
a.
Test whether the proportions falling into each of the two response categories for males and females are same or not.
a.

Answer to Problem 21E
There is no convincing evidence that the proportions falling into each of the two response categories for males and females are not the same.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The given table represents the classification of male and female students according to their response about whether they usually eat three meals a day or rarely eat three meals a day.
In order to test whether the proportions falling into each of the two response categories for males and females are same or not, the appropriate test is
The steps in chi-square test for homogeneity are as follows:
The null and alternative hypotheses are as follows:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
Level of significance:
Assumptions:
- It is given that data are resulted from classifying each person in a random sample of male and female students at a particular college.
- The expected cell counts are calculated as shown below:
Usually eat 3 meals a day | Rarely eat 3 meals a day | Total | |
Male | 48 | ||
Female | 91 | ||
Total | 63 | 76 | 139 |
From the expected cell counts table, it is observed that all the expected counts are greater than 5.
Test statistic:
Chi-square statistic:
Degrees of freedom:
Here, the number of rows is 2 and the number of columns is 2. The degrees of freedom is calculated as follows:
From the calculations,
P-value:
From Appendix A: Table 8-Upper-Tail Areas for Chi-Square Distributions, the right-tailed area is greater than 0.100 for the chi-squared values that are less than 2.70.
Thus, P-value > 0.100.
Decision rule:
- If P-value is less than or equal to the level of significance, reject the null hypothesis.
- Otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Here, the level of significance is 0.05.
Here, P-value is greater than the level of significance.
That is,
Hence, fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore, there is no convincing evidence that the proportions falling into each of the two response categories for males and females are not the same.
b.
Check whether the calculations and conclusions from Part (a) are consistent with the accompanying Minitab output.
b.

Explanation of Solution
From Part (a), the chi-square value obtained is
In the given MINITAB output, the chi-square value is 2.314 and the P-value is 0.128.
Since
Hence, the calculations and conclusions from Part (a) are consistent with the accompanying MINITAB output.
c.
Check whether the two-sample z test would lead to the same conclusion as in Part (a).
c.

Answer to Problem 21E
The two-sample z test leads to the same conclusion as in Part (a).
Explanation of Solution
From the given output, the test for two proportions is
Conclusion:
Here, the level of significance is 0.05.
Here, P-value is greater than the level of significance.
That is,
Hence, fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore, there is no convincing evidence that the proportions falling in the two response categories are not the same for males and females.
Thus, the two-sample z test leads to the same conclusion as in Part (a).
d.
Compare the P-values from the tests in Parts (a) and (c).
d.

Explanation of Solution
The P-value obtained in Part (a) is greater than 0.100, which is not an exact P-value, but a range for the P-value.
The P-value obtained in Part (c) is 0.127.
Both the P-values are greater than 0.100.
This is not surprising as both the chi-square statistic and the z-statistic measure the probability of getting sample proportions that are far from the expected proportions under null hypothesis.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 12 Solutions
Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis
- I need help with this problem and an explanation of the solution for the image described below. (Statistics: Engineering Probabilities)arrow_forwardI need help with this problem and an explanation of the solution for the image described below. (Statistics: Engineering Probabilities)arrow_forwardI need help with this problem and an explanation of the solution for the image described below. (Statistics: Engineering Probabilities)arrow_forward
- I need help with this problem and an explanation of the solution for the image described below. (Statistics: Engineering Probabilities)arrow_forwardI need help with this problem and an explanation of the solution for the image described below. (Statistics: Engineering Probabilities)arrow_forward3. Consider the following regression model: Yi Bo+B1x1 + = ···· + ßpxip + Єi, i = 1, . . ., n, where are i.i.d. ~ N (0,0²). (i) Give the MLE of ẞ and σ², where ẞ = (Bo, B₁,..., Bp)T. (ii) Derive explicitly the expressions of AIC and BIC for the above linear regression model, based on their general formulae.arrow_forward
- How does the width of prediction intervals for ARMA(p,q) models change as the forecast horizon increases? Grows to infinity at a square root rate Depends on the model parameters Converges to a fixed value Grows to infinity at a linear ratearrow_forwardConsider the AR(3) model X₁ = 0.6Xt-1 − 0.4Xt-2 +0.1Xt-3. What is the value of the PACF at lag 2? 0.6 Not enough information None of these values 0.1 -0.4 이arrow_forwardSuppose you are gambling on a roulette wheel. Each time the wheel is spun, the result is one of the outcomes 0, 1, and so on through 36. Of these outcomes, 18 are red, 18 are black, and 1 is green. On each spin you bet $5 that a red outcome will occur and $1 that the green outcome will occur. If red occurs, you win a net $4. (You win $10 from red and nothing from green.) If green occurs, you win a net $24. (You win $30 from green and nothing from red.) If black occurs, you lose everything you bet for a loss of $6. a. Use simulation to generate 1,000 plays from this strategy. Each play should indicate the net amount won or lost. Then, based on these outcomes, calculate a 95% confidence interval for the total net amount won or lost from 1,000 plays of the game. (Round your answers to two decimal places and if your answer is negative value, enter "minus" sign.) I worked out the Upper Limit, but I can't seem to arrive at the correct answer for the Lower Limit. What is the Lower Limit?…arrow_forward
- Let us suppose we have some article reported on a study of potential sources of injury to equine veterinarians conducted at a university veterinary hospital. Forces on the hand were measured for several common activities that veterinarians engage in when examining or treating horses. We will consider the forces on the hands for two tasks, lifting and using ultrasound. Assume that both sample sizes are 6, the sample mean force for lifting was 6.2 pounds with standard deviation 1.5 pounds, and the sample mean force for using ultrasound was 6.4 pounds with standard deviation 0.3 pounds. Assume that the standard deviations are known. Suppose that you wanted to detect a true difference in mean force of 0.25 pounds on the hands for these two activities. Under the null hypothesis, 40 0. What level of type II error would you recommend here? = Round your answer to four decimal places (e.g. 98.7654). Use α = 0.05. β = 0.0594 What sample size would be required? Assume the sample sizes are to be…arrow_forwardConsider the hypothesis test Ho: 0 s² = = 4.5; s² = 2.3. Use a = 0.01. = σ against H₁: 6 > σ2. Suppose that the sample sizes are n₁ = 20 and 2 = 8, and that (a) Test the hypothesis. Round your answers to two decimal places (e.g. 98.76). The test statistic is fo = 1.96 The critical value is f = 6.18 Conclusion: fail to reject the null hypothesis at a = 0.01. (b) Construct the confidence interval on 02/2/622 which can be used to test the hypothesis: (Round your answer to two decimal places (e.g. 98.76).) 035arrow_forwardUsing the method of sections need help solving this please explain im stuckarrow_forward
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw HillHolt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition...AlgebraISBN:9780547587776Author:HOLT MCDOUGALPublisher:HOLT MCDOUGALCollege Algebra (MindTap Course List)AlgebraISBN:9781305652231Author:R. David Gustafson, Jeff HughesPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Functions and Change: A Modeling Approach to Coll...AlgebraISBN:9781337111348Author:Bruce Crauder, Benny Evans, Alan NoellPublisher:Cengage Learning




