South-western Federal Taxation 2018: Individual Income Taxes
41st Edition
ISBN: 9781337385886
Author: William H. Hoffman, James C. Young, William A. Raabe, David M. Maloney, Annette Nellen
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 16, Problem 2RP
To determine
Discuss how to treat the $600,000 payment on person C’s 2019 tax return.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Anita and Duncan had been partners for many years in a mercantile business. Their relationship deteriorated to the point at which Anita threatened to bring an action for an accounting and dissolution of the firm. Duncan then offered to buy Anita’s interest in the partnership for $250,000. Anita refused the offer and told Duncan that she would take no less than $360,000. A short time later, James approached Duncan and informed him he had inside information that a proposed street change would greatly benefit the business and that he, James, would buy the entire business for $1 million or buy a one-half interest for $500,000. Duncan made a final offer of $350,000 to Anita for her interest. Anita accepted this offer, and the transaction was completed. Duncan then sold the one-half interest to James for $500,000. Several months later, Anita learned for the first time of the transaction between Duncan and James. What rights, if any, does Anita have against Duncan?
Adams, by fraudulent representations, induced Barton to purchase one hundred shares of the capital stock of the Evermore Oil Company. The shares were worthless. Barton executed and delivered to Adams a negotiable promissory note for $5,000, dated May 5, in full payment for the shares, due six months after date. On May 20, Adams indorsed and sold the note to Cooper for $4,800. On October 21, Barton, having learned that Cooper now held the note, notified Cooper of the fraud and stated he would not pay the note. On December 1, Cooper negotiated the note to Davis who, while not a party, had full knowledge of the fraud perpetrated on Barton. Upon refusal of Barton to pay the note, Davis sues Barton for $5,000. Is Davis a holder in due course or, if not, does he have the rights of a holder in due course? Explain.
Wilcox, chief executive officer and chairman of the board of directors, owned 60 percent of the shares of Sterling Corporation. When the market price of Sterling’s shares was $22 per share, Wilcox sold all of his shares in Sterling to Conrad for $29 per share. The minority shareholders of Sterling brought suit against Wilcox, demanding a pro rata share of the amount Wilcox received in excess of the market price. a. What are the arguments to support the minority shareholders’ claim for a pro rata share of the amount Wilcox received in excess of the market price? b. What are the arguments to reject the minority shareholders’ claim for a pro rata share of the amount Wilcox received in excess of the market price? c. Which side should prevail?
Chapter 16 Solutions
South-western Federal Taxation 2018: Individual Income Taxes
Ch. 16 - Prob. 1DQCh. 16 - An individual taxpayer sells some used assets at a...Ch. 16 - Alison owns a painting that she received as a gift...Ch. 16 - Prob. 4DQCh. 16 - Prob. 5DQCh. 16 - Prob. 6DQCh. 16 - Prob. 7DQCh. 16 - Prob. 8DQCh. 16 - After netting all of her short-term and long-term...Ch. 16 - Prob. 10DQ
Ch. 16 - Prob. 11DQCh. 16 - Prob. 12CECh. 16 - Prob. 13CECh. 16 - Prob. 14CECh. 16 - Prob. 15CECh. 16 - Prob. 16CECh. 16 - Prob. 17CECh. 16 - Prob. 18CECh. 16 - Prob. 19PCh. 16 - Prob. 20PCh. 16 - Prob. 21PCh. 16 - George is the owner of numerous classic...Ch. 16 - Prob. 23PCh. 16 - Prob. 24PCh. 16 - Prob. 25PCh. 16 - Prob. 26PCh. 16 - Prob. 27PCh. 16 - Prob. 28PCh. 16 - Prob. 29PCh. 16 - Prob. 30PCh. 16 - Prob. 31PCh. 16 - Prob. 32PCh. 16 - Prob. 33PCh. 16 - Prob. 34PCh. 16 - Prob. 35PCh. 16 - Prob. 36PCh. 16 - Prob. 37PCh. 16 - Prob. 38PCh. 16 - Prob. 39PCh. 16 - Prob. 40PCh. 16 - Prob. 41PCh. 16 - Prob. 42PCh. 16 - Prob. 43PCh. 16 - Prob. 44PCh. 16 - Prob. 45PCh. 16 - Prob. 46PCh. 16 - Prob. 47PCh. 16 - Prob. 48PCh. 16 - Prob. 49PCh. 16 - Harriet, who is single, is the owner of a sole...Ch. 16 - Prob. 51CPCh. 16 - Prob. 1RPCh. 16 - Prob. 2RPCh. 16 - Prob. 3RPCh. 16 - Prob. 4RPCh. 16 - Prob. 1CPACh. 16 - Conner purchased 300 shares of Zinco stock for...Ch. 16 - Brad and Angie are married and file a joint...
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- On February 2, Phillips induced Miller to purchase from her fifty shares of stock in the XYZ Corporation for $10,000, representing that the actual book value of each share was $200. A certificate for fifty shares was delivered to Miller. On February 16, Miller discovered that the book value on February 2 was only $50 per share. Will Miller be successful in a lawsuit against Phillips? Why or why not?arrow_forwardLeonard and Arlene Warner sold the Warner Manufacturing Company to Elliott and Carol Archer for $610,000. A few months later the Archers sued the Warners in a state court for fraud connected with the sale. The parties settled the lawsuit for $300,000. The Warners paid the Archers $200,000 and executed a promissory note for the remaining $100,000. After the Warners failed to make the first payment on the $100,000 promissory note, the Archers sued for the payment in state court. The Warners then filed for bankruptcy of the Bankruptcy Code. The Archers claimed that the $100,000 debt was nondischargeable because it was for “money obtained by fraud.” Arlene Warner claimed that the $100,000 debt was dischargeable in bankruptcy because it was a new debt for money promised in a settlement contract and thus it was not a debt for money obtained by fraud.a. What are the arguments that the debt is dischargeable in bankruptcy?b. What are the arguments that the debt is not dischargeable in…arrow_forwardGeorge, an individual, is an architect and general contractor. Gracie is a wealthy individual. Newco’s Certificate of Incorporation states that it is authorized to issue 200 shares, no par value of common stock. Gracie transfers $500,000 of cash to Newco in exchange for 50 shares of Newco's stock. George signs a contract with Newco in which George will perform services designing a housing project and then acting as general contractor on the construction of that housing project. In exchange, George will receive 50 shares of Newco's stock. a. How will A be treated in this transaction? b. Suppose instead that George and Newco do not enter into a written contract. George transfers $500 in cash for 50 shares of Newco's stock while Gracie transfers $500,000 for 50 shares of Newco's stock. George then performs the architectural and contracting services for no further charge. Would this change your answerarrow_forward
- Glen,Dale,and Al are partners who own Fizz.Glen made a capital contribution of $5000,Dale's was $15 000,and Al's was $10 000.Glen is a general partner and he oversees the management of the Fizz business.The partnership borrowed $30 000 from the bank.The partners have no agreement relating to the sharing of profits and losses.Fizz became insolvent and unable to repay the loan.The bank sued Dale personally and recovered the full $30 000 from him.Dale then sued Glen.When Dale's lawyer provided him with advice,what amount did she likely indicate he would be able to legally recover from Glen? A) $5000 B) $10 000 C) $15 000 D) $20 000arrow_forwardTwelve years ago, Adams, Boyd, and Chambers formed a partnership manufacturing small circuit boards. Unfortunately, foreign competition, a softening economy, and management errors have led the partners to realize that the company’s business cannot be sustained and that the partnership must be liquidated. A condensed balance sheet is as follows:(attached)Boyd is extremely concerned that after liquidation of the partnership they would still continue to be personally insolvent. This would be devastating to Boyd, and they have come to you with their concerns.Prepare a response to each of Boyd’s independent questions noting that profits and losses are allocated 40%, 20%, and 20% to Adams, Boyd, and Chambers, respectively.1. If assets with a book value of $180,000 were sold for $200,000 and the partners agreed to maintain a minimum cash balance of $5,000, would any of the available cash be distributed to Boyd?2. If all of the noncash assets were sold for net proceeds of $280,000 and all cash…arrow_forwardKaty Kirkland, a former employee of the Sand Dune Resorts, Inc., owned 500 shares of stock (10%) in the company. Kirkland was terminated after five years of employment at Sand Dunes; however, she became part owner of Holiday Isles, Inc., a competitor of Sand Dunes. When Sand Dunes made Kirkland an offer to purchase her stocks, she requested access to Sand Dunes' corporate books to determine the value of her 500 shares of stock. Sand Dunes refused on the basis that Kirkland was a competitor. Does Kirkland have a right to view the books? Why or why not? Propose a solution to the situation.arrow_forward
- Kimball, a partner in a one-office firm, inherits 15 shares of Spotless Housekeeping Services stock. The stock has a market value of $25 per share; there is a ready market for them; and there are 300,000 shares outstanding. Spotless is an audit client of the firm, and Kimball does no work or consulting for Spotless engagements. Which of the following is CORRECT regarding Kimball receiving this stock and maintaining the firm's independence with Spotless? As long as Kimball does not work on the engagements for Spotless, nothing need be done. If he works on the engagements for Spotless, then the shares must be promptly sold to preserve the firm's independence. Since the shares are worth only $375 and they were inherited, nothing need be done. If Kimball transfers the shares to a blind trust where he is the beneficiary, independence with Spotless will not be impaired. The shares must be sold within 30 days of their receipt.arrow_forwardJessica sold goods to Stacy for $2,500 and retained a security interest in them. Two months later, Stacy filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy. At this time, Stacy still owed Jessica $2,000 for the purchase price of the goods, the value of which was $1,500. a. May the trustee invalidate Jessica’s security interest? If so, under what provision? b. If the security interest is invalidated, what is Jessica’s status in the bankruptcy proceeding? c. If the security interest is not invalidated, what is Jessica’s status in the bankruptcy proceeding?arrow_forward1 Juan transfers land with a fair market value of $300,000 and a basis of $100,000 to Royalty Corporation in return for 100% of their stock. Shortly before the formation of Royalty corp, Juan enters into an agreement with another party where he agrees to sell 30% of the Royalty Corporation stock. Two weeks after Royalty Corp was formed Juan sells the 30% of Royalty stock to the second party who is unrelated. Juan will: A. Have no gains or losses recognized for the formation of Royalty Corporation B. Have a gain worth $60,000 on the formation of Royalty Corporation C. Have a gain worth $200,000 on the formation of Royalty Corporation D. None of the abovearrow_forward
- Peter Diamond owed Carter $500,000 secured by a first mortgage on Diamond’s plant and land. Stephens was a surety on this obligation in the amount of $250,000. After Diamond defaulted on the debt, Carter demanded and received payment of $250,000 from Stephens. Carter then foreclosed upon the mortgage and sold the property for $375,000. What rights, if any, does Stephens have in the proceeds from the sale of the property?arrow_forwardUbaldo is the owner of a building which has been leased by Remigio for the past 20 years. Ubaldo has repeatedly assured Remigio that if he should decide to sell the building, he will give Remigio the right of first refusal. On June 30, 1994, Ubaldo informed Remigio that he was willing to sell the building for P5 Million. The following day, Remigio sent a letter to Ubaldo offering to buy the building at P4.5 Million. Ubaldo did not reply. One week later, Remigio received a letter from Santos informing him that the building has been sold to him by Ubaldo for P5 Million, and that he will not renew Remigio’s lease when it expires. Remigio filed an action against Ubaldo and Santos for cancellation of the sale, and to compel Ubaldo to execute a deed of absolute sale in his favor, based on his right of first refusal. a) Will the action prosper? Explain.arrow_forwardD is indebted to C for P10,000. For the purpose of defrauding C, D sold his only parcel of land to X valued P10,000. X has no knowledge of the intention of D. a. The contract D and X is binding. b. The contract is voidable because S is in bad faith. c. The right of C is to rescind the contract because the transaction is fraudulent. d. The contract between D and X is rescissible.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Individual Income TaxesAccountingISBN:9780357109731Author:HoffmanPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
Individual Income Taxes
Accounting
ISBN:9780357109731
Author:Hoffman
Publisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT