EBK CORPORATE FINANCE
4th Edition
ISBN: 9780134202785
Author: DeMarzo
Publisher: VST
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Videos
Textbook Question
Chapter 16, Problem 28P
If it is managed efficiently, Remel Inc. will have assets with a market value of $50 million, $100 million, or $150 million next year, with each outcome being equally likely. However, managers may engage in wasteful empire building, which will reduce the firm's market value by $5 million in all cases. Managers may also increase the risk of the firm, changing the probability of each outcome to 50%, 10%, and 40%, respectively.
- a. What is the expected value of Remel’s assets if it is run efficiently? Suppose managers will engage in empire building unless that behavior increases the likelihood of bankruptcy. They will choose the risk of the firm to maximize the expected payoff to equity holders.
- b. Suppose Remel has debt due in one year as shown below. For each case, indicate whether managers will engage in empire building, and whether they will increase risk. What is the expected value of Remel’s assets in each case?
- i. $44 million
- ii. $49 million
- iii. $90 million
- iv. $99 million
- c. Suppose the tax savings from the debt, after including investor taxes, is equal to 10% of the expected payoff of the debt. The proceeds from the debt, as well as the value of any tax savings, will be paid out to shareholders immediately as a dividend when the debt is issued. Which debt level in part (b) is optimal for Remel?
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
A firm is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO wants to use the IRR criterion, while the CFO favors the NPV method. You were hired to advise the firm on the best procedure. If the wrong decision criterion is used, how much potential value would the firm lose? (compare NPVs for projects)WACC: 6.75%Year 0 1 2 3 4 CFS -$1,025 $380 $380 $380 $380CFL -$2,150 $765 $765 $765 $765
A firm is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are
mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO wants to use the IRR
criterion, while the CFO favors the NPV method. You were hired to advise the firm on the
best procedure, given a WACC of 15%. If the wrong decision criterion is used, how much
potential value would the firm lose?
Project
Year 0
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
S
-$995 million
$385 million
$400 million
$525 million
$650 million
L
-$2.05 billion
$705 million
$835 million
$950 million
$1.025 billion
$6.04 million
O $359.08 million
$46.04 million
$451.15 million
O $405.11 million
Fountain Corporation’s economists estimate that a good business environment and a bad business environment are equally likely for the coming year. The managers of the company must choose between two mutually exclusive projects. Assume that the project the company chooses will be the firm’s only activity and that the firm will close one year from today. The company is obligated to make a $4,100 payment to bondholders at the end of the year. The projects have the same systematic risk but different volatilities. Consider the following information pertaining to the two projects:
Economy
Probability
Low-Volatility Project Payoff
High-Volatility Project Payoff
Bad
.50
$ 4,100
$ 3,500
Good
.50
4,600
5,200
a.
What is the expected value of the company if the low-volatility project is undertaken? The high-volatility project? (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answers to the nearest whole number, e.g., 32.)
b.
What is the expected value of the…
Chapter 16 Solutions
EBK CORPORATE FINANCE
Ch. 16.1 - Prob. 1CCCh. 16.1 - Does the risk of default reduce the value of the...Ch. 16.2 - If a firm files for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of...Ch. 16.2 - Why are the losses of debt holders whose claims...Ch. 16.3 - Prob. 1CCCh. 16.3 - True or False: If bankruptcy costs are only...Ch. 16.4 - Prob. 1CCCh. 16.4 - According to the trade-off theory, all else being...Ch. 16.5 - Prob. 1CCCh. 16.5 - Why would debt holders desire covenants that...
Ch. 16.6 - Prob. 1CCCh. 16.6 - Prob. 2CCCh. 16.7 - Coca-Cola Enterprises is almost 50% debt financed...Ch. 16.7 - Why would a firm with excessive leverage not...Ch. 16.7 - Describe how management entrenchment can affect...Ch. 16.8 - How does asymmetric information explain the...Ch. 16.8 - Prob. 2CCCh. 16.9 - Prob. 1CCCh. 16.9 - Prob. 2CCCh. 16 - Gladstone Corporation is about to launch a new...Ch. 16 - Baruk Industries has no cash and a debt obligation...Ch. 16 - When a firm defaults on its debt, debt holders...Ch. 16 - Prob. 4PCh. 16 - Prob. 5PCh. 16 - Suppose Tefco Corp. has a value of 100 million if...Ch. 16 - You have received two job offers. Firm A offers to...Ch. 16 - As in Problem 1, Gladstone Corporation is about to...Ch. 16 - Kohwe Corporation plans to issue equity to raise...Ch. 16 - Prob. 10PCh. 16 - Prob. 11PCh. 16 - Hawar International is a shipping firm with a...Ch. 16 - Your firm is considering issuing one-year debt,...Ch. 16 - Marpor Industries has no debt and expects to...Ch. 16 - Real estate purchases are often financed with at...Ch. 16 - On May 14, 2008, General Motors paid a dividend of...Ch. 16 - Prob. 17PCh. 16 - Consider a firm whose only asset is a plot of...Ch. 16 - Prob. 19PCh. 16 - Prob. 20PCh. 16 - Prob. 21PCh. 16 - Consider the setting of Problem 21 , and suppose...Ch. 16 - Consider the setting of Problems 21 and 22, and...Ch. 16 - You own your own firm, and you want to raise 30...Ch. 16 - Empire Industries forecasts net income this coming...Ch. 16 - Ralston Enterprises has assets that will have a...Ch. 16 - Prob. 27PCh. 16 - If it is managed efficiently, Remel Inc. will have...Ch. 16 - Which of the following industries have low optimal...Ch. 16 - According to the managerial entrenchment theory,...Ch. 16 - Info Systems Technology (IST) manufactures...Ch. 16 - Prob. 32PCh. 16 - Prob. 33P
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, finance and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Executives at XYZ Corporation realize that they have too much liquid assets. They want to use this cash to buy a company that has decent returns to maximize their asset utilization. They find two companies they can buy, and want to decide if they should acquire company A or Company B. The expected returns from both companies depending on the state of the economy are shown in the table below. Each state of the economy is equally likely to happen. State of the economy Return on company A(%) Return on company B (%) Worse than expected 7.3% -4.7% Expected 11.5% 5.4% Better than expected 16.6% 24.3% Calculate the expected rate of return, and standard deviation of each company. Critically evaluate the importance of the standard deviation factor in comparing investments.arrow_forwardExecutives at XYZ Corporation realize that they have too much liquid assets. They want to use this cash to buy a company that has decent returns to maximize their asset utilization. They find two companies they can buy, and want to decide if they should acquire company A or Company B. The expected returns from both companies depending on the state of the economy are shown in the table below. Each state of the economy is equally likely to happen. State of the economy Return on company A(%) Return on company B (%) Worse than expected 7.3% -4.7% Expected 11.5% 5.4% Better than expected 16.6% 24.3% Calculate the expected rate of return, and standard deviation of each company. [Note: you are supposed to show every step of your calculation and interpret the result.] Critically evaluate the importance of the standard deviation factor in comparing investments. [Note: remember to use Harvard referencing to reference your sources]arrow_forwardExecutives at XYZ Corporation realize that they have too much liquid assets. They want to use this cash to buy a company that has decent returns to maximize their asset utilization. They find two companies they can buy, and want to decide if they should acquire company A or Company B. The expected returns from both companies depending on the state of the economy are shown in the table below. Each state of the economy is equally likely to happen. State of the economy Return on company A(%) Return on company B (%) Worse than expected 7.3% -4.7% Expected 11.5% 5.4% Better than expected 16.6% 24.3% Calculate the expected rate of return, and standard deviation of each company. [Note: you are supposed to show every step of your calculation and interpret the result.arrow_forward
- Fountain Corporation’s economists estimate that a good business environment and a bad business environment are equally likely for the coming year. The managers of the company must choose between two mutually exclusive projects. Assume that the project the company chooses will be the firm’s only activity and that the firm will close one year from today. The company is obligated to make a $4,200 payment to bondholders at the end of the year. The projects have the same systematic risk but different volatilities. Consider the following information pertaining to the two projects: Economy Probability Low-Volatility Project Payoff High-Volatility Project Payoff Bad .50 $ 4,200 $ 3,400 Good .50 4,600 4,900 a. What is the expected value of the company if the low-volatility project is undertaken? What if the high-volatility project is undertaken? (Do not round intermediate calculations.) b. What is the expected value of the company’s equity if the low-volatility…arrow_forwardis my response accuratearrow_forwardA firm is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO wants to use the IRR criterion, while the CFO favors the NPV method. You were hired to advise the firm on the best procedure. If the wrong decision criterion is used, how much potential value would the firm lose? WACC: 6.00% Year 0 1 2 3 4 CFS -$1,025 $380 $380 $380 $380 CFL -$2,150 $765 $765 $765 $765 $198.61 $219.51 $209.07 O $188.67 $230.55arrow_forward
- Ezekiel Enterprises recently made a large investment to upgrade its technology. Whilethese improvements won’t have much effect on performance in the short run, they areexpected to reduce future costs significantly. What effect will this investment have onEzekiel Enterprises’ earnings per share this year? What effect might this investment haveon the company’s intrinsic value and stock price?arrow_forwardWSP Inc. is involved in a wide range of unrelated projects. The company will pursue any project that it thinks will create value for its stockholders. Consequently, the risk level of the company’s projects tends to vary a great deal from project to project. If WSP Inc. does not risk-adjust its discount rate for specific projects properly, which of the following is likely to occur over time? Check all that apply. The firm will increase in value. The firm’s overall risk level will increase. The firm could potentially reject projects that provide a higher rate of return than the company should require. When a project involves an entirely new product line, the firm may be able to obtain betas from to calculate a weighted average cost of capital (WACC) for its new product line. Consider the case of another company. Chrome Printing is evaluating two mutually exclusive projects. They both require a $1 million investment today and have expected NPVs of…arrow_forwardA firm is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO wants to use the IRR criterion, while the CFO favors the NPV method. You were hired to advise the firm on the best procedure. If the wrong decision criterion is used, how much potential value would the firm lose? The WACC = 6.75% 1 2 3 4 CFs -$1,025 $380 $380 $380 $380 CFL -$2,150 $765 $765 $765 $765arrow_forward
- A colleague recommends a shortcut to value the company in the question in attached photo. Rather than compute each scenario separately, the colleague recommends averaging each input, such that growth equals 4 percent and ROIC equals 12 percent. Will this lead to the same enterprise value as you found in the question attached in the photo? Which method is correct? Why?arrow_forwardAs the general manager of a firm, you are presented with an investment proposal from one of your divisions. Its net present value, if discounted at the cost of capital for your firm (which is 15 percent), is $ 1 00,000, and its internal rate of return is 20 percent. (a) What are the economic interpretations of the net present value and internal rate of return figures? In other words, what do they mean? (b) What, if any, additional information would you like to have before approving the project?arrow_forward15. Sanitorium Brewing Company (SBC) must set its investment and dividend/repurchases policies for next year. It has 900,000 shares and its expected share price next year is $32.00. It can select from three independent projects, each of which will require a $3.5M investment. The projects have different risk levels, so SBC is appropriately evaluating them using different costs of capital. Assuming normal cashflows, the projected IRRS and costs of capital follow: Cost of Capital IRR 20% Project A: Project B: Project C: 17% 13% 10% 7% 9% SBC wants to maintain its 40% debt and 60% common equity capital structure, and it expects net income of $5.0M next year. If SBC also keeps its residual dividend policy (with all distributions as dividends, not share repurchases), what will its payout ratio be next year?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course ...StatisticsISBN:9781305627734Author:Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. AndersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENTFinanceISBN:9781337514835Author:MOYERPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
Financial Reporting, Financial Statement Analysis...FinanceISBN:9781285190907Author:James M. Wahlen, Stephen P. Baginski, Mark BradshawPublisher:Cengage Learning
Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course...FinanceISBN:9781337395083Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. DavesPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course ...
Statistics
ISBN:9781305627734
Author:Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. Anderson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Finance
ISBN:9781337514835
Author:MOYER
Publisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
Financial Reporting, Financial Statement Analysis...
Finance
ISBN:9781285190907
Author:James M. Wahlen, Stephen P. Baginski, Mark Bradshaw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course...
Finance
ISBN:9781337395083
Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. Daves
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Financial Risks - Part 1; Author: KnowledgEquity - Support for CPA;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFjSYlBS-VE;License: Standard youtube license