Operations Management (Comp. Instructor's Edition)
Operations Management (Comp. Instructor's Edition)
13th Edition
ISBN: 9781259948237
Author: Stevenson
Publisher: MCG
bartleby

Concept explainers

bartleby

Videos

Textbook Question
100%
Book Icon
Chapter 15, Problem 3P

A manager must make a decision on shipping. There are two shippers, A and B. Both offer a two-day rate: A for $500 and B for $525. In addition, A offers a three-day rate of $460 and a nine-day rate of $400, and B offers a four-day rate of $450 and a seven-day rate of $410. Annual holding costs are 35 percent of unit price. Three hundred boxes are to be shipped, and each box has a price of $ 140. Which shipping alternative would you recommend? Explain.

Expert Solution & Answer
Check Mark
Summary Introduction

To decide: Which shipping alternative is suitable.

Introduction: Supply chain defined as a sequence of associations, their offices, capacities, and actions that are engaged with manufacturing and conveying a product or administration. The chain starts with essential providers of raw materials and stretches out the distance to the last client.

The supply chain fragment required with getting the completed item from the producer to the purchaser is known as distribution channel. A supply chain is a sequence starts with essential providers or raw materials and stretches out the distance to an item or administration. No business association can exist without the two operations and supply chain.

Answer to Problem 3P

It is recommended that the shipping A and two-day shipping alternatives should be selected.  

Explanation of Solution

Given:

It is given that there are two shippers A and B both offering two-day shipping alternative with A costing $500 and B costing $525. Shipper A offers three-day shipping alternative for $460 and nine-day shipping alternative for $450. Shipper B offers four-day shipping alternative for $450 and seven-date shipping for $410. Annual holding costs are 35% of unit price and each box is priced at $140 per unit. The total units shipped are 300 units.

Calculate the holding cost per year:

It is calculated by multiplying the percentage of annual holding costs with unit price.

HoldingCostperyear=[UnitPrice×AnnualHoldingCosts]=[$140×30%]=$49

Calculate the total cost of shipper A with two-days shipping alternative:

It is calculated by multiplying total units with holding cost per year and days of shipping and the result is divided with 365 days and the whole result is added to the shipping cost.

TotalCostShipperAwithtwodays=[ShippingCostShipperA+(HoldingCost×TotalUnits×ShippingDays365)]=[$500+($49×300×2365)]=[$500+($29,400365)]=[$500+$80.5479]=$580.5479or$580.55

Calculate the total cost of shipper A with three-days shipping alternative:

It is calculated by multiplying total units with holding cost per year and days of shipping and the result is divided with 365 days and the whole result is added to the shipping cost.

TotalCostShipperAwiththreedays=[ShippingCostShipperA+(HoldingCost×TotalUnits×ShippingDays365)]=[$460+($49×300×3365)]=[$460+($44,100365)]=[$460+$120.8219]=$580.8219or$580.82

Calculate the total cost of shipper A with nine-days shipping alternative:

It is calculated by multiplying total units with holding cost per year and days of shipping and the result is divided with 365 days and the whole result is added to the shipping cost.

TotalCostShipperAwithninedays=[ShippingCostShipperA+(HoldingCost×TotalUnits×ShippingDays365)]=[$400+($49×300×9365)]=[$400+($132,300365)]=[$400+$362.4658]=$762.4658or$762.47

Calculate the total cost of shipper B with two-days shipping alternative:

It is calculated by multiplying total units with holding cost per year and days of shipping and the result is divided with 365 days and the whole result is added to the shipping cost.

TotalCostShipperBwithtwodays=[ShippingCostShipperB+(HoldingCost×TotalUnits×ShippingDays365)]=[$525+($49×300×2365)]=[$525+($29,400365)]=[$525+$80.5479]=$605.5479or$605.55

Calculate the total cost of shipper B with four-days shipping alternative:

It is calculated by multiplying total units with holding cost per year and days of shipping and the result is divided with 365 days and the whole result is added to the shipping cost.

TotalCostShipperBwithfourdays=[ShippingCostShipperB+(HoldingCost×TotalUnits×ShippingDays365)]=[$450+($49×300×4365)]=[$450+($58,800365)]=[$450+$161.0959]=$611.0959or$611.10

Calculate the total cost of shipper B with seven-days shipping alternative:

It is calculated by multiplying total units with holding cost per year and days of shipping and the result is divided with 365 days and the whole result is added to the shipping cost.

TotalCostShipperBwithsevendays=[ShippingCostShipperB+(HoldingCost×TotalUnits×ShippingDays365)]=[$410+($49×300×7365)]=[$410+($102,900365)]=[$410+$281.9178]=$691.9178or$691.92

From the results obtained Shipper A with offering two-day shipping alternative is low compared to other shipping alternatives.

Hence, it is recommended that the shipping A and two-day shipping alternatives should be selected.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
Summarize chapters 1 through 8 of the book "food and beverage cost control"
Can you guys help me with this? Thank you! Here's the question: Compared to the CONSTRAINT model, how has the network changed? How do you plan to add contingency to your network? Please answer this thoroughly Here's the what-if scenario: Assume that the LA warehouse becomes temporarily or even indefinitely disabled since facing a large-scale labor disruption. Re-optimize the network considering this new constraint. Here's the scenario comparison analysis:  Scenario Constraint Scenario vs What-if Scenario Summary The Constraint Scenario exhibits a higher total cost of $7,424,575.45 compared to the What-if Scenario's total cost of $6,611,905.60, signifying a difference of approximately $812,669.85, which indicates a more expensive operation in the Constraint Scenario. The average service time is slightly higher in the Constraint Scenario (0.72 days vs. 0.70 days), suggesting that the What-if Scenario provides a marginally quicker service. Moreover, the average end-to-end service time…
Can you guys help me with this? Thank you! Here's the question: Compared to the CONSTRAINT model, how has the network changed? How do you plan to add contingency to your network? Please answer this throughly Here's the what-if scenario: Assume that Dallas plant has lost power. It cannot serve the DCs anymore and has to remain locked indefinitely. Re-optimize the network considering this new constraint. Here's the scenario comparison analysis:  Scenario Constraint Scenario vs What-if Scenario Summary In comparing the Constraint Scenario to the What-if Scenario, a few key differences highlight the efficiencies evident in the supply chain. Firstly, the total cost in the Constraint Scenario is lower at $7,424,575.45, while the What-if Scenario incurs a total cost of $7,486,369.12, resulting in a cost delta of $61,793.67. Additionally, although both scenarios exhibit the same average service time of 0.72 days, the What-if Scenario has a more favorable average end-to-end service time of 2.41…
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Operations Management
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, operations-management and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
  • Text book image
    Practical Management Science
    Operations Management
    ISBN:9781337406659
    Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
    Publisher:Cengage,
    Text book image
    Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
    Operations Management
    ISBN:9781285869681
    Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
    Publisher:Cengage Learning
    Text book image
    MARKETING 2018
    Marketing
    ISBN:9780357033753
    Author:Pride
    Publisher:CENGAGE L
  • Text book image
    Marketing
    Marketing
    ISBN:9780357033791
    Author:Pride, William M
    Publisher:South Western Educational Publishing
Text book image
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:Cengage,
Text book image
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
MARKETING 2018
Marketing
ISBN:9780357033753
Author:Pride
Publisher:CENGAGE L
Text book image
Marketing
Marketing
ISBN:9780357033791
Author:Pride, William M
Publisher:South Western Educational Publishing
Single Exponential Smoothing & Weighted Moving Average Time Series Forecasting; Author: Matt Macarty;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjETktmL4Kg;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY
Introduction to Forecasting - with Examples; Author: Dr. Bharatendra Rai;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98K7AG32qv8;License: Standard Youtube License