MICROECONOMICS FOR TODAY (LL)-W/MINDTAP
MICROECONOMICS FOR TODAY (LL)-W/MINDTAP
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337739115
Author: Tucker
Publisher: CENGAGE L
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 12, Problem 1SQP

(a):

To determine

Cumulative distribution of income.

(a):

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The economic development is achieved when the economic price increases per head of the population in the economy. The unequal distribution of the economic price between the people in the economy causes the income inequality in the economy. The income inequality is the situation in the economy in which the major part of the income will be earned by a smaller proportion of the population and vice versa.

The cumulative share of income can be easily calculated by adding the share of income with each preceding level's cumulative share of income. Here, in this case, the percentage share of income for A for the lowest fifth is 17.7 percent. Since there are no preceding levels, the cumulative share would remain the same as 17.7 percent. The percentage share of income for the second lowest fifth is 19.9 percent. Thus, the cumulative share of the second lowest fifth will be summation of the percentage share of both lowest fifth and second lowest fifth, which can be calculated as follows:

Cumulative share of incomeSecond lowest fifth=[Percentage of incomeLowest fifth+Percentage of incomesecond Lowest fifth]=17.7+19.9=37.6

Thus, the cumulative share of income for the second lowest fifth is calculated to be 37.6 percent. Similarly, the cumulative share of income can be calculated, and the table can be completed as follows:

 AB
Percentage of familiesPercentage shareCumulative sharePercentage shareCumulative share
Lowest fifth17.7%17.7%9.0%9.0%
Second lowest fifth19.937.614.223.2
Middle fifth20.458.017.540.7
Second highest fifth20.778.721.962.6
Highest fifth21.3100.037.4100.0
Economics Concept Introduction

Income Inequality: The income inequality is the situation where most of the national income of the economy would be produced by a small percentage of the population, whereas the minor portion of the national income would be accounted by the largest portion of the population. Thus, there will be a highest concentration of wealth in a few people in the economy.

(b):

To determine

Lorenz curve of the economy.

(b):

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The Lorenz curve is the graphical illustration of the distribution of wealth in the economy. It is drawn on the cumulative percentage of income against the cumulative percentage of the population. Thus, it shows the cumulative shares of income received by the family. Thus, based on the table above, the Lorenz curve can be constructed as follows:

MICROECONOMICS FOR TODAY (LL)-W/MINDTAP, Chapter 12, Problem 1SQP

(c):

To determine

Country with more equal distribution of income.

(c):

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

From the Lorenz curve diagram, it can be identified that the line that lies more close to the line of equality has more equal distribution of income. From the diagram, it is identified that Lorenz curve of Country A is closest to the line of equality and thus, Country A has more equal income distribution.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
General Accounting Question solution and give me Blank ? C
It is possible to use transformational leadership strategies to reach unethical objectives.  Traditional leadership theories and morals standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues. For the statement above, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statements.
Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Micro Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:9781337613064
Author:Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher:Cengage,
Text book image
Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:9781337613040
Author:Tucker
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:9781337617406
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Principles of Economics 2e
Economics
ISBN:9781947172364
Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:OpenStax
Text book image
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506893
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning