data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12cff/12cff50e1574695e2175646766cd09089af52a37" alt="Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap Course List)"
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap Course List)
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781305504912
Author: Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Textbook Question
Chapter 18, Problem 3P
- In problem 9 in Chapter 17, we described a study demonstrating that the colored is often associated with male dominance. Hill and Barton (2005) monitored the outcome of four combat sports, (boxing Tae Kwon Do, Greco-Roman wrestling, and freestyle wrestling) during the 2004 Olympic Games and found that participants wearing red outfits won significantly more often than those wearing blue.
- If athletes wearing red won 31 out of 50 matches is that sufficient to be significantly more than would be expected by chance? Use a two-tai led test with a = .05.
- If 62 out of 100 wearing red won, is that enough to be significant using a two-tailed test with a =.05.
- Note that the percentage of winning for red uniforms in part is identical to the percentage in part b (31/50= 62/100 = 62%) however, one is significant and the other is not. Explain why the two sample lead to different conclusions.
- The color red is often associated with anger and male dominance. Based on this observation, Hil1 and Barton (2005) monitored the outcome of four combat sports (boxing, tae kwan do, Greco-Roman wrestling, and freestyle wrestling, during the 2004 Olympic games and found that participants wearing red outfits won significantly more often than those wearing blue.
- In 50 wrestling matches involving red versus blue suppose that the red outfit won 31 times and lost 19 times. Is this sufficient to conclude that red wins significantly more than would be expected by chance? Test at the .05 level of significance. b. In 100 matches, suppose red won 62 times and lost 38. Is this sufficient to conclude that red wins sig nificantly more than would be expected by chance? Again, use a = .05.
c. Note that the winning percentage for red uniforms in part a is identical to the percentage in part b (31/50=62/100=62%). Although the two samples have an identical winning percentage, one is significant and the other is not. Explain why the two samples lead to different conclusions.
Expert Solution & Answer
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2698b/2698b129880c27e76a91019c9f73226195062b2d" alt="Check Mark"
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutiondata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcc24/dcc24561111272e79a148ae4d6ab4a805bb28b11" alt="Blurred answer"
Students have asked these similar questions
Three players (one divider and two choosers) are going to divide a cake fairly using the lone divider method. The divider cuts the cake into three slices (s1, s2, and s3).
If the choosers' declarations are Chooser 1: {s1 , s2} and Chooser 2: {s2 , s3}.
Using the lone-divider method, how many different fair divisions of this cake are possible?
Theorem 2.6 (The Minkowski inequality)
Let p≥1. Suppose that X and Y are random variables, such that E|X|P <∞ and
E|Y P <00. Then
X+YpX+Yp
Theorem 1.2 (1) Suppose that P(|X|≤b) = 1 for some b > 0, that EX = 0, and
set Var X = 0². Then, for 0 0,
P(X > x) ≤e-x+1²²
P(|X|>x) ≤2e-1x+1²²
(ii) Let X1, X2...., Xn be independent random variables with mean 0, suppose
that P(X ≤b) = 1 for all k, and set oσ = Var X. Then, for
x > 0.
and
0x) ≤2 exp
Σ
k=1
(iii) If, in addition, X1, X2, X, are identically distributed, then
P(S|x) ≤2 expl-tx+nt²o).
Chapter 18 Solutions
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap Course List)
Ch. 18 - 1. Insurance companies charge young drivers more...Ch. 18 - 2. Güven, Elaimis, Binokay, and Tan (2003) studied...Ch. 18 - In problem 9 in Chapter 17, we described a study...Ch. 18 - 4. Problems 5 and 6 in Chapter 17 cited a study...Ch. 18 - 5. A researcher would like to determine whether...Ch. 18 - 6. A recent survey of practicing psychotherapists...Ch. 18 - 7. In 2005, Fung et al. published a study...Ch. 18 - 8. In problem 13 in Chapter 9, wepresented a study...Ch. 18 - Prob. 9PCh. 18 - Prob. 10P
Ch. 18 - Prob. 11PCh. 18 - 12. One of the original methods for testing ESP...Ch. 18 - Prob. 13PCh. 18 - Prob. 14PCh. 18 - 15. In Example 11.2 (p. 343) we presented a...Ch. 18 - Stressful or traumatic experiences can often...Ch. 18 - Prob. 17PCh. 18 - Prob. 18PCh. 18 - Prob. 19PCh. 18 - In Problem 14 in Chapter 11, we described a study...Ch. 18 - In problem 13 in Chapter 17, we Discussed a study...Ch. 18 - Prob. 22PCh. 18 - Prob. 23PCh. 18 - Prob. 24PCh. 18 - Prob. 25P
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Theorem 5.1 (Jensen's inequality) state without proof the Jensen's Ineg. Let X be a random variable, g a convex function, and suppose that X and g(X) are integrable. Then g(EX) < Eg(X).arrow_forwardCan social media mistakes hurt your chances of finding a job? According to a survey of 1,000 hiring managers across many different industries, 76% claim that they use social media sites to research prospective candidates for any job. Calculate the probabilities of the following events. (Round your answers to three decimal places.) answer parts a-c. a) Out of 30 job listings, at least 19 will conduct social media screening. b) Out of 30 job listings, fewer than 17 will conduct social media screening. c) Out of 30 job listings, exactly between 19 and 22 (including 19 and 22) will conduct social media screening. show all steps for probabilities please. answer parts a-c.arrow_forwardQuestion: we know that for rt. (x+ys s ا. 13. rs. and my so using this, show that it vye and EIXI, EIYO This : E (IX + Y) ≤2" (EIX (" + Ely!")arrow_forward
- Theorem 2.4 (The Hölder inequality) Let p+q=1. If E|X|P < ∞ and E|Y| < ∞, then . |EXY ≤ E|XY|||X|| ||||qarrow_forwardTheorem 7.6 (Etemadi's inequality) Let X1, X2, X, be independent random variables. Then, for all x > 0, P(max |S|>3x) ≤3 max P(S| > x). Isk≤narrow_forwardTheorem 7.2 Suppose that E X = 0 for all k, that Var X = 0} x) ≤ 2P(S>x 1≤k≤n S√2), -S√2). P(max Sk>x) ≤ 2P(|S|>x- 1arrow_forwardThree players (one divider and two choosers) are going to divide a cake fairly using the lone divider method. The divider cuts the cake into three slices (s1, s2, and s3).If the chooser's declarations are Chooser 1: {s3} and Chooser 2: {s3}, which of the following is a fair division of the cake?arrow_forwardTheorem 1.4 (Chebyshev's inequality) (i) Suppose that Var X x)≤- x > 0. 2 (ii) If X1, X2,..., X, are independent with mean 0 and finite variances, then Στη Var Xe P(|Sn| > x)≤ x > 0. (iii) If, in addition, X1, X2, Xn are identically distributed, then nVar Xi P(|Sn> x) ≤ x > 0. x²arrow_forwardTheorem 2.5 (The Lyapounov inequality) For 0arrow_forwardTheorem 1.6 (The Kolmogorov inequality) Let X1, X2, Xn be independent random variables with mean 0 and suppose that Var Xk 0, P(max Sk>x) ≤ Isk≤n Σ-Var X In particular, if X1, X2,..., X, are identically distributed, then P(max Sx) ≤ Isk≤n nVar X₁ x2arrow_forwardTheorem 3.1 (The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality) Suppose that X and Y have finite variances. Then |EXYarrow_forwardAbout 25% of people in America use a certain social media website. In a group with 20 people (assume that it is a random sample of people in America), what are the following probabilities? (Round your answers to three decimal places.) a) At least one of them uses the website. b) More than two of them use the website. c) None of them use the website. d) At least 18 of them do not use the website. please show all steps and work for probabilities. answer parts a-d.arrow_forwardarrow_back_iosSEE MORE QUESTIONSarrow_forward_iosRecommended textbooks for you
- Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic GeometryAlgebraISBN:9781133382119Author:SwokowskiPublisher:CengageCollege Algebra (MindTap Course List)AlgebraISBN:9781305652231Author:R. David Gustafson, Jeff HughesPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw HillHolt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition...AlgebraISBN:9780547587776Author:HOLT MCDOUGALPublisher:HOLT MCDOUGAL
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic GeometryAlgebraISBN:9781133382119Author:SwokowskiPublisher:CengageCollege Algebra (MindTap Course List)AlgebraISBN:9781305652231Author:R. David Gustafson, Jeff HughesPublisher:Cengage LearningGlencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw HillHolt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition...AlgebraISBN:9780547587776Author:HOLT MCDOUGALPublisher:HOLT MCDOUGALBayes' Theorem 1: Introduction and conditional probability; Author: Dr Nic's Maths and Stats;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQVkXfJ-rpU;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BYWhat is Conditional Probability | Bayes Theorem | Conditional Probability Examples & Problems; Author: ACADGILD;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxOny_1y2Q4;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BYBayes' Theorem of Probability With Tree Diagrams & Venn Diagrams; Author: The Organic Chemistry Tutor;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OByl4RJxnKA;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BYBayes' Theorem - The Simplest Case; Author: Dr. Trefor Bazett;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQoLVl31ZfQ;License: Standard Youtube License