
Concept explainers
a)
To determine: Sequence of jobs based on decision rule First Come First Served (FCFS).
Introduction: First Come First Served is the
a)

Answer to Problem 19P
The sequence is A-B-C-D-E.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
The following information has been given:
Job | Date order received | Production days needed | Due date |
A | 110 | 20 | 180 |
B | 120 | 30 | 200 |
C | 122 | 10 | 175 |
D | 125 | 16 | 230 |
E | 130 | 18 | 210 |
All the jobs are arrived on day 130.
Determine the sequence of the job using FCFS:
Job sequence | Processing time | Flow time | Due date | Start day | End day | Lateness |
A | 20 | 20 | 180 | 130 | 149 | |
B | 30 | 50 | 200 | 150 | 179 | |
C | 10 | 60 | 175 | 180 | 189 | 14 |
D | 16 | 76 | 230 | 190 | 205 | |
E | 18 | 94 | 210 | 206 | 223 | 13 |
Total | 94 | 300 | 27 |
Working note:
Duration and due date for the jobs has been given. Flow time is the cumulative value of the duration. Jobs arrival rate is given as 130.
End day of Job A:
Jobs arrival rate is given as 130. End day is calculated by adding the start day with the value attained by subtracting 1 from the duration. Hence, the end day of Job A is 149.
End day of Job B:
Start day of Job B is the next day of the end day of Job A. End day is calculated by adding the start day with the value attained by subtracting 1 from the duration. Hence, the end day of Job B is 179.
End day of Job C:
Start day of Job C is the next day of the end day of Job B. End day is calculated by adding the start day with the value attained by subtracting 1 from the duration. Hence, the end day of Job C is 189.
End day of Job D:
Start day of Job D is the next day of the end day of Job C. End day is calculated by adding the start day with the value attained by subtracting 1 from the duration. Hence, the end day of Job D is 205.
End day of Job E:
Start day of Job E is the next day of the end day of Job D. End day is calculated by adding the start day with the value attained by subtracting 1 from the duration. Hence, the end day of Job E is 223.
Lateness of Job A, Job B, and Job D:
End day of Job A, Job B, and Job D is less than its respective due date. Hence, there would be no lateness.
Lateness of Job C:
It is calculated by subtracting the end day of the job from the due date of the project. Hence, the lateness of Job C is 14.
Lateness of Job E:
It is calculated by subtracting the end day of the job from the due date of the project. Hence, the lateness of Job E is 13.
b)
To determine: Sequence of jobs based on decision rule Earliest Due Date (EDD).
Introduction: Earliest Due Date is the scheduling rule, which helps to arrange the sequence in the order. Here, the job with the earliest due date would be served first. Then, the process would be going on from the earliest due date to the latest due date.
b)

Answer to Problem 19P
The sequence is C-A-B-E-D.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
The following information has been given:
Job | Date order received | Production days needed | Due date |
A | 110 | 20 | 180 |
B | 120 | 30 | 200 |
C | 122 | 10 | 175 |
D | 125 | 16 | 230 |
E | 130 | 18 | 210 |
All the jobs are arrived on day 130.
Determine the sequence of the job using EDD:
Job sequence | Processing time | Flow time | Due date | Start day | End day | Lateness |
C | 10 | 10 | 175 | 130 | 139 | |
A | 20 | 30 | 180 | 140 | 159 | |
B | 30 | 60 | 200 | 160 | 189 | |
E | 18 | 78 | 210 | 190 | 207 | |
D | 16 | 94 | 230 | 208 | 223 | |
Total | 94 | 272 |
Working note:
Duration and due date for the jobs have been given. Flow time is the cumulative value of the duration. Jobs arrival rate is given as 130. The job should be arranged based on due date. Due date should be assembled in the ascending order.
End day of Job C:
Jobs arrival rate is given as 130. End day is calculated by adding the start day with the value attained by subtracting 1 from the duration. Hence, the end day of Job C is 139.
End day of Job A:
Start day of Job A is the next day of the end day of Job C. End day is calculated by adding the start day with the value attained by subtracting 1 from the duration. Hence, the end day of Job A is 159.
End day of Job B:
Start day of Job B is the next day of the end day of Job A. End day is calculated by adding the start day with the value attained by subtracting 1 from the duration. Hence, the end day of Job B is 189.
End day of Job E:
Start day of Job E is the next day of the end day of Job B. End day is calculated by adding the start day with the value attained by subtracting 1 from the duration. Hence, the end day of Job E is 207.
End day of Job D:
Start day of Job D is the next day of the end day of Job E. End day is calculated by adding the start day with the value attained by subtracting 1 from the duration. Hence, the end day of Job D is 223.
Lateness of Job A, Job B, Job C, Job D, and Job E:
End day of all the jobs is less than its respective due date. Hence, there would be no lateness.
c)
To determine: Sequence of jobs based on decision rule Shortest Processing Time (SPT).
Introduction: Shortest Processing Tine is the scheduling rule which helps to arrange the sequence in the order. Here, the job with the shortest duration would be served first. Then, the process would be going on from shortest to largest duration.
c)

Answer to Problem 19P
The sequence is C-D-E-A-B.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
The following information has been given:
Job | Date order received | Production days needed | Due date |
A | 110 | 20 | 180 |
B | 120 | 30 | 200 |
C | 122 | 10 | 175 |
D | 125 | 16 | 230 |
E | 130 | 18 | 210 |
All the jobs are arrived on day 130.
Determine the sequence of the job using SPT:
Job sequence | Processing time | Flow time | Due date | Start day | End day | Lateness |
C | 10 | 10 | 175 | 130 | 139 | |
D | 16 | 26 | 230 | 140 | 155 | |
E | 18 | 44 | 210 | 156 | 173 | |
A | 20 | 64 | 180 | 174 | 193 | 13 |
B | 30 | 94 | 200 | 194 | 223 | 23 |
Total | 94 | 238 | 36 |
Working note:
Duration and due date for the jobs has been given. Flow time is the cumulative value of the duration. Jobs arrival rate is given as 130. The job should be arranged based on the duration (processing time). The duration should be assembled in the ascending order.
End day of Job C:
Jobs arrival rate is given as 130. End day is calculated by adding the start day with the value attained by subtracting 1 from the duration. Hence, the end day of Job C is 139.
End day of Job D:
Start day of Job D is the next day of the end day of Job C. End day is calculated by adding the start day with the value attained by subtracting 1 from the duration. Hence, the end day of Job D is 155.
End day of Job E:
Start day of Job E is the next day of the end day of Job D. End day is calculated by adding the start day with the value attained by subtracting 1 from the duration. Hence, the end day of Job E is 173.
End day of Job A:
Start day of Job A is the next day of the end day of Job E. End day is calculated by adding the start day with the value attained by subtracting 1 from the duration. Hence, the end day of Job A is 193.
End day of Job B:
Start day of Job B is the next day of the end day of Job A. End day is calculated by adding the start day with the value attained by subtracting 1 from the duration. Hence, the end day of Job B is 223.
Lateness of Job C, Job D, and Job E:
End day of Job C, Job D, and Job E are less than its respective due date. Hence, there would be no lateness.
Lateness of Job A:
It is calculated by subtracting the end day of the job from the due date of the project. Hence, the lateness of Job A is 13.
Lateness of Job B:
It is calculated by subtracting the end day of the job from the due date of the project. Hence, the lateness of Job B is 23.
d)
To determine: Sequence of jobs based on decision rule Longest Processing Time (LPT).
Introduction: Largest Processing Tine is the scheduling rule, which helps to arrange the sequence in the order. Here, the job with the largest duration would be served first. Then, the process would be going on from largest to shortest duration.
d)

Answer to Problem 19P
The sequence is B-A-E-D-C.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
The following information has been given:
Job | Date order received | Production days needed | Due date |
A | 110 | 20 | 180 |
B | 120 | 30 | 200 |
C | 122 | 10 | 175 |
D | 125 | 16 | 230 |
E | 130 | 18 | 210 |
All the jobs are arrived on day 130.
Determine the sequence of the job using LPT:
Job sequence | Processing time | Flow time | Due date | Start day | End day | Lateness |
B | 30 | 30 | 200 | 130 | 159 | |
A | 20 | 50 | 180 | 160 | 179 | |
E | 18 | 68 | 210 | 180 | 197 | |
D | 16 | 84 | 230 | 198 | 213 | |
C | 10 | 94 | 175 | 214 | 223 | 48 |
Total | 94 | 326 | 48 |
Working note:
Duration and due date for the jobs have been given. Flow time is the cumulative value of the duration. Jobs arrival rate is given as 130. The job should be arranged based on the duration (processing time). The duration should be assembled in the descending order
End day of Job B:
Jobs arrival rate is given as 130. End day is calculated by adding the start day with the value attained by subtracting 1 from the duration. Hence, the end day of Job B is 159.
End day of Job A:
Start day of Job A is the next day of the end day of Job B. End day is calculated by adding the start day with the value attained by subtracting 1 from the duration. Hence, the end day of Job A is 179.
End day of Job E:
Start day of Job E is the next day of the end day of Job A. End day is calculated by adding the start day with the value attained by subtracting 1 from the duration. Hence, the end day of Job E is 197.
End day of Job D:
Start day of Job D is the next day of the end day of Job E. End day is calculated by adding the start day with the value attained by subtracting 1 from the duration. Hence, the end day of Job D is 213.
End day of Job C:
Start day of Job C is the next day of the end day of Job D. End day is calculated by adding the start day with the value attained by subtracting 1 from the duration. Hence, the end day of Job C is 223.
Lateness of Job B, Job A, Job E, and Job D:
End day of Job B, Job A, Job E, and Job D are less than its respective due date. Hence, there would be no lateness.
Lateness of Job C:
It is calculated by subtracting the end day of the job from the due date of the project. Hence, the lateness of Job C is 48.
Summary:
Scheduling rule | Average lateness | Average flow time | Average number of jobs in system |
FCFS | 5.4 | 60.0 | 3.2 |
EDD | 0.0 | 54.4 | 2.9 |
SPT | 7.2 | 47.6 | 2.5 |
LPT | 9.6 | 65.2 | 3.5 |
First Come First Served (FCFS):
Average tardiness:
It is calculated by dividing the total lateness with the number of jobs. Hence, the average tardiness is 5.4.
Average flow time:
It is calculated by dividing the total flow time with the number of jobs. Hence, the average flow time is 60.
Average number of jobs in the system:
It is calculated by dividing the total flow time with total duration of all the jobs. Hence, the average number of jobs in the system is 3.2.
Earliest Due Date (EDD):
Average tardiness:
It is calculated by dividing the total lateness with the number of jobs. Hence, the average tardiness is 0.0.
Average flow time:
It is calculated by dividing the total flow time with the number of jobs. Hence, the average flow time is 54.4.
Average number of jobs in the system:
It is calculated by dividing the total flow time with total duration of all the jobs. Hence, the average number of jobs in the system is 2.9.
Shortest Processing Time (SPT):
Average tardiness:
It is calculated by dividing the total lateness with the number of jobs. Hence, the average tardiness is 7.2.
Average flow time:
It is calculated by dividing the total flow time with the number of jobs. Hence, the average flow time is 47.6.
Average number of jobs in the system:
It is calculated by dividing the total flow time with total duration of all the jobs. Hence, the average number of jobs in the system is 2.5.
Longest Processing Time (LPT):
Average tardiness:
It is calculated by dividing the total lateness with the number of jobs. Hence, the average tardiness is 9.6.
Average flow time:
It is calculated by dividing the total flow time with the number of jobs. Hence, the average flow time is 65.2.
Average number of jobs in the system:
It is calculated by dividing the total flow time with total duration of all the jobs. Hence, the average number of jobs in the system is 3.55.
Hence, Earliest Due Date is the best method for the average lateness. Shortest processing time has the minimum average flow time and average number of jobs in systems.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 15 Solutions
EBK PRINCIPLES OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
- Do you feel there is anything positive about rework?arrow_forwardDo you think technology can achieve faster setup times? How would it be implemented in the hospital workforce?arrow_forwardIn your experience or opinion, do you think process changes like organizing workspaces make a bigger difference, or is investing in technology usually the better solution for faster setups?arrow_forward
- Have you seen rework done in your business, and what was done to prevent that from occurring again?arrow_forwardResearch a company different than case studies examined and search the internet and find an example of a business that had to rework a process. How was the organization affected to rework a process in order to restore a good flow unit? Did rework hurt a process or improve the organization's operational efficiency? • Note: Include a reference with supportive citations in the discussion reply in your post.arrow_forwardSetup time is very important in affecting a process and the capacity of a process. How do you reduce setup time? Give examples of reducing setup time. Please Provide a referenecearrow_forward
- Do you think TPS was successful? If so, how? Are there other companies that have used TPS? If so, give examples. Please provide a referencearrow_forwardGiven the significant impact on finances, production timelines, and even equipment functionality, as you pointed out, what do you believe is the most effective single strategy a company can implement to significantly reduce the occurrence of rework within their operations?arrow_forwardDurban woman, Nombulelo Mkumla, took to social media last week to share how she discovered the rodent.In a lengthy Facebook post, she said she purchased the loaf of bread from a local shop after work on August 27.For the next days, Mkumla proceeded to use slices of bread from the load to make toast."Then, on the morning of August 31, I took the bread out of the fridge to make toast and noticed something disgusting andscary. I took a picture and sent it to my friends, and one of them said, 'Yi mpuku leyo tshomi' [That's a rat friend]“."I was in denial and suggested it might be something else, but the rat scenario made sense - it's possible the rat got into thebread at the factory, and no one noticed," Mkumla said.She went back to the shop she'd bought the bread from and was told to lay a complaint directly with the supplier.She sent an email with a video and photographs of the bread.Mkumla said she was later contacted by a man from Sasko who apologised for the incident.According to…arrow_forward
- PepsiCo South Africa says the incident where a woman discovered part of a rodent in her loaf of bread, is anisolated occurrence.Durban woman, Nombulelo Mkumla, took to social media last week to share how she discovered the rodent.In a lengthy Facebook post, she said she purchased the loaf of bread from a local shop after work on August 27.For the next days, Mkumla proceeded to use slices of bread from the load to make toast."Then, on the morning of August 31, I took the bread out of the fridge to make toast and noticed something disgusting andscary. I took a picture and sent it to my friends, and one of them said, 'Yi mpuku leyo tshomi' [That's a rat friend]“."I was in denial and suggested it might be something else, but the rat scenario made sense - it's possible the rat got into thebread at the factory, and no one noticed," Mkumla said.She went back to the shop she'd bought the bread from and was told to lay a complaint directly with the supplier.She sent an email with a video and…arrow_forwardDurban woman, Nombulelo Mkumla, took to social media last week to share how she discovered the rodent.In a lengthy Facebook post, she said she purchased the loaf of bread from a local shop after work on August 27.For the next days, Mkumla proceeded to use slices of bread from the load to make toast."Then, on the morning of August 31, I took the bread out of the fridge to make toast and noticed something disgusting andscary. I took a picture and sent it to my friends, and one of them said, 'Yi mpuku leyo tshomi' [That's a rat friend]“."I was in denial and suggested it might be something else, but the rat scenario made sense - it's possible the rat got into thebread at the factory, and no one noticed," Mkumla said.She went back to the shop she'd bought the bread from and was told to lay a complaint directly with the supplier.She sent an email with a video and photographs of the bread.Mkumla said she was later contacted by a man from Sasko who apologised for the incident.According to…arrow_forwardRead the project statement and answer ALL of the questions that follow PROJECT STATEMENT The African Integrated High-Speed Railway Network (AIHSRN). African nations are preparing to invest billions in a significant overhaul of their rail infrastructure as part of an ambitious plan for the continent. One of the key projects underway is the African Integrated High-Speed Railway Network (AIHSRN), which aims to connect Africa's capital cities and major commercial centres with a high-speed railway network to enhance continental trade and competition. This network will span 2,000 km (1,243 miles) and connect 60 cities, including Nairobi, Lagos, Cairo, and Dakar. It will improve access to essential markets, enhance economic cooperation, and encourage regional collaboration. The plan is poised to revolutionise intra-African trade by reducing travel times and lowering transportation costs, making trade between African nations more competitive. The trains will be capable of reaching speeds of up…arrow_forward
- Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,Foundations of Business (MindTap Course List)MarketingISBN:9781337386920Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. KapoorPublisher:Cengage LearningFoundations of Business - Standalone book (MindTa...MarketingISBN:9781285193946Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. KapoorPublisher:Cengage Learning


