Review Preparation for Statistics A statistics instructor wanted to see if student participation in review preparation methods led to higher examination scores. Five students were randomly selected and placed in each test group for a three-week unit on statistical inference. Everyone took the same examination at the end of the unit, and the resulting scores are shown. Is there sufficient evidence at a = 0.05 to conclude an interaction between the two factors? Is there sufficient evidence to conclude a difference in mean scores based on formula delivery system? Is there sufficient evidence to conclude a difference in mean scores based on the review organization technique?
Formulas provided | Student-made formula cards | |
Student-led review | 89, 76, 80, 90, 75 | 94, 86, 80, 79, 82 |
Instructor-led review | 75, 80, 68, 65, 79 | 88, 78, 85, 65, 72 |
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 12 Solutions
Bluman, Elementary Statistics: A Step By Step Approach, © 2015, 9e, Student Edition (reinforced Binding) (a/p Statistics)
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw HillBig Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu...AlgebraISBN:9781680331141Author:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURTPublisher:Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
- College Algebra (MindTap Course List)AlgebraISBN:9781305652231Author:R. David Gustafson, Jeff HughesPublisher:Cengage Learning