The observations on the field on the basis of natural selection. Also, to determine whether government should regulate pesticide application to prevent insects from evolving resistance or not. Introduction: A farmer applies a new pesticide to his field. He applied the pesticide as it was directed by the manufacturer, but the farmer lost 15% of his crops to insects. A second farmer applied three times pesticide by learning the results of the former. He lost only 3% of his crops. Both these farmers continued to apply the pesticide the same way for the next 5 years. At the end, the first farmer was still losing 15% of his crops, but the second farmer lost 40% of his crops.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 16, Problem 1TC

Summary Introduction

To determine:

The observations on the field on the basis of natural selection. Also, to determine whether government should regulate pesticide application to prevent insects from evolving resistance or not.

Introduction:

A farmer applies a new pesticide to his field. He applied the pesticide as it was directed by the manufacturer, but the farmer lost 15% of his crops to insects. A second farmer applied three times pesticide by learning the results of the former. He lost only 3% of his crops. Both these farmers continued to apply the pesticide the same way for the next 5 years. At the end, the first farmer was still losing 15% of his crops, but the second farmer lost 40% of his crops.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The term “natural selection” was given and popularized by Charles Darwin. Simply, it is defined as “survival of the fittest”. It is the differential survival of organisms on the basis of their phenotype and genotype. Natural selection is the key to evolution.

The second farmer was applying three times more pesticide as directed by the manufacturer. This caused the insects to become resistant to it. When he applied the pesticide for the first time, many of the insects died because these were not resistant to it. As time passed, some insects developed mutation and became resistant. Natural selection allowed their growth and reproduction. At the end, all the insects became resistant to that particular pesticide and damaged 40% of the farmer’s crop.

Government should regulate the application of pesticides in order to prevent insects from evolving resistance as it would lead to the development of superpests that cannot be controlled with any pesticide or insecticide. Government should put certain restrictions on the usage of pesticides. There should be a limit for this. Otherwise, strict actions should be taken against the farmer or some penalty should be fixed for this purposes.

Conclusion

Too much use of pesticide or any other chemical can induce mutation and natural selection will make a whole new population of insects that are resistant and can also lead to the creation of superpests.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Your goal is to produce black seeds resistant to mold. So you make the same cross again (between a homozygous black seeded, mold susceptible parent and a homozygous white seeded and mold resistant parent), and, again, advance progeny by SSD to create 100 F10 generation plants. Based on the information you obtained from your first crossing experiment (Question #4), how many F10 plants would you expect to have black seeds and be resistant to mold? Assume that a toxin produced by the mold fungus has been isolated. Only mold resistant seeds will germinate in the presence of the toxin. Could you use this toxin screening procedure to have segregation distortion work in your favor in the F2 generation? Explain your answer. Info from Question 4 a. P Locus (Seed Color): Hypothesis: The null hypothesis (H₀) is that seed color is controlled by alleles at a single locus. Observed Data: Total white seeds: 45 (resistant plants) + 6 (susceptible plants) = 51 Total black seeds: 7 (resistant…

10. Consider the following enzyme and its substrate where the "+" and "-" indicate cations and anions, respectively. Explain which of the following inhibitors could inhibit this enzyme? Which type of inhibitor would it be and why? (Video 5-2) Substrate Enzyme Potential inhibitors

Using Punnett Squares Punnett squares are one good way to predict the outcome of genetic crosses. Punnett squares use mathematical probability to help predict the genotype and phenotype combinations in genetic crosses. The number of possible alleles from each parent determines the number of rows and columns in the Punnett square. Independent Assortment KEY QUESTION How do alleles segregate when more than one gene is involved? Mendel wondered if the segregation of one pair of alleles affects another pair. For example, does the gene that determines the shape of a seed affect the gene for seed color? This type of experiment is known as a two-factor, or dihybrid, cross because it involves two different genes. Single-gene crosses are monohybrid crosses. Visual Reading Tool: Two-Factor Cross: F₂ The Punnett square shows the results of self-crossing the F, generation of a cross between round yellow peas and wrinkled green peas. 1. List the different genotypes in the F, generation. What is the…

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 16, Problem 1TC

Summary Introduction

To determine:

The observations on the field on the basis of natural selection. Also, to determine whether government should regulate pesticide application to prevent insects from evolving resistance or not.

Introduction:

A farmer applies a new pesticide to his field. He applied the pesticide as it was directed by the manufacturer, but the farmer lost 15% of his crops to insects. A second farmer applied three times pesticide by learning the results of the former. He lost only 3% of his crops. Both these farmers continued to apply the pesticide the same way for the next 5 years. At the end, the first farmer was still losing 15% of his crops, but the second farmer lost 40% of his crops.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The term “natural selection” was given and popularized by Charles Darwin. Simply, it is defined as “survival of the fittest”. It is the differential survival of organisms on the basis of their phenotype and genotype. Natural selection is the key to evolution.

The second farmer was applying three times more pesticide as directed by the manufacturer. This caused the insects to become resistant to it. When he applied the pesticide for the first time, many of the insects died because these were not resistant to it. As time passed, some insects developed mutation and became resistant. Natural selection allowed their growth and reproduction. At the end, all the insects became resistant to that particular pesticide and damaged 40% of the farmer’s crop.

Government should regulate the application of pesticides in order to prevent insects from evolving resistance as it would lead to the development of superpests that cannot be controlled with any pesticide or insecticide. Government should put certain restrictions on the usage of pesticides. There should be a limit for this. Otherwise, strict actions should be taken against the farmer or some penalty should be fixed for this purposes.

Conclusion

Too much use of pesticide or any other chemical can induce mutation and natural selection will make a whole new population of insects that are resistant and can also lead to the creation of superpests.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 16, Problem 1TC

Summary Introduction

To determine:

The observations on the field on the basis of natural selection. Also, to determine whether government should regulate pesticide application to prevent insects from evolving resistance or not.

Introduction:

A farmer applies a new pesticide to his field. He applied the pesticide as it was directed by the manufacturer, but the farmer lost 15% of his crops to insects. A second farmer applied three times pesticide by learning the results of the former. He lost only 3% of his crops. Both these farmers continued to apply the pesticide the same way for the next 5 years. At the end, the first farmer was still losing 15% of his crops, but the second farmer lost 40% of his crops.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The term “natural selection” was given and popularized by Charles Darwin. Simply, it is defined as “survival of the fittest”. It is the differential survival of organisms on the basis of their phenotype and genotype. Natural selection is the key to evolution.

The second farmer was applying three times more pesticide as directed by the manufacturer. This caused the insects to become resistant to it. When he applied the pesticide for the first time, many of the insects died because these were not resistant to it. As time passed, some insects developed mutation and became resistant. Natural selection allowed their growth and reproduction. At the end, all the insects became resistant to that particular pesticide and damaged 40% of the farmer’s crop.

Government should regulate the application of pesticides in order to prevent insects from evolving resistance as it would lead to the development of superpests that cannot be controlled with any pesticide or insecticide. Government should put certain restrictions on the usage of pesticides. There should be a limit for this. Otherwise, strict actions should be taken against the farmer or some penalty should be fixed for this purposes.

Conclusion

Too much use of pesticide or any other chemical can induce mutation and natural selection will make a whole new population of insects that are resistant and can also lead to the creation of superpests.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 16, Problem 1TC

Summary Introduction

To determine:

The observations on the field on the basis of natural selection. Also, to determine whether government should regulate pesticide application to prevent insects from evolving resistance or not.

Introduction:

A farmer applies a new pesticide to his field. He applied the pesticide as it was directed by the manufacturer, but the farmer lost 15% of his crops to insects. A second farmer applied three times pesticide by learning the results of the former. He lost only 3% of his crops. Both these farmers continued to apply the pesticide the same way for the next 5 years. At the end, the first farmer was still losing 15% of his crops, but the second farmer lost 40% of his crops.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The term “natural selection” was given and popularized by Charles Darwin. Simply, it is defined as “survival of the fittest”. It is the differential survival of organisms on the basis of their phenotype and genotype. Natural selection is the key to evolution.

The second farmer was applying three times more pesticide as directed by the manufacturer. This caused the insects to become resistant to it. When he applied the pesticide for the first time, many of the insects died because these were not resistant to it. As time passed, some insects developed mutation and became resistant. Natural selection allowed their growth and reproduction. At the end, all the insects became resistant to that particular pesticide and damaged 40% of the farmer’s crop.

Government should regulate the application of pesticides in order to prevent insects from evolving resistance as it would lead to the development of superpests that cannot be controlled with any pesticide or insecticide. Government should put certain restrictions on the usage of pesticides. There should be a limit for this. Otherwise, strict actions should be taken against the farmer or some penalty should be fixed for this purposes.

Conclusion

Too much use of pesticide or any other chemical can induce mutation and natural selection will make a whole new population of insects that are resistant and can also lead to the creation of superpests.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 16, Problem 1TC

Summary Introduction

To determine:

The observations on the field on the basis of natural selection. Also, to determine whether government should regulate pesticide application to prevent insects from evolving resistance or not.

Introduction:

A farmer applies a new pesticide to his field. He applied the pesticide as it was directed by the manufacturer, but the farmer lost 15% of his crops to insects. A second farmer applied three times pesticide by learning the results of the former. He lost only 3% of his crops. Both these farmers continued to apply the pesticide the same way for the next 5 years. At the end, the first farmer was still losing 15% of his crops, but the second farmer lost 40% of his crops.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The term “natural selection” was given and popularized by Charles Darwin. Simply, it is defined as “survival of the fittest”. It is the differential survival of organisms on the basis of their phenotype and genotype. Natural selection is the key to evolution.

The second farmer was applying three times more pesticide as directed by the manufacturer. This caused the insects to become resistant to it. When he applied the pesticide for the first time, many of the insects died because these were not resistant to it. As time passed, some insects developed mutation and became resistant. Natural selection allowed their growth and reproduction. At the end, all the insects became resistant to that particular pesticide and damaged 40% of the farmer’s crop.

Government should regulate the application of pesticides in order to prevent insects from evolving resistance as it would lead to the development of superpests that cannot be controlled with any pesticide or insecticide. Government should put certain restrictions on the usage of pesticides. There should be a limit for this. Otherwise, strict actions should be taken against the farmer or some penalty should be fixed for this purposes.

Conclusion

Too much use of pesticide or any other chemical can induce mutation and natural selection will make a whole new population of insects that are resistant and can also lead to the creation of superpests.

Answer 6

Chapter 16, Problem 1TC

Summary Introduction

To determine:

The observations on the field on the basis of natural selection. Also, to determine whether government should regulate pesticide application to prevent insects from evolving resistance or not.

Introduction:

A farmer applies a new pesticide to his field. He applied the pesticide as it was directed by the manufacturer, but the farmer lost 15% of his crops to insects. A second farmer applied three times pesticide by learning the results of the former. He lost only 3% of his crops. Both these farmers continued to apply the pesticide the same way for the next 5 years. At the end, the first farmer was still losing 15% of his crops, but the second farmer lost 40% of his crops.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The term “natural selection” was given and popularized by Charles Darwin. Simply, it is defined as “survival of the fittest”. It is the differential survival of organisms on the basis of their phenotype and genotype. Natural selection is the key to evolution.

The second farmer was applying three times more pesticide as directed by the manufacturer. This caused the insects to become resistant to it. When he applied the pesticide for the first time, many of the insects died because these were not resistant to it. As time passed, some insects developed mutation and became resistant. Natural selection allowed their growth and reproduction. At the end, all the insects became resistant to that particular pesticide and damaged 40% of the farmer’s crop.

Government should regulate the application of pesticides in order to prevent insects from evolving resistance as it would lead to the development of superpests that cannot be controlled with any pesticide or insecticide. Government should put certain restrictions on the usage of pesticides. There should be a limit for this. Otherwise, strict actions should be taken against the farmer or some penalty should be fixed for this purposes.

Conclusion

Too much use of pesticide or any other chemical can induce mutation and natural selection will make a whole new population of insects that are resistant and can also lead to the creation of superpests.

Answer 7

Chapter 16, Problem 1TC

Summary Introduction

To determine:

The observations on the field on the basis of natural selection. Also, to determine whether government should regulate pesticide application to prevent insects from evolving resistance or not.

Introduction:

A farmer applies a new pesticide to his field. He applied the pesticide as it was directed by the manufacturer, but the farmer lost 15% of his crops to insects. A second farmer applied three times pesticide by learning the results of the former. He lost only 3% of his crops. Both these farmers continued to apply the pesticide the same way for the next 5 years. At the end, the first farmer was still losing 15% of his crops, but the second farmer lost 40% of his crops.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The term “natural selection” was given and popularized by Charles Darwin. Simply, it is defined as “survival of the fittest”. It is the differential survival of organisms on the basis of their phenotype and genotype. Natural selection is the key to evolution.

The second farmer was applying three times more pesticide as directed by the manufacturer. This caused the insects to become resistant to it. When he applied the pesticide for the first time, many of the insects died because these were not resistant to it. As time passed, some insects developed mutation and became resistant. Natural selection allowed their growth and reproduction. At the end, all the insects became resistant to that particular pesticide and damaged 40% of the farmer’s crop.

Government should regulate the application of pesticides in order to prevent insects from evolving resistance as it would lead to the development of superpests that cannot be controlled with any pesticide or insecticide. Government should put certain restrictions on the usage of pesticides. There should be a limit for this. Otherwise, strict actions should be taken against the farmer or some penalty should be fixed for this purposes.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Conclusion

Too much use of pesticide or any other chemical can induce mutation and natural selection will make a whole new population of insects that are resistant and can also lead to the creation of superpests.

Answer 12

Ch. 16.1 - 1. List the five conditions necessary for...Ch. 16.1 - Prob. 2CYP Ch. 16.2 - Prob. 1CYP Ch. 16.2 - Prob. 2CYP Ch. 16.2 - Prob. 3CYP Ch. 16.3 - Prob. 1CYP Ch. 16.3 - 2. Demonstrate how sickle-cell disease is an...Ch. 16 - Prob. 1TC Ch. 16 - You are observing a grouse population in which two...Ch. 16 - Prob. 3TC

Videos

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 16 Solutions