
a.
Test whether fatal bicycle accidents are equally likely to occur in each of the 12-months at 0.01 significance level.
a.

Answer to Problem 10E
There is convincing evidence that fatal bicycle accidents are not equally likely to occur in each of the months.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The given data represent the classification of fatal bicycle accidents according to the month in which the accident occurred.
The expected counts are calculated as shown below:
Month | Observed counts | Expected counts |
January | 38 | |
February | 32 | |
March | 43 | |
April | 59 | |
May | 78 | |
June | 74 | |
July | 98 | |
August | 85 | |
September | 64 | |
October | 66 | |
November | 42 | |
December | 40 | |
719 | 719 |
The nine-step hypotheses testing procedure to test goodness-of-fit is given below:
1. Consider that the proportion of fatal bicycle accidents occurring in January is
2. Null hypothesis:
3. Alternative hypothesis:
4. Significance level:
5. Test statistic:
6. Assumptions:
- Assume that the 719 accidents included in the study is a random sample from the population of fatal bicycle accidents.
- From the table, it is observed that all the expected counts are greater than 5.
7. Calculation:
Software procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to obtain the test statistics and P-value using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Stat > Tables > Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test (One Variable).
- In Observed counts, enter the column of Number of Accidents.
- In Category names, enter the column of Month.
- Under Test, select the Equal Proportions.
- Click OK.
The output obtained using the MINITAB software is given below:
From the output,
8. P-value:
From the MINITAB output,
9. Conclusion:
Decision rule:
- If P-value is less than or equal to the level of significance, reject the null hypothesis.
- Otherwise, do not reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Here the level of significance is 0.01.
Here, P-value is less than the level of significance.
That is,
Hence, reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, there is convincing evidence that fatal bicycle accidents are not equally likely to occur in each of the months.
b.
Write the null and alternative hypotheses to determine if some months are riskier than others by taking differing month lengths into account.
b.

Explanation of Solution
The null hypothesis in Part (a) specifies that fatal accidents are equally likely to occur in any of the 12 months.
The year considered in the study is 2004, which is a leap year. It is known that a leap year contains 366 days, with 29 days in February.
The null and alternative hypotheses to determine if some months are riskier than others by taking differing month lengths and the characteristics of a leap year into account are as follows:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
c.
Test the hypotheses proposed in Part (b) at 0.05 significance level.
c.

Answer to Problem 10E
There is convincing evidence that fatal bicycle accidents do not occur in any of the twelve months in proportion to the lengths of the months.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The expected counts are calculated as shown below:
Month | Observed counts |
Proportion | Expected counts |
January | 38 | 0.085 | |
February | 32 | 0.079 | |
March | 43 | 0.085 | |
April | 59 | 0.082 | |
May | 78 | 0.085 | |
June | 74 | 0.082 | |
July | 98 | 0.085 | |
August | 85 | 0.085 | |
September | 64 | 0.082 | |
October | 66 | 0.085 | |
November | 42 | 0.082 | |
December | 40 | 0.085 | |
719 | 1 (approximately) | 719 |
Significance level:
Test statistic:
Assumptions:
- Assume that the 719 accidents included in the study is a random sample from the population of fatal bicycle accidents.
- From the table, it is observed that all the expected counts are greater than 5.
Calculation:
Software procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to obtain the test statistic and P-value using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Stat > Tables > Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test (One Variable).
- In Observed counts, enter the column of Number of Accidents.
- In Category names, enter the column of Month.
- Under Test, select the column of Proportion in Proportions specified by historical counts.
- Click OK.
The output obtained using the MINITAB software is given below:
From the output,
8. P-value:
From the MINITAB output,
9. Conclusion:
Decision rule:
- If P-value is less than or equal to the level of significance, reject the null hypothesis.
- Otherwise, do not reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Here the level of significance is 0.05.
Here, P-value is less than the level of significance.
That is,
Hence, reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore, there is convincing evidence that fatal bicycle accidents do not occur in any of the twelve months in proportion to the lengths of the months.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 12 Solutions
Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis
- I need help with this problem and an explanation of the solution for the image described below. (Statistics: Engineering Probabilities)arrow_forwardI need help with this problem and an explanation of the solution for the image described below. (Statistics: Engineering Probabilities)arrow_forward3. Consider the following regression model: Yi Bo+B1x1 + = ···· + ßpxip + Єi, i = 1, . . ., n, where are i.i.d. ~ N (0,0²). (i) Give the MLE of ẞ and σ², where ẞ = (Bo, B₁,..., Bp)T. (ii) Derive explicitly the expressions of AIC and BIC for the above linear regression model, based on their general formulae.arrow_forward
- How does the width of prediction intervals for ARMA(p,q) models change as the forecast horizon increases? Grows to infinity at a square root rate Depends on the model parameters Converges to a fixed value Grows to infinity at a linear ratearrow_forwardConsider the AR(3) model X₁ = 0.6Xt-1 − 0.4Xt-2 +0.1Xt-3. What is the value of the PACF at lag 2? 0.6 Not enough information None of these values 0.1 -0.4 이arrow_forwardSuppose you are gambling on a roulette wheel. Each time the wheel is spun, the result is one of the outcomes 0, 1, and so on through 36. Of these outcomes, 18 are red, 18 are black, and 1 is green. On each spin you bet $5 that a red outcome will occur and $1 that the green outcome will occur. If red occurs, you win a net $4. (You win $10 from red and nothing from green.) If green occurs, you win a net $24. (You win $30 from green and nothing from red.) If black occurs, you lose everything you bet for a loss of $6. a. Use simulation to generate 1,000 plays from this strategy. Each play should indicate the net amount won or lost. Then, based on these outcomes, calculate a 95% confidence interval for the total net amount won or lost from 1,000 plays of the game. (Round your answers to two decimal places and if your answer is negative value, enter "minus" sign.) I worked out the Upper Limit, but I can't seem to arrive at the correct answer for the Lower Limit. What is the Lower Limit?…arrow_forward
- Let us suppose we have some article reported on a study of potential sources of injury to equine veterinarians conducted at a university veterinary hospital. Forces on the hand were measured for several common activities that veterinarians engage in when examining or treating horses. We will consider the forces on the hands for two tasks, lifting and using ultrasound. Assume that both sample sizes are 6, the sample mean force for lifting was 6.2 pounds with standard deviation 1.5 pounds, and the sample mean force for using ultrasound was 6.4 pounds with standard deviation 0.3 pounds. Assume that the standard deviations are known. Suppose that you wanted to detect a true difference in mean force of 0.25 pounds on the hands for these two activities. Under the null hypothesis, 40 0. What level of type II error would you recommend here? = Round your answer to four decimal places (e.g. 98.7654). Use α = 0.05. β = 0.0594 What sample size would be required? Assume the sample sizes are to be…arrow_forwardConsider the hypothesis test Ho: 0 s² = = 4.5; s² = 2.3. Use a = 0.01. = σ against H₁: 6 > σ2. Suppose that the sample sizes are n₁ = 20 and 2 = 8, and that (a) Test the hypothesis. Round your answers to two decimal places (e.g. 98.76). The test statistic is fo = 1.96 The critical value is f = 6.18 Conclusion: fail to reject the null hypothesis at a = 0.01. (b) Construct the confidence interval on 02/2/622 which can be used to test the hypothesis: (Round your answer to two decimal places (e.g. 98.76).) 035arrow_forwardUsing the method of sections need help solving this please explain im stuckarrow_forward
- Please solve 6.31 by using the method of sections im stuck and need explanationarrow_forwarda) When two variables are correlated, can the researcher be sure that one variable causes the other? If YES , why? If NO , why? b) What is meant by the statement that two variables are related? Discuss.arrow_forwardSCIE 211 Lab 3: Graphing and DataWorksheetPre-lab Questions:1. When should you use each of the following types of graphs? Fill answers in the table below.Type of Graph Used to showLine graphScatter plotBar graphHistogramPie Chart2. Several ways in which we can be fooled or misled by a graph were identified in the Lab 3Introduction. Find two examples of misleading graphs on the Internet and paste them below. Besure to identify why each graph is misleading. Data Charts:Circumference vs. Diameter for circular objectsDiameter Can 1 (cm) Can 2 (cm) Can 3 (cm)Trial 1Trial 2Trial 3MeanCircumference Can 1 (cm) Can 2 (cm) Can 3 (cm)Trial 1Trial 2Trial 3MeanScatter Plot Graph – Circumference Vs. DiameterIdentify 2 points of the Trendline.Y1 = ________ Y2 = _________X1 = ________ X2 = _________Calculate the Slope of the Trendline = Post-lab Questions:1. Answer the questions below. You will need to use the following equation to answer…arrow_forward
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw HillHolt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition...AlgebraISBN:9780547587776Author:HOLT MCDOUGALPublisher:HOLT MCDOUGAL

