MYLAB ECONOMICS WITH PEARSON ETEXT -- A
MYLAB ECONOMICS WITH PEARSON ETEXT -- A
5th Edition
ISBN: 2819260099840
Author: Mishkin
Publisher: PEARSON
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 19, Problem 1DAP
To determine

The results obtained from FRED database of the following:

  1. Number of quarterly violations of price stability and employment mandate from 2000 to 2017.
  2. Violation of price stability and employment mandate in 2017.
  3. Challenges faced by monetary policy makers in achieving natural rate of unemployment and inflation below 2%.

Expert Solution & Answer
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Based on the ad hoc test and data collected from FRED;

  1. Fed’s mandate states that the average inflation gap i.e. the price stability for any two or more consecutive quarters should not be more than 0.5 in absolute value and the unemployment gap should not be larger than 1.0 for two or more consecutive quarters. Any rate larger than that was mandated by Fed should be treated as violated. In last quarter of October 2008 and first quarter of January 2009, the unemployment rate was more than 1.0. Similarly, price stability was higher than 0.5 - four times during the period 2000 to 2017 in the year 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005.
  2. Currently, the Fed has not violated its mandate in price stability and unemployment gap.
  3. To assess the maximum-employment level that can be sustained, the Fed considers a broad range of labor market indicators, including how many workers are unemployed, underemployed, or discouraged and have stopped looking for a job. The Fed also looks at how hard or easy it is for people to find jobs and for employers to find qualified workers. The Fed does not specify a fixed goal for employment because the maximum level of employment is largely determined by non-monetary factors that affect the structure and dynamics of the labor market; these factors may change over time and may not be directly measurable. However, Fed policymakers release their estimates of the unemployment rate that they expect will prevail once the economy has recovered from past shocks and if it is not hit by new shocks. Another monetary policy tool deployed in response to the financial crisis was large-scale asset purchases. The Fed put additional downward pressure on longer-term interest rates. Moreover, as the Fed purchased these securities, private investors looked for other investment opportunities, and, in doing so, they pushed down other long-term interest rates, such as those on corporate bonds, and pushed up asset valuations, including equity prices. These market reactions to the large-scale asset purchases helped ease overall financial market conditions and thus supported growth in economic activity, job creation, and a return of inflation towards 2 percent.
Frequency: Quarterly
Observation_datePCECTPIGAPAVERAGE GAPUNRATEGAP
2000-01-012.50.60.84.00.0
2000-04-012.4-0.13.9-0.1
2000-07-012.52.64.0-0.1
2000-10-012.50.03.9-0.1
2001-01-012.3-0.20.34.20.3
2001-04-012.32.54.40.4
2001-07-011.8-0.64.80.4
2001-10-011.3-0.55.50.7
2002-01-010.81.30.95.70.1
2002-04-011.10.3 5.80.1
2002-07-011.50.4 5.7-0.1
2002-10-011.91.5 5.90.0
2003-01-012.50.50.65.90.0
2003-04-011.8-0.7 6.10.3
2003-07-011.92.6 6.1-0.3
2003-10-011.8-0.1 5.8-0.3
2004-01-011.90.10.75.7-0.1
2004-04-012.52.4 5.6-0.2
2004-07-012.50.0 5.4-0.2
2004-10-012.90.4 5.40.0
2005-01-012.62.21.35.3-0.2
2005-04-012.60.0 5.1-0.2
2005-07-013.10.5 5.0-0.1
2005-10-013.12.6 5.0-0.2
2006-01-013.0-0.10.44.7-0.2
2006-04-013.10.14.6-0.1
2006-07-012.82.64.6-0.2
2006-10-011.8-1.04.4-0.2
2007-01-012.30.50.84.50.1
2007-04-012.31.84.50.2
2007-07-012.1-0.24.70.2
2007-10-013.31.24.80.1
2008-01-013.32.10.95.00.3
2008-04-013.50.35.30.3
2008-07-014.00.56.00.7
2008-10-011.51.06.91.4
2009-01-010.0-1.4-0.18.31.4
2009-04-01-0.5-0.69.31.0
2009-07-01-0.9-0.39.60.3
2009-10-011.22.19.90.3
2010-01-012.10.90.39.8-0.1
2010-04-011.80.99.6-0.2
2010-07-011.4-0.39.5-0.2
2010-10-011.3-0.29.50.0
2011-01-011.71.81.49.00.0
2011-04-012.60.99.10.0
2011-07-012.90.29.0-0.1
2011-10-012.72.48.6-0.4
2012-01-012.5-0.20.48.3-0.4
2012-04-011.8-0.78.2-0.1
2012-07-011.62.38.0-0.2
2012-10-011.80.27.8-0.2
2013-01-011.5-0.20.37.7-0.1
2013-04-011.31.57.5-0.3
2013-07-011.30.07.2-0.3
2013-10-011.2-0.16.9-0.3
2014-01-011.41.50.86.7-0.4
2014-04-011.80.46.2-0.4
2014-07-011.7-0.16.1-0.1
2014-10-011.21.35.7-0.1
2015-01-010.3-0.9-0.15.6-0.1
2015-04-010.30.05.4-0.2
2015-07-010.30.35.1-0.1
2015-10-010.40.15.0-0.1
2016-01-011.00.60.44.9-0.1
2016-04-011.00.54.90.1
2016-07-011.20.14.90.1
2016-10-011.60.54.7-0.2
2017-01-012.01.60.74.7-0.3
2017-04-011.6-0.54.3-0.3
2017-07-011.5-0.14.30.0
2017-10-011.71.74.10.0
2018-01-011.80.14.10.0
Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

The Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED), is an online database consisting of hundreds of thousands of economic data time series from scores of national, international, public and private sources.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
2. Question The 'Democratic Family' consists of three members {mother m, father f, daughter d}, that have different preferences with respect to how much money X € [0,8] they think should be invested in the new family car. These preferences can be represented by the following utility functions: - Mother m: um(X) = 2X - X² Father f: uf(X) = 10X - X² - Daughter d: ud(X) = 4X - X² Calculate for each family member (f, m, d) the preferred amount of money to invest in the new car denoted by X; for i = {m, f,d}. Assume that (Xf, Xm, Xd) are the three alternatives on which the family must decide. Show that each family member has rational preferences over this domain. Preferences on the family level are determined by pairwise majority voting (all family members vote on two alternatives). Derive the family preference and check whether it is rational. Assume that the final family decision is made by conducting sequential pair- wise majority voting, where the loosing alternative is eliminated. Does…
3. Question You invented a new lateral-flow test for asymptomatic Covid-19 detection, where saliva is entered into a test-tube and then the result is shown directly on the device. However, to save on costly chemicals you designed the tests such that it always reports a negative test result. Assume that the incidence rate is 5 per 1000 and that your test is used for detection of asymptomatic cases (without symptoms). (a) Calculate the probability that 100 randomly determined volunteers receive a correct test result by using the AND-rule and the OR-rule. Can your test be qualified as a diagnostic test? (b) The health authorities are investigating the performance of your test. Government guidelines require a specificity (conditional probability to re- ceive a negative test result given that the test-taker is not infected with COVID19) of at least 97% and a sensitivity (conditional probability to receive a positive test result given that the test-taker is infected with COVID-19) of at…
3. Question You invented a new lateral-flow test for asymptomatic Covid-19 detection, where saliva is entered into a test-tube and then the result is shown directly on the device. However, to save on costly chemicals you designed the tests such that it always reports a negative test result. Assume that the incidence rate is 5 per 1000 and that your test is used for detection of asymptomatic cases (without symptoms). (a) Calculate the probability that 100 randomly determined volunteers receive a correct test result by using the AND-rule and the OR-rule. Can your test be qualified as a diagnostic test? (b) The health authorities are investigating the performance of your test. Government guidelines require a specificity (conditional probability to re- ceive a negative test result given that the test-taker is not infected with COVID19) of at least 97% and a sensitivity (conditional probability to receive a positive test result given that the test-taker is infected with COVID-19) of at…
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:Oxford University Press
Text book image
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education