
The initial trial asphalt content for different blends.

Answer to Problem 16P
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Nominal maximum sieve of each aggregate blend = 19 mm.
Calculation:
For trial blend 1, we have:
The amount of asphalt binder absorbed by the aggregates is estimated
from Eq. 18.18 as
Where,
Substitute the values in the required equation, we have
Estimate the percent of effective asphalt binder by volume using theempirical expression given as follows:
Where,
gradation (mm).
Substitute the values in the required equation, we have
Now, calculate the mass of aggregate by using the following formula:
Where,
Substitute the values, we have
A trial percentage of asphalt binder then is determined for each trial
aggregate blend using the following equation.
Where,
Substitute the values, we have
For trial blend 2, we have:
The amount of asphalt binder absorbed by the aggregates is estimated
from Eq. 18.18 as
Where,
Substitute the values in the required equation, we have
Estimate the percent of effective asphalt binder by volume using the empirical expression given as follows:
Where,
gradation (mm).
Substitute the values in the required equation, we have
Now, calculate the mass of aggregate by using the following formula:
Where,
Substitute the values, we have
A trial percentage of asphalt binder then is determined for each trial
aggregate blend using the following equation.
Where,
Substitute the values, we have
For trial blend 3, we have:
The amount of asphalt binder absorbed by the aggregates is estimated
from Eq. 18.18 as
Where,
Substitute the values in the required equation, we have
Estimate the percent of effective asphalt binder by volume using the empirical expression given as follows:
Where,
gradation (mm).
Substitute the values in the required equation, we have
Now, calculate the mass of aggregate by using the following formula:
Where,
Substitute the values, we have
A trial percentage of asphalt binder then is determined for each trial
aggregate blend using the following equation.
Where,
Substitute the values, we have
Conclusion:
Therefore, the initial trial asphalt content for1st, 2nd and 3rd blends is as follows
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 18 Solutions
Traffic And Highway Engineering
- As shown in the figure below, a 1.5 m × 1.5 m footing is carrying a 400 kN load. P Depth (m) 0.0 1.0 2.0 Df Groundwater table (Yw = 9.81 kN/m³) 3.5 Yt = 16.5 kN/m³ E = 9,000 kPa Sandy soil Ysat 17.5 kN/m³ E = 15,000 kPa 6.0 Stiff Clay (OCR = 2) Bedrock Ysat 18.0 kN/m³ eo = 0.8 Cc = 0.15, Cr = 0.02 Eu =40,000 kPa (a) Estimate the immediate settlement beneath the center of the footing. Assuming that Poisson's ratios of sand and soft clay are 0.3 and 0.5, respectively. Use numerical integration approach. For the calculations, use layers (below the bottom of the footing) of thicknesses: 1 m; 1.5 m, and 2.5 m. (b) Determine the primary consolidation settlement beneath the center of the footing. (c) Redo Part (b) if OCR=1.1. Note: Use the 2:1 method to determine the stress increase below the footing. For parts (b) and (c), use the one-dimensional consolidation theory.arrow_forwardConsider the cross-sections illustrated in the next slides. Implement a cross-sectional analysis based on a layered discretisation of the cross- section as required at the following. 1) Develop the implementation of an analysis to estimate the nonlinear response of the composite steel-concrete section, of the reinforced concrete section and of the steel section shown in following slides (using material nonlinear models provided in the support files). Provide the details of the numerical implementation with clear explanations of all steps. Hint: the implementation can be done in Excel. 2) Discuss how the 3 cross-sections (shown in the next slides) compare to each other in terms of embodied carbon under the condition that the cross-sections possess the same nominal moment capacity (i.e. the peak moment achieved in the moment-curvature diagram). The discussion should include at least 2 sets of the sections (each set contains one composite section, one reinforced concrete section and one…arrow_forwardConsider the following static route choice problem where 110 vehicles travel from point A to point B. The corresponding travel time (in minutes) of each link is as follows: t₁ = x1; t₂ = x2 + 20; t3x3 + 10; t₁ = 3×4 where Xi denotes the number of vehicles that choose link i. Find the number of vehicles that travel on each link when a. The user equilibrium condition (UE) is satisfied, where vehicles select the route with the minimum travel time; and b. The system optimum condition (SO) is satisfied, where the total travel time is minimised. C. Report the total delay savings when satisfying SO instead of UE. 2 B A 3 4arrow_forward
- = α₂+ Assume an origin is connected to a destination with two routes. Assume the travel time of each route has a linear relationship with the traffic flow on the route (t₁ = α₁ + b₁x₁ ; t₂ b2x2). Determine under what condition (e.g. a relationship among the parameters of the performance functions) tolling cannot reduce the total travel time of the two routes.arrow_forwardBeban berjalan pada konstruksi balok seperti pada gambar, tentukan besar gaya dalam yang terjadi dengan metode Garis Pengaruh. Gaya dalam berupa : Reaksi tumpuan RA dan RB, Gaya lintang max di titik C, Momen Maksimum di titik C A + Dimana: B D 10 5 m 5 m P1 = 12t P2 = 6t P3 = 18t q= 6 t/m 2 3 q = 6 t/m P1 P2 P3arrow_forwardConsider the following static route choice problem where 110 vehicles travel from point A to point B. The corresponding travel time (in minutes) of each link is as follows: t₁ = x1 ; t₂ = = x2 + 20; t3 = x3 + 10; t₁ = 3x4 where Xi denotes the number of vehicles that choose link i. Find the number of vehicles that travel on each link when a. The user equilibrium condition (UE) is satisfied, where vehicles select the route with the minimum travel time; and b. The system optimum condition (SO) is satisfied, where the total travel time is minimised. C. Report the total delay savings when satisfying SO instead of UE. 2 A B 3 4arrow_forward
- = Assume an origin is connected to a destination with two routes. Assume the travel time of each route has a linear relationship with the traffic flow on the route (t₁ = α₁ + b₁×₁ ; t₂ b2x2). Determine under what condition (e.g. a relationship among the parameters of the performance functions) tolling cannot reduce the total travel time of the two routes. a2+arrow_forwardFor the soil system presented below, calculate and draw diagrams of distributions of the totaland effective stresses and pore water pressure. Assume an upward water flow with a velocity of0.000,001 cm/s.arrow_forwardRefer to attached problem.arrow_forward
- Calculate: a) effective stresses at points A and B before the placement of foundations 1 and 2, b)the increase of pressure at point A as a result of the placement of the circular foundation 1, c) theincrease of pressure at point B as a result of the placement of the strip foundation 2.arrow_forwardConsider the total head-loss in the system forthis flow is 18.56 ft (head-losses in first and second pipe are 13.83 ft and 4.73 ftrespectively). Please show numerical values for EGL/HGL at the beginning/end/intermediatechange point. (Point distribution: elevation determination 5 points, EGL, HGL lines 4points)arrow_forwardAs shown in the figure below, a 1.5 m × 1.5 m footing is carrying a 400 kN load. P Depth (m) 0.0 1.0 2.0 Df Groundwater table (Yw = 9.81 kN/m³) 3.5 Yt = 16.5 kN/m³ E = 9,000 kPa Sandy soil Ysat 17.5 kN/m³ E = 15,000 kPa 6.0 Stiff Clay (OCR = 2) Bedrock Ysat 18.0 kN/m³ eo = 0.8 Cc = 0.15, Cr = 0.02 Eu =40,000 kPa (a) Estimate the immediate settlement beneath the center of the footing. Assuming that Poisson's ratios of sand and soft clay are 0.3 and 0.5, respectively. Use numerical integration approach. For the calculations, use layers (below the bottom of the footing) of thicknesses: 1 m; 1.5 m, and 2.5 m. (b) Determine the primary consolidation settlement beneath the center of the footing. (c) Redo Part (b) if OCR=1.1. Note: Use the 2:1 method to determine the stress increase below the footing. For parts (b) and (c), use the one-dimensional consolidation theory.arrow_forward
- Traffic and Highway EngineeringCivil EngineeringISBN:9781305156241Author:Garber, Nicholas J.Publisher:Cengage LearningConstruction Materials, Methods and Techniques (M...Civil EngineeringISBN:9781305086272Author:William P. Spence, Eva KultermannPublisher:Cengage LearningFundamentals of Geotechnical Engineering (MindTap...Civil EngineeringISBN:9781305635180Author:Braja M. Das, Nagaratnam SivakuganPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (MindTap C...Civil EngineeringISBN:9781305970939Author:Braja M. Das, Khaled SobhanPublisher:Cengage LearningSolid Waste EngineeringCivil EngineeringISBN:9781305635203Author:Worrell, William A.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Fundamentals Of Construction EstimatingCivil EngineeringISBN:9781337399395Author:Pratt, David J.Publisher:Cengage,





