Concept explainers
Interpretation:
The resonance structures for the given Lewis formulas are to be written by curved arrows and the stabilities of two Lewis formulas are to be compared and the more stable structure, if any, is to be identified.
Concept introduction:
Maximizing the number of bonds and obey the octet rule are the main factors that contribute to the stability of a resonance structure.
When two or more Lewis structure satisfy the octet rule, the structure which have the smallest charge separation is the major contributor.
Among all Lewis structural formulas that satisfy the octet rule, and in which one or more atoms bears the formal charge. The major contributor structure is one in which have the negative charge on the most electronegative atom.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 1 Solutions
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY-PACKAGE >CUSTOM<
- In the Lewis structure for chloromethane, the chlorine atom is sharing _____ electron pair and “owns” _____ of those electrons. Also, the chlorine atom possesses two electrons from each of _____ unshared pairs. The total number of electrons that belong to chlorine is 7 . Chlorine is a Group ____ element. The formal charge on chlorine in chloromethane is ____.arrow_forward. Predicting Chemical Products Directions: The following pairs of atoms form ionic or covalent compounds when bonded. Complete the table below with the needed details. Two answered rows serve as examples. Atoms involved Na, Cl C, I Mg, Cl Ca, F Na, O Ca, N S, CI Type of Bond ionic Lewis dot symbol of each atom Na covalent ·C· ·CI: .. Charge of each ion after electron transfer if ionic bond is formed Na+ CI I Not applicable Lewis dot symbol of each ion if ionic bond is formed Na+ C Not applicable Formula of the Product NaCl Cl4arrow_forwardDecide whether these proposed Lewis structures are reasonable. proposed Lewis structure : H :Z: :Z: N H I H-N-H Is the proposed Lewis structure reasonable? Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* 0 Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* 0 * If two or more atoms of the same element don't satisfy the octet rule, just enter the chemical symbol as many times as necessary. For example, if two oxygen atoms don't satisfy the octet rule, enter "0,0".arrow_forward
- Deciding whether a Lewis structure satisfies the octet rule Decide whether these proposed Lewis structures are reasonable. proposed Lewis structure Is the proposed Lewis structure reasonable? O Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. :0- -0: The correct number is:| .. No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is:| No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is: No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* * If two or more atoms of the same element don't satisfy the octet rule, just enter the chemical symbol as many times as necessary. For example, if two oxygen atoms don't satisfy the…arrow_forwardu have good explanationsarrow_forwardWhich of the following Lewis dot structures is a valid Lewis structure? H +YF H H-P None of these : Si= CI are H- H. plausible/valid. H. :F: Harrow_forward
- What is the structural diagram of CH2ClF without lone pairs? Also what is its Electronegativity bond after you subtract the smaller from the greater value along with its bond type, total lone pairs of electrons and total bonding pairs of electrons? Lastly, is it polar or non polar (polar molecularity) ?arrow_forwardPlease answer both questions as they are calculated together but just a heads up they are different questions. Thank you for helping mearrow_forwardproposed Lewis structure Is the proposed Lewis structure reasonable? Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. *The correct number is:|| No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. :0- C 0: The correct number is:U No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are: Yes. No, it has the wrong number of valence electrons. The correct number is:U Н— Н - H No, it has the right number of valence electrons but doesn't satisfy the octet rule. The symbols of the problem atoms are:* * If two or more atoms of the same element don't satisfy the octet rule, just enter the chemical symbol as many times as necessary. For example, if two oxygen atoms don't satisfy the octet rule, enter "O,0". :0 :arrow_forward
- Which of these best descibe formal charge? Select all that apply. The difference between the number of electrons around an atom in the free state and the number of electrons assigned to the atom in the Lewis structure an atom in a chemical compound. O The formal charge of each atom is calculated by subtracting the number of valence electrons in the neutral atomfrom the number of electrons assigned to the atom. O Can be used to help determine the most reasonable distribution of electrons in a molecule or ion. O The charge that an atom in a molecule or ion would have if all atoms had the same electronegativity.arrow_forwardplease anwer its all one questionarrow_forwardChemistry not physicsarrow_forward
- Chemistry & Chemical ReactivityChemistryISBN:9781133949640Author:John C. Kotz, Paul M. Treichel, John Townsend, David TreichelPublisher:Cengage Learning