Introduction Inductive reasoning involves arriving at general conclusions based on specific observations and past experiences. This type of reasoning, using past experiences to predict future consequences, is used frequently by people in their daily lives.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 13.1-1TY

Summary Introduction

Introduction

Inductive reasoning involves arriving at general conclusions based on specific observations and past experiences. This type of reasoning, using past experiences to predict future consequences, is used frequently by people in their daily lives.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Answer and explanation

The process of arriving at a general conclusion on the basis of specific evidence and observations is known as inductive reasoning. The conclusions are based on prior experiences and one’s observations. However, these conclusions, reached on the basis of inductive arguments, are not always true. Whether a conclusion seems plausible or not is determined by the strength of the inductive argument, which is further influenced by a variety of factors:

1. Representativeness of observations: This refers to the extent to which the argument applies and represents all the members of a category. Arguments that are more representative of the category are stronger than those that take only certain members of the category into account.

2. Number of observations: The number of cases on which the argument is based also influences its strength. The larger the number of cases examined to build an argument, the stronger will be the argument.

3. Quality of observations: Lastly, the quality of the observations or evidence also impacts the strength of the argument, such that the arguments based on scientific and reliable sources and evidence are generally more convincing.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Freud’s theory a. introduced and emphasized the concept of free will into the study of child development. b. has influenced our ideas about when and how to toilet train children. c. has had little impact on modern thought and is not used today. d. was praised for being based primarily on adult’s recollections of their childhoods.

According to Erikson, early experiences a. are determined by internal struggles and unconscious urges. b. have no impact on later development. c. only predict future development once we reach 6–8 years of age. d. exert a continued influence on later development.

According to Freud, the psychic structure called ego a. is biologically based and present at birth. b. is our moral base that forces us to follow rules. c. is driven by a quest for pleasure. d. helps the id get gratified in a socially appropriate way.

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 13.1-1TY

Summary Introduction

Introduction

Inductive reasoning involves arriving at general conclusions based on specific observations and past experiences. This type of reasoning, using past experiences to predict future consequences, is used frequently by people in their daily lives.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Answer and explanation

The process of arriving at a general conclusion on the basis of specific evidence and observations is known as inductive reasoning. The conclusions are based on prior experiences and one’s observations. However, these conclusions, reached on the basis of inductive arguments, are not always true. Whether a conclusion seems plausible or not is determined by the strength of the inductive argument, which is further influenced by a variety of factors:

1. Representativeness of observations: This refers to the extent to which the argument applies and represents all the members of a category. Arguments that are more representative of the category are stronger than those that take only certain members of the category into account.

2. Number of observations: The number of cases on which the argument is based also influences its strength. The larger the number of cases examined to build an argument, the stronger will be the argument.

3. Quality of observations: Lastly, the quality of the observations or evidence also impacts the strength of the argument, such that the arguments based on scientific and reliable sources and evidence are generally more convincing.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 13.1-1TY

Summary Introduction

Introduction

Inductive reasoning involves arriving at general conclusions based on specific observations and past experiences. This type of reasoning, using past experiences to predict future consequences, is used frequently by people in their daily lives.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Answer and explanation

The process of arriving at a general conclusion on the basis of specific evidence and observations is known as inductive reasoning. The conclusions are based on prior experiences and one’s observations. However, these conclusions, reached on the basis of inductive arguments, are not always true. Whether a conclusion seems plausible or not is determined by the strength of the inductive argument, which is further influenced by a variety of factors:

1. Representativeness of observations: This refers to the extent to which the argument applies and represents all the members of a category. Arguments that are more representative of the category are stronger than those that take only certain members of the category into account.

2. Number of observations: The number of cases on which the argument is based also influences its strength. The larger the number of cases examined to build an argument, the stronger will be the argument.

3. Quality of observations: Lastly, the quality of the observations or evidence also impacts the strength of the argument, such that the arguments based on scientific and reliable sources and evidence are generally more convincing.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 13.1-1TY

Summary Introduction

Introduction

Inductive reasoning involves arriving at general conclusions based on specific observations and past experiences. This type of reasoning, using past experiences to predict future consequences, is used frequently by people in their daily lives.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Answer and explanation

The process of arriving at a general conclusion on the basis of specific evidence and observations is known as inductive reasoning. The conclusions are based on prior experiences and one’s observations. However, these conclusions, reached on the basis of inductive arguments, are not always true. Whether a conclusion seems plausible or not is determined by the strength of the inductive argument, which is further influenced by a variety of factors:

1. Representativeness of observations: This refers to the extent to which the argument applies and represents all the members of a category. Arguments that are more representative of the category are stronger than those that take only certain members of the category into account.

2. Number of observations: The number of cases on which the argument is based also influences its strength. The larger the number of cases examined to build an argument, the stronger will be the argument.

3. Quality of observations: Lastly, the quality of the observations or evidence also impacts the strength of the argument, such that the arguments based on scientific and reliable sources and evidence are generally more convincing.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 13, Problem 13.1-1TY

Summary Introduction

Introduction

Inductive reasoning involves arriving at general conclusions based on specific observations and past experiences. This type of reasoning, using past experiences to predict future consequences, is used frequently by people in their daily lives.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Answer and explanation

The process of arriving at a general conclusion on the basis of specific evidence and observations is known as inductive reasoning. The conclusions are based on prior experiences and one’s observations. However, these conclusions, reached on the basis of inductive arguments, are not always true. Whether a conclusion seems plausible or not is determined by the strength of the inductive argument, which is further influenced by a variety of factors:

1. Representativeness of observations: This refers to the extent to which the argument applies and represents all the members of a category. Arguments that are more representative of the category are stronger than those that take only certain members of the category into account.

2. Number of observations: The number of cases on which the argument is based also influences its strength. The larger the number of cases examined to build an argument, the stronger will be the argument.

3. Quality of observations: Lastly, the quality of the observations or evidence also impacts the strength of the argument, such that the arguments based on scientific and reliable sources and evidence are generally more convincing.

Answer 6

Chapter 13, Problem 13.1-1TY

Summary Introduction

Introduction

Inductive reasoning involves arriving at general conclusions based on specific observations and past experiences. This type of reasoning, using past experiences to predict future consequences, is used frequently by people in their daily lives.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Answer and explanation

The process of arriving at a general conclusion on the basis of specific evidence and observations is known as inductive reasoning. The conclusions are based on prior experiences and one’s observations. However, these conclusions, reached on the basis of inductive arguments, are not always true. Whether a conclusion seems plausible or not is determined by the strength of the inductive argument, which is further influenced by a variety of factors:

1. Representativeness of observations: This refers to the extent to which the argument applies and represents all the members of a category. Arguments that are more representative of the category are stronger than those that take only certain members of the category into account.

2. Number of observations: The number of cases on which the argument is based also influences its strength. The larger the number of cases examined to build an argument, the stronger will be the argument.

3. Quality of observations: Lastly, the quality of the observations or evidence also impacts the strength of the argument, such that the arguments based on scientific and reliable sources and evidence are generally more convincing.

Answer 7

Chapter 13, Problem 13.1-1TY

Summary Introduction

Introduction

Inductive reasoning involves arriving at general conclusions based on specific observations and past experiences. This type of reasoning, using past experiences to predict future consequences, is used frequently by people in their daily lives.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Answer and explanation

The process of arriving at a general conclusion on the basis of specific evidence and observations is known as inductive reasoning. The conclusions are based on prior experiences and one’s observations. However, these conclusions, reached on the basis of inductive arguments, are not always true. Whether a conclusion seems plausible or not is determined by the strength of the inductive argument, which is further influenced by a variety of factors:

1. Representativeness of observations: This refers to the extent to which the argument applies and represents all the members of a category. Arguments that are more representative of the category are stronger than those that take only certain members of the category into account.

2. Number of observations: The number of cases on which the argument is based also influences its strength. The larger the number of cases examined to build an argument, the stronger will be the argument.

3. Quality of observations: Lastly, the quality of the observations or evidence also impacts the strength of the argument, such that the arguments based on scientific and reliable sources and evidence are generally more convincing.