REVEL for Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis -- Access Card (16th Edition) (What's New in Accounting)
16th Edition
ISBN: 9780134789705
Author: Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. Rajan
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Videos
Textbook Question
Chapter 18, Problem 18.39P
Physical units, inspection at various levels of completion, weighted-average
At the start of November 2017, SunEnergy’s assembly department had 2,400 panels in beginning work in process, which were 100% complete for materials and 40% complete for conversion costs. An additional 12,000 units were started in the department in November, and 3,600 units remain in work in process at the end of the month. These unfinished units are 100% complete for materials and 70% complete for conversion costs.
The assembly department had 1,800 spoiled units in November. Because of the difficulty of keeping moisture out of the modules and sealing the photovoltaic cells between layers of glass, normal spoilage is approximately 12% of good units. The department’s costs for the month of November are as follows:
| Beginning WIP | Costs Incurred During Period | |
| Direct materials costs | $ 76,800 | $ 240,000 |
| Conversion costs | 123,000 | 1,200,000 |
- 1. Using the format on page 728, compute the normal and abnormal spoilage in units for November, assuming the inspection point is at (a) the 30% stage of completion, (b) the 60% stage of completion, and (c) the 100% stage of completion.
Required
- 2. Refer to your answer in requirement 1. Why are there different amounts of normal and abnormal spoilage at different inspection points?
- 3. Now assume that the assembly department inspects at the 60% stage of completion. Using the weighted-average method, calculate the cost of units transferred out, the cost of abnormal spoilage, and the cost of ending inventory for the assembly department in November.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Arona Corporation manufactures canoes in two departments, Fabrication and Waterproofing. In the Fabrication Department, fiberglass panels are
attached to a canoe- shaped aluminum frame. The canoes are then transferred to the Waterproofing department to be coated with sealant. Arona uses a
weighted-average process cost system to collect costs in both departments.
All materials in the Fabrication Department are added at the beginning of the production process. On July 1, the Fabrication Department had 30 canoes
in process that were 20% complete with respect to conversion cost. On July 31, Fabrication had 20 canoes in process that were 40% complete with
respect to conversion cost. During July, the Fabrication Department completed 87 canoes and transferred them to the Waterproofing Department.
What are the Fabrication Department's equivalent units of production related to conversion costs for July?
Multiple Choice
95
117
79
107
The Converting Department of Toren Company had 1,080 units in work in process at the beginning of the period, which were 30% complete. During the period, 22,800
units were completed and transferred to the Packing Department. There were 1,200 units in process at the end of the period, which were 30% complete. Direct materials
are placed into the process at the beginning of production.
This information has been collected in the Microsoft Excel Online file. Open the spreadsheet, perform the required analysis, and input your answers in the questions below.
X
Open spreadsheet
roduction
Determine the number of equivalent units of production with respect to direct materials and conversion costs. If an amount is zero, enter in "0".
Toren Company
Number of Equivalent Units of Production
Inventory in process, beginning
Started and completed
Transferred to Packing Department
Inventory in process, ending
Total
Direct Materials Conversion
Whole Units Equivalent Units Equivalent Units
Blossom Company manufactures basketballs. The first step is the production of internal rubber bladders. Materials are added at the
beginning of the production process, and conversion costs are incurred uniformly. Production and cost data for the Bladder
Department for July 2025 are as follows.
Production Data-Basketballs.
Work in process units, July 1
Units started into production
Work in process units, July 31
Cost Data-Basketballs
Work in process, July 1
Materials
Conversion costs
Costs added during July
Direct materials
Direct labor
Manufacturing overhead
(a1)
$700
Equivalent Units
550
Units
Materials
400
1,000
500
$1,250
1,960
1,200
1,000
Percent
Complete
60 %
Calculate the equivalent units of production for materials and conversion costs.
40 %
Conversion Costs
Chapter 18 Solutions
REVEL for Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis -- Access Card (16th Edition) (What's New in Accounting)
Ch. 18 - Why is there an unmistakable trend in...Ch. 18 - Distinguish among spoilage, rework, and scrap.Ch. 18 - Normal spoilage is planned spoilage. Discuss.Ch. 18 - Costs of abnormal spoilage are losses. Explain.Ch. 18 - What has been regarded as normal spoilage in the...Ch. 18 - Units of abnormal spoilage are inferred rather...Ch. 18 - In accounting for spoiled units, we are dealing...Ch. 18 - Total input includes abnormal as well as normal...Ch. 18 - Prob. 18.9QCh. 18 - The unit cost of normal spoilage is the same as...
Ch. 18 - In job costing, the costs of normal spoilage that...Ch. 18 - The costs of rework are always charged to the...Ch. 18 - Abnormal rework costs should be charged to a loss...Ch. 18 - When is a company justified in inventorying scrap?Ch. 18 - How do managers use information about scrap?Ch. 18 - Prob. 18.16MCQCh. 18 - Which of the following is a TRUE statement...Ch. 18 - Healthy Dinners Co. produces frozen dinners for...Ch. 18 - Fresh Products, Inc. incurred the following costs...Ch. 18 - Normal and abnormal spoilage in units. The...Ch. 18 - Weighted-average method, spoilage, equivalent...Ch. 18 - Weighted-average method, assigning costs...Ch. 18 - FIFO method, spoilage, equivalent units. Refer to...Ch. 18 - FIFO method, assigning costs (continuation of...Ch. 18 - Weighted-average method, spoilage. LaCroix Company...Ch. 18 - FIFO method, spoilage. 1. Do Exercise 18-25 using...Ch. 18 - Spoilage, journal entries. Plastique produces...Ch. 18 - Recognition of loss from spoilage. Spheres Toys...Ch. 18 - Weighted-average method, spoilage. LogicCo is a...Ch. 18 - FIFO method, spoilage. Refer to the information in...Ch. 18 - Standard-costing method, spoilage. Refer to the...Ch. 18 - Spoilage and job costing. (L. Bamber) Barrett...Ch. 18 - Reworked units, costs of rework. Heyer Appliances...Ch. 18 - Scrap, job costing. The Russell Company has an...Ch. 18 - Weighted-average method, spoilage. World Class...Ch. 18 - FIFO method, spoilage. Refer to the information in...Ch. 18 - Weighted-average method, shipping department...Ch. 18 - FIFO method, shipping department (continuation of...Ch. 18 - Physical units, inspection at various levels of...Ch. 18 - Spoilage in job costing. Jellyfish Machine Shop is...Ch. 18 - Rework in job costing, journal entry (continuation...Ch. 18 - Scrap at time of sale or at time of production,...Ch. 18 - Physical units, inspection at various stages of...Ch. 18 - Weighted-average method, inspection at 80%...Ch. 18 - Job costing, classifying spoilage, ethics....
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Berrian Company manufactures car seats in its Tulsa plant. Each car seat passes through the assembly department and the testing department. This problem focuses on the assembly department. Data for the assembly department for October 2017 are as follows: Read the requirements3. Requirement 1. For each cost category, compute equivalent units in the assembly department. Show physical units in the first column of your schedule. Equivalent Units Physical Direct Conversion Flow of Production Units Materials Costs Work in process beginning Started during current period To account for Completed and transferred out during current period Work in process, ending Accounted for Work done to date Requirement 2. What issues should the manager focus on when reviewing the equivalent-unit calculations? To show better…arrow_forwardAt the High Quality GAYUMA Corp., operated by A.E. Cabug, the process begins with the blending of various chemicals and ends with the bottling of GAYUMA product after which the bottles are sent to the shipping department for packing and crating. Labor and overhead are continuously added during the processing. Overhead is applied at the rate of P30 per direct labor hour. Data for May follows: Work in process, beginning 4, 000 units Raw materials-chemicals (60% complete) Direct Labor (25% complete) Overhead (25% complete) Started in Process 21, 000 units Completed and transferred 20, 000 units Work in process, end Raw materials-chemicals (100% complete) Raw materials-bottles (60% complete) Direct labor (80% complete) Overhead (80% complete) Costs for May: Work in process,…arrow_forwardAt the High Quality GAYUMA Corp., operated by A.E. Cabug, the process begins with the blending of various chemicals and ends with the bottling of GAYUMA product after which the bottles are sent to the shipping department for packing and crating. Labor and overhead are continuously added during the processing. Overhead is applied at the rate of P30 per direct labor hour. Data for May follows: Work in process, beginning 4, 000 units Raw materials-chemicals (60% complete) Direct Labor (25% complete) Overhead (25% complete) Started in Process 21, 000 units Completed and transferred 20, 000 units Work in process, end Raw materials-chemicals (100% complete) Raw materials-bottles (60% complete) Direct labor (80% complete) Overhead (80% complete) Costs for May: Work in process, beginning Raw materials-chemicals P456, 000 Direct labor (P100 per hour) 62, 500 Overhead 18, 750 Current costs added Raw materials-chemicals P2, 284, 000 Raw materials-bottles 70, 000 Direct labor (P100 per hour) 330,…arrow_forward
- I need all subparts please .arrow_forwardHealthway uses a process-costing system to compute the unit costs of the minerals that it produces. It has three departments: Mixing, Tableting, and Bottling. In Mixing, at the beginning of the process all materials are added and the ingredients for the minerals are measured, sifted, and blended together. The mix is transferred out in gallon containers. The Tableting Department takes the powdered mix and places it in capsules. One gallon of powdered mix converts to 1,600 capsules. After the capsules are filled and polished, they are transferred to Bottling where they are placed in bottles, which are then affixed with a safety seal and a lid and labeled. Each bottle receives 50 capsules. During July, the following results are available for the first two departments (direct materials are added at the beginning in both departments): Overhead in both departments is applied as a percentage of direct labor costs. In the Mixing Department, overhead is 200 percent of direct labor. In the Tableting Department, the overhead rate is 150 percent of direct labor. Required: 1. Prepare a production report for the Mixing Department using the weighted average method. Follow the five steps outlined in the chapter. Round unit cost to three decimal places. 2. Prepare a production report for the Tableting Department. Materials are added at the beginning of the process. Follow the five steps outlined in the chapter. Round unit cost to four decimal places.arrow_forwardGolding Manufacturing, a division of Farnsworth Sporting, Inc., produces two different models of bows and eight models of knives. The bow-manufacturing process involves the production of two major subassemblies: the limbs and the handle. The limbs pass through four sequential processes before reaching final assembly: lay-up, molding, fabricating, and finishing. In the Lay-Up Department, limbs are created by laminating layers of wood. In Molding, the limbs are heat treated, under pressure, to form a strong resilient limb. In the Fabricating Department, any protruding glue or other processing residue is removed. Finally, in Finishing, the limbs are cleaned with acetone, dried, and sprayed with the final finishes. The handles pass through two processes before reaching final assembly: pattern and finishing. In the Pattern Department, blocks of wood are fed into a machine that is set to shape the handles. Different patterns are possible, depending on the machines setting. After coming out of the machine, the handles are cleaned and smoothed. They then pass to the Finishing Department where they are sprayed with the final finishes. In Final Assembly, the limbs and handles are assembled into different models using purchased parts such as pulley assemblies, weight adjustment bolts, side plates, and string. Golding, since its inception, has been using process costing to assign product costs. A predetermined overhead rate is used based on direct labor dollars (80 percent of direct labor dollars). Recently, Golding has hired a new controller, Karen Jenkins. After reviewing the product costing procedures, Karen requested a meeting with the divisional manager, Aaron Suhr. The following is a transcript of their conversation: KAREN: Aaron, I have some concerns about our cost accounting system. We make two different models of bows and are treating them as if they were the same product. Now I know that the only real difference between the models is the handle. The processing of the handles is the same, but the handles differ significantly in the amount and quality of wood used. Our current costing does not reflect this difference in direct material input. AARON: Your predecessor is responsible. He believed that tracking the difference in direct material cost wasnt worth the effort. He simply didnt believe that it would make much difference in the unit cost of either model. KAREN: Well, he may have been right, but I have my doubts. If there is a significant difference, it could affect our views of which model is more important to the company. The additional bookkeeping isnt very stringent. All we have to worry about is the Pattern Department. The other departments fit what I view as a process-costing pattern. AARON: Why dont you look into it? If there is a significant difference, go ahead and adjust the costing system. After the meeting, Karen decided to collect cost data on the two models: the Deluxe model and the Econo model. She decided to track the costs for one week. At the end of the week, she had collected the following data from the Pattern Department: a. There were a total of 2,500 bows completed: 1,000 Deluxe models and 1,500 Econo models. b. There was no beginning work in process; however, there were 300 units in ending work in process: 200 Deluxe and 100 Econo models. Both models were 80 percent complete with respect to conversion costs and 100 percent complete with respect to direct materials. c. The Pattern Department experienced the following costs: d. On an experimental basis, the requisition forms for direct materials were modified to identify the dollar value of the direct materials used by the Econo and Deluxe models: Required: 1. Compute the unit cost for the handles produced by the Pattern Department, assuming that process costing is totally appropriate. 2. Compute the unit cost of each handle, using the separate cost information provided on materials. 3. Compare the unit costs computed in Requirements 1 and 2. Is Karen justified in her belief that a pure process-costing relationship is not appropriate? Describe the costing system that you would recommend. 4. In the past, the marketing manager has requested more money for advertising the Econo line. Aaron has repeatedly refused to grant any increase in this products advertising budget because its per-unit profit (selling price less manufacturing cost) is so low. Given the results in Requirements 1 through 3, was Aaron justified in his position?arrow_forward
- Golding Manufacturing, a division of Farnsworth Sporting Inc., produces two different models of bows and eight models of knives. The bow-manufacturing process involves the production of two major subassemblies: the limbs and the handles. The limbs pass through four sequential processes before reaching final assembly: layup, molding, fabricating, and finishing. In the layup department, limbs are created by laminating layers of wood. In the molding department, the limbs are heat-treated, under pressure, to form strong resilient limbs. In the fabricating department, any protruding glue or other processing residue is removed. Finally, in the finishing department, the limbs are cleaned with acetone, dried, and sprayed with the final finishes. The handles pass through two processes before reaching final assembly: pattern and finishing. In the pattern department, blocks of wood are fed into a machine that is set to shape the handles. Different patterns are possible, depending on the machines setting. After coming out of the machine, the handles are cleaned and smoothed. They then pass to the finishing department, where they are sprayed with the final finishes. In final assembly, the limbs and handles are assembled into different models using purchased parts such as pulley assemblies, weight-adjustment bolts, side plates, and string. Golding, since its inception, has been using process costing to assign product costs. A predetermined overhead rate is used based on direct labor dollars (80% of direct labor dollars). Recently, Golding has hired a new controller, Karen Jenkins. After reviewing the product-costing procedures, Karen requested a meeting with the divisional manager, Aaron Suhr. The following is a transcript of their conversation: Karen: Aaron, I have some concerns about our cost accounting system. We make two different models of bows and are treating them as if they were the same product. Now I know that the only real difference between the models is the handle. The processing of the handles is the same, but the handles differ significantly in the amount and quality of wood used. Our current costing does not reflect this difference in material input. Aaron: Your predecessor is responsible. He believed that tracking the difference in material cost wasnt worth the effort. He simply didnt believe that it would make much difference in the unit cost of either model. Karen: Well, he may have been right, but I have my doubts. If there is a significant difference, it could affect our views of which model is more important to the company. The additional bookkeeping isnt very stringent. All we have to worry about is the pattern department. The other departments fit what I view as a process-costing pattern. Aaron: Why dont you look into it? If there is a significant difference, go ahead and adjust the costing system. After the meeting, Karen decided to collect cost data on the two models: the Deluxe model and the Econo model. She decided to track the costs for one week. At the end of the week, she had collected the following data from the pattern department: a. There were a total of 2,500 bows completed: 1,000 Deluxe models and 1,500 Econo models. b. There was no BWIP; however, there were 300 units in EWIP: 200 Deluxe and 100 Econo models. Both models were 80% complete with respect to conversion costs and 100% complete with respect to materials. c. The pattern department experienced the following costs: d. On an experimental basis, the requisition forms for materials were modified to identify the dollar value of the materials used by the Econo and Deluxe models: Required: 1. Compute the unit cost for the handles produced by the pattern department, assuming that process costing is totally appropriate. Round unit cost to two decimal places. 2. Compute the unit cost of each handle, using the separate cost information provided on materials. Round unit cost to two decimal places. 3. Compare the unit costs computed in Requirements 1 and 2. Is Karen justified in her belief that a pure process-costing relationship is not appropriate? Describe the costing system that you would recommend. 4. In the past, the marketing manager has requested more money for advertising the Econo line. Aaron has repeatedly refused to grant any increase in this products advertising budget because its per-unit profit (selling price minus manufacturing cost) is so low. Given the results in Requirements 1 through 3, was Aaron justified in his position?arrow_forwardBienestar Inc., has the following departmental structure for producing a well-known multivitamin: A consultant designed the following cellular manufacturing structure for the same product: The times above the processes represent the time required to process one unit of product. Required: 1. Calculate the time required to produce a batch of 15 bottles using a batch-processing departmental structure. 2. Calculate the time to process 15 units using cellular manufacturing. 3. How much manufacturing time will the cellular manufacturing structure save for a batch of 15 units?arrow_forwardLacy, Inc., produces a subassembly used in the production of hydraulic cylinders. The subassemblies are produced in three departments: Plate Cutting, Rod Cutting, and Welding. Materials are added at the beginning of the process. Overhead is applied using the following drivers and activity rates: Other data for the Plate Cutting Department are as follows: Required: 1. Prepare a physical flow schedule. 2. Calculate equivalent units of production for: a. Direct materials b. Conversion costs 3. Calculate unit costs for: a. Direct materials b. Conversion costs c. Total manufacturing 4. Provide the following information: a. The total cost of units transferred out b. The journal entry for transferring costs from Plate Cutting to Welding c. The cost assigned to units in ending inventoryarrow_forward
- Heap Company manufactures a product that passes through two processes: Fabrication and Assembly. The following information was obtained for the Fabrication Department for September: a. All materials are added at the beginning of the process. b. Beginning work in process had 80,000 units, 30 percent complete with respect to conversion costs. c. Ending work in process had 17,000 units, 25 percent complete with respect to conversion costs. d. Started in process, 95,000 units. Required: 1. Prepare a physical flow schedule. 2. Compute equivalent units using the weighted average method. 3. Compute equivalent units using the FIFO method.arrow_forwardAKL Foundry manufactures metal components for different kinds of equipment used by the aerospace, commercial aircraft, medical equipment, and electronic industries. The company uses investment casting to produce the required components. Investment casting consists of creating, in wax, a replica of the final product and pouring a hard shell around it. After removing the wax, molten metal is poured into the resulting cavity. What remains after the shell is broken is the desired metal object ready to be put to its designated use. Metal components pass through eight processes: gating, shell creating, foundry work, cutoff, grinding, finishing, welding, and strengthening. Gating creates the wax mold and clusters the wax pattern around a sprue (a hole through which the molten metal will be poured through the gates into the mold in the foundry process), which is joined and supported by gates (flow channels) to form a tree of patterns. In the shell-creating process, the wax molds are alternately dipped in a ceramic slurry and a fluidized bed of progressively coarser refractory grain until a sufficiently thick shell (or mold) completely encases the wax pattern. After drying, the mold is sent to the foundry process. Here, the wax is melted out of the mold, and the shell is fired, strengthened, and brought to the proper temperature. Molten metal is then poured into the dewaxed shell. Finally, the ceramic shell is removed, and the finished product is sent to the cutoff process, where the parts are separated from the tree by the use of a band saw. The parts are then sent to the grinding process, where the gates that allowed the molten metal to flow into the ceramic cavities are ground off using large abrasive grinders. In the finishing process, rough edges caused by the grinders are removed by small handheld pneumatic tools. Parts that are flawed at this point are sent to welding for corrective treatment. The last process uses heat to treat the parts to bring them to the desired strength. In 20X1, the two partners who owned AKL Foundry decided to split up and divide the business. In dissolving their business relationship, they were faced with the problem of dividing the business assets equitably. Since the company had two plantsone in Arizona and one in New Mexicoa suggestion was made to split the business on the basis of geographic location. One partner would assume ownership of the plant in New Mexico, and the other would assume ownership of the plant in Arizona. However, this arrangement had one major complication: the amount of WIP inventory located in the Arizona plant. The Arizona facilities had been in operation for more than a decade and were full of WIP. The New Mexico facility had been operational for only 2 years and had much smaller WIP inventories. The partner located in New Mexico argued that to disregard the unequal value of the WIP inventories would be grossly unfair. Unfortunately, during the entire business history of AKL Foundry, WIP inventories had never been assigned any value. In computing the cost of goods sold each year, the company had followed the policy of adding depreciation to the out-of-pocket costs of direct labor, direct materials, and overhead. Accruals for the company are nearly nonexistent, and there are hardly ever any ending inventories of materials. During 20X1, the Arizona plant had sales of 2,028,670. The cost of goods sold is itemized as follows: Upon request, the owners of AKL provided the following supplementary information (percentages are cumulative): Gating had 10,000 units in BWIP, 60% complete. Assume that all materials are added at the beginning of each process. During the year, 50,000 units were completed and transferred out. The ending inventory had 11,000 unfinished units, 60% complete. Required: 1. The partners of AKL want a reasonable estimate of the cost of WIP inventories. Using the gating departments inventory as an example, prepare an estimate of the cost of the EWIP. What assumptions did you make? Did you use the FIFO or weighted average method? Why? (Note: Round unit cost to two decimal places.) 2. Assume that the shell-creating process has 8,000 units in BWIP, 20% complete. During the year, 50,000 units were completed and transferred out. (Note: All 50,000 units were sold; no other units were sold.) The EWIP inventory had 8,000 units, 30% complete. Compute the value of the shell-creating departments EWIP. What additional assumptions had to be made?arrow_forwardReducir, Inc., produces two different types of hydraulic cylinders. Reducir produces a major subassembly for the cylinders in the Cutting and Welding Department. Other parts and the subassembly are then assembled in the Assembly Department. The activities, expected costs, and drivers associated with these two manufacturing processes are given below. Note: In the assembly process, the materials-handling activity is a function of product characteristics rather than batch activity. Other overhead activities, their costs, and drivers are listed below. Other production information concerning the two hydraulic cylinders is also provided: Required: 1. Using a plantwide rate based on machine hours, calculate the total overhead cost assigned to each product and the unit overhead cost. 2. Using activity rates, calculate the total overhead cost assigned to each product and the unit overhead cost. Comment on the accuracy of the plantwide rate. 3. Calculate the global consumption ratios. 4. Calculate the consumption ratios for welding and materials handling (Assembly) and show that two drivers, welding hours and number of parts, can be used to achieve the same ABC product costs calculated in Requirement 2. Explain the value of this simplification. 5. Calculate the consumption ratios for inspection and engineering, and show that the drivers for these two activities also duplicate the ABC product costs calculated in Requirement 2.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...AccountingISBN:9781337115773Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. HeitgerPublisher:Cengage Learning
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305970663
Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337115773
Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. Heitger
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Cost Accounting - Definition, Purpose, Types, How it Works?; Author: WallStreetMojo;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AwrwUf8vYEY;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY