
Concept explainers
(a)
To explain how bias may have been introduced based on the way the questions were worded and suggest a way that they could have been worded differently in order to avoid this bias.
(a)

Explanation of Solution
It is given that in a recent poll, randomly selected New York State residents at various fast-food restaurants were asked if they supported or opposed a “fat tax” on non-diet sugared soda. Thirty-one percent said that they were in favor of such tax and sixty-six percent were opposed. But when asked if they would support such tax if the money raised were used to fund health care given the high incidence of obesity in United States, forty-eight percent said they were in favor and forty-nine percent were opposed. Thus, we can say that the first question was called a "fat tax" so people may have reacted negatively since they may have thought that this is a tax for overweight individuals. And the second question provides extra information that gets people thinking about the obesity epidemic in the US and the increased health care that could be provided as a benefit with the tax money. So, instead they should have asked "Would you support or oppose a tax on non-diet sugared soda?" in order to avoid biasness.
(b)
To explain how bias may have been introduced based on the way sample was taken and suggest a way that the sample could have been obtained in order to avoid this bias.
(b)

Explanation of Solution
It is given that in a recent poll, randomly selected New York State residents at various fast-food restaurants were asked if they supported or opposed a “fat tax” on non-diet sugared soda. Thirty-one percent said that they were in favor of such tax and sixty-six percent were opposed. But when asked if they would support such tax if the money raised were used to fund health care given the high incidence of obesity in United States, forty-eight percent said they were in favor and forty-nine percent were opposed. Thus, bias may have been introduced based on the way sample was taken because this method samples only people at fast-food restaurants. They may go to these restaurants because they like the drinks and would not any to pay a tax on their favorite beverages. It is likely that the proportion of those who would oppose a tax will be overestimated. Thus, instead they should have taken a random sample of all New York residents so that the sample could have been obtained in order to avoid this bias.
(c)
To identify a sampling method that would achieve this goal and briefly describe how the sample would be taken.
(c)

Answer to Problem 43PT4
We should use stratified sampling method.
Explanation of Solution
It is given that in a recent poll, randomly selected New York State residents at various fast-food restaurants were asked if they supported or opposed a “fat tax” on non-diet sugared soda. Thirty-one percent said that they were in favor of such tax and sixty-six percent were opposed. But when asked if they would support such tax if the money raised were used to fund health care given the high incidence of obesity in United States, forty-eight percent said they were in favor and forty-nine percent were opposed. Thus, to achieve this goal the sampling method we should use is stratified sampling method because in this the total population is divided into smaller groups or strata to complete the sampling process so in this case, each state is its own stratum.
Chapter 12 Solutions
The Practice of Statistics for AP - 4th Edition
Additional Math Textbook Solutions
Introductory Statistics
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th Edition)
Intro Stats, Books a la Carte Edition (5th Edition)
Calculus: Early Transcendentals (2nd Edition)
Elementary Statistics (13th Edition)
- Course Home ✓ Do Homework - Practice Ques ✓ My Uploads | bartleby + mylab.pearson.com/Student/PlayerHomework.aspx?homeworkId=688589738&questionId=5&flushed=false&cid=8110079¢erwin=yes Online SP 2025 STA 2023-009 Yin = Homework: Practice Questions Exam 3 Question list * Question 3 * Question 4 ○ Question 5 K Concluir atualização: Ava Pearl 04/02/25 9:28 AM HW Score: 71.11%, 12.09 of 17 points ○ Points: 0 of 1 Save Listed in the accompanying table are weights (kg) of randomly selected U.S. Army male personnel measured in 1988 (from "ANSUR I 1988") and different weights (kg) of randomly selected U.S. Army male personnel measured in 2012 (from "ANSUR II 2012"). Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations. Do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. Complete parts (a) and (b). Click the icon to view the ANSUR data. a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the mean weight of the 1988…arrow_forwardsolving problem 1arrow_forwardselect bmw stock. you can assume the price of the stockarrow_forward
- This problem is based on the fundamental option pricing formula for the continuous-time model developed in class, namely the value at time 0 of an option with maturity T and payoff F is given by: We consider the two options below: Fo= -rT = e Eq[F]. 1 A. An option with which you must buy a share of stock at expiration T = 1 for strike price K = So. B. An option with which you must buy a share of stock at expiration T = 1 for strike price K given by T K = T St dt. (Note that both options can have negative payoffs.) We use the continuous-time Black- Scholes model to price these options. Assume that the interest rate on the money market is r. (a) Using the fundamental option pricing formula, find the price of option A. (Hint: use the martingale properties developed in the lectures for the stock price process in order to calculate the expectations.) (b) Using the fundamental option pricing formula, find the price of option B. (c) Assuming the interest rate is very small (r ~0), use Taylor…arrow_forwardDiscuss and explain in the picturearrow_forwardBob and Teresa each collect their own samples to test the same hypothesis. Bob’s p-value turns out to be 0.05, and Teresa’s turns out to be 0.01. Why don’t Bob and Teresa get the same p-values? Who has stronger evidence against the null hypothesis: Bob or Teresa?arrow_forward
- Review a classmate's Main Post. 1. State if you agree or disagree with the choices made for additional analysis that can be done beyond the frequency table. 2. Choose a measure of central tendency (mean, median, mode) that you would like to compute with the data beyond the frequency table. Complete either a or b below. a. Explain how that analysis can help you understand the data better. b. If you are currently unable to do that analysis, what do you think you could do to make it possible? If you do not think you can do anything, explain why it is not possible.arrow_forward0|0|0|0 - Consider the time series X₁ and Y₁ = (I – B)² (I – B³)Xt. What transformations were performed on Xt to obtain Yt? seasonal difference of order 2 simple difference of order 5 seasonal difference of order 1 seasonal difference of order 5 simple difference of order 2arrow_forwardCalculate the 90% confidence interval for the population mean difference using the data in the attached image. I need to see where I went wrong.arrow_forward
- Microsoft Excel snapshot for random sampling: Also note the formula used for the last column 02 x✓ fx =INDEX(5852:58551, RANK(C2, $C$2:$C$51)) A B 1 No. States 2 1 ALABAMA Rand No. 0.925957526 3 2 ALASKA 0.372999976 4 3 ARIZONA 0.941323044 5 4 ARKANSAS 0.071266381 Random Sample CALIFORNIA NORTH CAROLINA ARKANSAS WASHINGTON G7 Microsoft Excel snapshot for systematic sampling: xfx INDEX(SD52:50551, F7) A B E F G 1 No. States Rand No. Random Sample population 50 2 1 ALABAMA 0.5296685 NEW HAMPSHIRE sample 10 3 2 ALASKA 0.4493186 OKLAHOMA k 5 4 3 ARIZONA 0.707914 KANSAS 5 4 ARKANSAS 0.4831379 NORTH DAKOTA 6 5 CALIFORNIA 0.7277162 INDIANA Random Sample Sample Name 7 6 COLORADO 0.5865002 MISSISSIPPI 8 7:ONNECTICU 0.7640596 ILLINOIS 9 8 DELAWARE 0.5783029 MISSOURI 525 10 15 INDIANA MARYLAND COLORADOarrow_forwardSuppose the Internal Revenue Service reported that the mean tax refund for the year 2022 was $3401. Assume the standard deviation is $82.5 and that the amounts refunded follow a normal probability distribution. Solve the following three parts? (For the answer to question 14, 15, and 16, start with making a bell curve. Identify on the bell curve where is mean, X, and area(s) to be determined. 1.What percent of the refunds are more than $3,500? 2. What percent of the refunds are more than $3500 but less than $3579? 3. What percent of the refunds are more than $3325 but less than $3579?arrow_forwardA normal distribution has a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 4. Solve the following three parts? 1. Compute the probability of a value between 44.0 and 55.0. (The question requires finding probability value between 44 and 55. Solve it in 3 steps. In the first step, use the above formula and x = 44, calculate probability value. In the second step repeat the first step with the only difference that x=55. In the third step, subtract the answer of the first part from the answer of the second part.) 2. Compute the probability of a value greater than 55.0. Use the same formula, x=55 and subtract the answer from 1. 3. Compute the probability of a value between 52.0 and 55.0. (The question requires finding probability value between 52 and 55. Solve it in 3 steps. In the first step, use the above formula and x = 52, calculate probability value. In the second step repeat the first step with the only difference that x=55. In the third step, subtract the answer of the first part from the…arrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman





