(a)
To determine: The magnitude of the relative acceleration as a function of
(a)
Answer to Problem 76AP
Answer: The magnitude of the relative acceleration as a function of
Explanation of Solution
Explanation:
Given information:
A object of mass
Figure I
Formula to calculate the relative acceleration is,
Formula to calculate the gravitational force exerted by the object on the Earth is,
By Newton’s law the force exerted by the object is,
From equation (II) and equation (III) is,
The forces
Substitute
By Newton’s law the force exerted by the Earth is,
From equation (IV) and equation (V) is,
Substitute
Substitute
Conclusion:
Therefore, the magnitude of the relative acceleration as a function of
(b)
To determine: The magnitude of the relative acceleration for
(b)
Answer to Problem 76AP
Answer: The magnitude of the relative acceleration for
Explanation of Solution
Explanation:
Given information:
A object of mass
From equation (VI) the relative acceleration is,
Substitute
Conclusion:
Therefore, the magnitude of the relative acceleration for
(c)
To determine: The magnitude of the relative acceleration for
(c)
Answer to Problem 76AP
Answer: The magnitude of the relative acceleration for
Explanation of Solution
Explanation:
Given information:
A object of mass
From equation (VI) the relative acceleration is,
Substitute
Conclusion:
Therefore, the magnitude of the relative acceleration for
(d)
To determine: The magnitude of the relative acceleration for
(d)
Answer to Problem 76AP
Answer: The magnitude of the relative acceleration for
Explanation of Solution
Explanation:
Given information:
A object of mass
From equation (VI) the relative acceleration is,
Substitute
Conclusion:
Therefore, the magnitude of the relative acceleration for
(e)
To determine: The pattern of variation of relative acceleration with
(e)
Answer to Problem 76AP
Answer: The relative acceleration is directly proportional to the mass
Explanation of Solution
Explanation:
Given information:
A object of mass
From equation (VI) the relative acceleration is,
This is the linear equation and shows the relative acceleration is directly proportional to the object having mass
Conclusion:
Therefore, the relative acceleration is directly proportional to the object having mass
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 13 Solutions
Bundle: Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern Physics, Loose-leaf Version, 9th + WebAssign Printed Access Card, Multi-Term
- (a) Imagine that a space probe could be fired as a projectile from the Earth's surface with an initial speed of 5.96 x 10“ m/s relative to the Sun. What would its speed be when it is very far from the Earth (in m/s)? Ignore atmospheric friction, the effects of other planets, and the rotation of the Earth. (Consider the mass of the Sun in your calculations.) 354790 Your response differs from the correct answer by more than 100%. m/s (b) What If? The speed provided in part (a) is very difficult to achieve technologically. Often, Jupiter is used as a "gravitational slingshot" to increase the speed of a probe to the escape speed from the solar system, which is 1.85 x 10“ m/s from a point on Jupiter's orbit around the Sun (if Jupiter is not nearby). If the probe is launched from the Earth's surface at a speed of 4.10 × 10“ m/s relative to the Sun, what is the increase in speed needed from the gravitational slingshot at Jupiter for the space probe to escape the solar system (in m/s)? (Assume…arrow_forward(a) Imagine that a space probe could be fired as a projectile from the Earth's surface with an initial speed of 5.48 x 10 m/s relative to the Sun. What would its speed be when it is very far from the Earth (in m/s)? Ignore atmospheric friction, the effects of other planets, and the rotation of the Earth. (Consider the mass of the Sun in your calculations.) Your response differs from the correct answer by more than 10%. Double check your calculations. m/s (b) What If? The speed provided in part (a) is very difficult to achieve technologically. Often, Jupiter is used as a "gravitational slingshot" to increase the speed of a probe to the escape speed from the solar system, which is 1.85 x 10 m/s from a point on Jupiter's orbit around the Sun (if Jupiter is not nearby). If the probe is launched from the Earth's surface at a speed of 4.10 x 10 m/s relative to the Sun, what is the increase in speed needed from the gravitational slingshot at Jupiter for the space probe to escape the solar…arrow_forwardThe inertial mass of a particle is, by definition, the mass that appears in Newton's second law. Consider free fall of a particle with gravitational mass mº and inertial mass m' near the surface of a homogeneous planet having gravitational mass MC and radius R. Express the gravitational acceleration a of the particle in terms of these quantities. (Neglect any frictional forces.)arrow_forward
- Two manned satellites approaching one another at a relative speed of 0.100 m/s intend to dock. The first has a mass of 4.00 ✕ 103 kg, and the second a mass of 7.50 ✕ 103 kg. Assume that the positive direction is directed from the second satellite towards the first satellite.(a) Calculate the final velocity after docking, in the frame of reference in which the first satellite was originally at rest. m/s(b) What is the loss of kinetic energy in this inelastic collision? J(c) Repeat both parts, in the frame of reference in which the second satellite was originally at rest.final velocity m/sloss of kinetic energy JExplain why the change in velocity is different in the two frames, whereas the change in kinetic energy is the same in both.arrow_forwardTwo manned satellites approaching one another at a relative speed of 0.250 m/s intend to dock. The first has a mass of 2.00 ✕ 103 kg, and the second a mass of 7.50 ✕ 103 kg. Assume that the positive direction is directed from the second satellite towards the first satellite.(a) Calculate the final velocity after docking, in the frame of reference in which the first satellite was originally at rest.m/s(b) What is the loss of kinetic energy in this inelastic collision?J(c) Repeat both parts, in the frame of reference in which the second satellite was originally at rest.final velocitym/sloss of kinetic energyJExplain why the change in velocity is different in the two frames, whereas the change in kinetic energy is the same in both. (Do this on paper. Your instructor may ask you to turn in this work.)arrow_forwardTwo manned satellites approaching one another at a relative speed of 0.450 m/s intend to dock. The first has a mass of 3.00 ✕ 103 kg, and the second a mass of 7.50 ✕ 103 kg. Assume that the positive direction is directed from the second satellite towards the first satellite. (a) Calculate the final velocity after docking, in the frame of reference in which the first satellite was originally at rest. m/s(b) What is the loss of kinetic energy in this inelastic collision? J(c) Repeat both parts, in the frame of reference in which the second satellite was originally at rest. final velocity (m/s) loss of kinetic energy (J)arrow_forward
- Two manned satellites approaching one another at a relative speed of 0.100 m/s intend to dock. The first has a mass of 5.00 ✕ 103 kg, and the second a mass of 7.50 ✕ 103 kg. Assume that the positive direction is directed from the second satellite towards the first satellite. (a) Calculate the final velocity after docking, in the frame of reference in which the first satellite was originally at rest.m/s(b) What is the loss of kinetic energy in this inelastic collision?J(c) Repeat both parts, in the frame of reference in which the second satellite was originally at rest.final velocitym/sloss of kinetic energyJarrow_forwardTwo manned satellites approaching one another at a relative speed of 0.150 m/s intend to dock. The first has a mass of 5.00 ✕ 103 kg, and the second a mass of 7.50 ✕ 103 kg. Assume that the positive direction is directed from the second satellite towards the first satellite. (a) Calculate the final velocity after docking, in the frame of reference in which the first satellite was originally at rest. (b) What is the loss of kinetic energy in this inelastic collision? (c) Repeat both parts, in the frame of reference in which the second satellite was originally at rest.final velocity:loss of kinetic energy:arrow_forwardTwo manned satellites approaching one another at a relative speed of 0.150 m/s intend to dock. The first has a mass of 5.00 ✕ 103 kg, and the second a mass of 7.50 ✕ 103 kg. Assume that the positive direction is directed from the second satellite towards the first satellite. (a) Calculate the final velocity after docking, in the frame of reference in which the first satellite was originally at rest. (b) What is the loss of kinetic energy in this inelastic collision? J(c) Repeat both parts, in the frame of reference in which the second satellite was originally at rest.final velocity:loss of kinetic energy:Explain why the change in velocity is different in the two frames, whereas the change in kinetic energy is the same in both. (Do this on paper. Your instructor may ask you to turn in this work.)arrow_forward
- Two manned satellites approaching one another at a relative speed of 0.550 m/s intend to dock. The first has a mass of 4.00 ✕ 103 kg, and the second a mass of 7.50 ✕ 103 kg. Assume that the positive direction is directed from the second satellite towards the first satellite.(a) Calculate the final velocity after docking, in the frame of reference in which the first satellite was originally at rest. m/s(b) What is the loss of kinetic energy in this inelastic collision? J(c) Repeat both parts, in the frame of reference in which the second satellite was originally at rest.final velocity __________ m/sloss of kinetic energy _____________ Jarrow_forwardTwo manned satellites approaching one another at a relative speed of 0.150 m/s intend to dock. The first has a mass of 4.00 ✕ 103 kg, and the second a mass of 7.50 ✕ 103 kg. Assume that the positive direction is directed from the second satellite towards the first satellite. (a) Calculate the final velocity after docking, in the frame of reference in which the first satellite was originally at rest. (b) What is the loss of kinetic energy in this inelastic collision? (c) Repeat both parts, in the frame of reference in which the second satellite was originally at rest.final velocity: loss of kinetic energy:arrow_forwardTwo manned satellites approaching one another at a relative speed of 0.350 m/s intend to dock. The first has a mass of 3.50 ✕ 103 kg, and the second a mass of 7.50 ✕ 103 kg. Assume that the positive direction is directed from the second satellite towards the first satellite. (a) Calculate the final velocity after docking, in the frame of reference in which the first satellite was originally at rest. m/s(b) What is the loss of kinetic energy in this inelastic collision? J(c) Repeat both parts, in the frame of reference in which the second satellite was originally at rest.final velocity m/s loss of kinetic energy JExplain why the change in velocity is different in the two frames, whereas the change in kinetic energy is the same in both.arrow_forward
- Classical Dynamics of Particles and SystemsPhysicsISBN:9780534408961Author:Stephen T. Thornton, Jerry B. MarionPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Physics: A Calculus-Based TextPhysicsISBN:9781133104261Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage LearningGlencoe Physics: Principles and Problems, Student...PhysicsISBN:9780078807213Author:Paul W. ZitzewitzPublisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill