function of n. C. Compute σ2 = (x²) - (x)², the variance of x, as a function of n.arrow_forward451. Use the diffusion model from lecture that showed the likelihood of mixing occurring in a lattice model with eight lattice sites: Case Left Right A B C Permeable Barrier → and show that with 2V lattice sites on each side of the permeable barrier and a total of 2V white particles and 2V black particles, that perfect de-mixing (all one color on each side of the barrier) becomes increasingly unlikely as V increases.arrow_forward
- Chemistry & Chemical ReactivityChemistryISBN:9781133949640Author:John C. Kotz, Paul M. Treichel, John Townsend, David TreichelPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Modern ChemistryChemistryISBN:9781305079113Author:David W. Oxtoby, H. Pat Gillis, Laurie J. ButlerPublisher:Cengage LearningGeneral Chemistry - Standalone book (MindTap Cour...ChemistryISBN:9781305580343Author:Steven D. Gammon, Ebbing, Darrell Ebbing, Steven D., Darrell; Gammon, Darrell Ebbing; Steven D. Gammon, Darrell D.; Gammon, Ebbing; Steven D. Gammon; DarrellPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Chemistry: Principles and ReactionsChemistryISBN:9781305079373Author:William L. Masterton, Cecile N. HurleyPublisher:Cengage LearningChemistry by OpenStax (2015-05-04)ChemistryISBN:9781938168390Author:Klaus Theopold, Richard H Langley, Paul Flowers, William R. Robinson, Mark BlaserPublisher:OpenStax
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781133949640/9781133949640_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305079113/9781305079113_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305580343/9781305580343_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305079373/9781305079373_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781938168390/9781938168390_smallCoverImage.gif)