
(a):
Cumulative distribution of income.
(a):

Explanation of Solution
The economic development is achieved when the economic price increases per head of the population in the economy. The unequal distribution of the economic price between the people in the economy causes the income inequality in the economy. The income inequality is the situation in the economy in which the major part of the income will be earned by a smaller proportion of the population and vice versa.
The cumulative share of income can be easily calculated by adding the share of income with each preceding level's cumulative share of income. Here, in this case, the percentage share of income for A for the lowest fifth is 17.7 percent. Since there are no preceding levels, the cumulative share would remain the same as 17.7 percent. The percentage share of income for the second lowest fifth is 19.9 percent. Thus, the cumulative share of the second lowest fifth will be summation of the percentage share of both lowest fifth and second lowest fifth, which can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the cumulative share of income for the second lowest fifth is calculated to be 37.6 percent. Similarly, the cumulative share of income can be calculated, and the table can be completed as follows:
A | B | |||
Percentage of families | Percentage share | Cumulative share | Percentage share | Cumulative share |
Lowest fifth | 17.7% | 17.7% | 9.0% | 9.0% |
Second lowest fifth | 19.9 | 37.6 | 14.2 | 23.2 |
Middle fifth | 20.4 | 58.0 | 17.5 | 40.7 |
Second highest fifth | 20.7 | 78.7 | 21.9 | 62.6 |
Highest fifth | 21.3 | 100.0 | 37.4 | 100.0 |
Income Inequality: The income inequality is the situation where most of the
(b):
Lorenz curve of the economy.
(b):

Explanation of Solution
The Lorenz curve is the graphical illustration of the distribution of wealth in the economy. It is drawn on the cumulative percentage of income against the cumulative percentage of the population. Thus, it shows the cumulative shares of income received by the family. Thus, based on the table above, the Lorenz curve can be constructed as follows:
(c):
Country with more equal distribution of income.
(c):

Explanation of Solution
From the Lorenz curve diagram, it can be identified that the line that lies more close to the line of equality has more equal distribution of income. From the diagram, it is identified that Lorenz curve of Country A is closest to the line of equality and thus, Country A has more equal income distribution.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 12 Solutions
MICROECONOMICS FOR TODAY (LL)-W/MINDTAP
- Section III: Empirical Findings: Descriptive Statistics and inferential statistics………………..40% Descriptive statistics provide details about the Y variable, based on the sample for the 10-year period. Here, you use Excell or manually compute Mean or the average income per capita. Interpret the meaning of average income per capita. Draw the line chart showing the educational performance over the time-period of your study. Label the Vertical axis as Y performance and X axis as the explanatory variable (X1) . Do the same thing between Y and X2 Empirical/ Inferential Statistics: Here, use the sample information to perform the following: Draw the Scatter plot and impose the trend line: showing the Y variable and explanatory variables ( X1). Draw the scatter plot and impose the tend line: Showing Y and X2. Does your evidence (data) support your theory? Refer to the trend line: Is the relationship positive or negative as expected? Create graphs based on table below; Years Y ( per…arrow_forwardPlease help me with this Accounting questionarrow_forwardTitle: Does the educational performance depend on its literacy rate and government spending over the last 10 years? In the introduction, there are four things to include:a) Clearly state your research topic follows by country’s background in terms of (population density; male/female ratio; and identify the problem leading up to the study of it, such as government spending and adult literacy rate. How does the US perform compared to other countries.b) State the research question that you wish to resolve: Does the US economic performance depend on its government spending on education and the literacy rate over the last 10 years. Define performance (Y) as the average income per capita, an indicator of the country’s economy growing over time. For example, an increase in government spending leads to higher literacy rates and subsequently higher productivity in the economy. Also, mention that you will use a sample size of 10 years of secondary data from the existing literature,…arrow_forward
- Title: Does the educational performance depend on its literacy rate and government spending over the last 10 years? In the introduction, there are four things to include:a) Clearly state your research topic follows by country’s background in terms of (population density; male/female ratio; and identify the problem leading up to the study of it, such as government spending and adult literacy rate. How does the US perform compared to other countries.b) State the research question that you wish to resolve: Does the US economic performance depend on its government spending on education and the literacy rate over the last 10 years. Define performance (Y) as the average income per capita, an indicator of the country’s economy growing over time. For example, an increase in government spending leads to higher literacy rates and subsequently higher productivity in the economy. Also, mention that you will use a sample size of 10 years of secondary data from the existing literature,…arrow_forwardExplain how the introduction of egg replacers and plant-based egg products will impact the bakery industry. Provide a graphical representation.arrow_forwardExplain Professor Frederick's "cognitive reflection" test.arrow_forward
- 11:44 Fri Apr 4 Would+You+Take+the+Bird+in+the+Hand Would You Take the Bird in the Hand, or a 75% Chance at the Two in the Bush? BY VIRGINIA POSTREL WOULD you rather have $1,000 for sure or a 90 percent chance of $5,000? A guaranteed $1,000 or a 75 percent chance of $4,000? In economic theory, questions like these have no right or wrong answers. Even if a gamble is mathematically more valuable a 75 percent chance of $4,000 has an expected value of $3,000, for instance someone may still prefer a sure thing. People have different tastes for risk, just as they have different tastes for ice cream or paint colors. The same is true for waiting: Would you rather have $400 now or $100 every year for 10 years? How about $3,400 this month or $3,800 next month? Different people will answer differently. Economists generally accept those differences without further explanation, while decision researchers tend to focus on average behavior. In decision research, individual differences "are regarded…arrow_forwardDescribe the various measures used to assess poverty and economic inequality. Analyze the causes and consequences of poverty and inequality, and discuss potential policies and programs aimed at reducing them, assess the adequacy of current environmental regulations in addressing negative externalities. analyze the role of labor unions in labor markets. What is one benefit, and one challenge associated with labor unions.arrow_forwardEvaluate the effectiveness of supply and demand models in predicting labor market outcomes. Justify your assessment with specific examples from real-world labor markets.arrow_forward
- Explain the difference between Microeconomics and Macroeconomics? 2.) Explain what fiscal policy is and then explain what Monetary Policy is? 3.) Why is opportunity cost and give one example from your own of opportunity cost. 4.) What are models and what model did we already discuss in class? 5.) What is meant by scarcity of resources?arrow_forward2. What is the payoff from a long futures position where you are obligated to buy at the contract price? What is the payoff from a short futures position where you are obligated to sell at the contract price?? Draw the payoff diagram for each position. Payoff from Futures Contract F=$50.85 S1 Long $100 $95 $90 $85 $80 $75 $70 $65 $60 $55 $50.85 $50 $45 $40 $35 $30 $25 Shortarrow_forward3. Consider a call on the same underlier (Cisco). The strike is $50.85, which is the forward price. The owner of the call has the choice or option to buy at the strike. They get to see the market price S1 before they decide. We assume they are rational. What is the payoff from owning (also known as being long) the call? What is the payoff from selling (also known as being short) the call? Payoff from Call with Strike of k=$50.85 S1 Long $100 $95 $90 $85 $80 $75 $70 $65 $60 $55 $50.85 $50 $45 $40 $35 $30 $25 Shortarrow_forward
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStaxMicroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning





