Concept explainers
a.
Calculate the values of
a.
Answer to Problem 43E
The value of
The value of
The value of
The value of
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The number of years of service (x) and the hourly wages ($) (y) of the five employees of a small company are given.
Denote
Software procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to obtain the descriptive statistics using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > Display Descriptive Statistics, click OK.
- In Variables, enter the columns of x and y.
- Choose Statistics, select Mean, Standard deviation and click OK.
- Click OK.
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
From the above output, it is evident that the value of
b.
Find the
b.
Answer to Problem 43E
The
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Correlation:
The correlation coefficient, r, between ordered pairs of variables, (x, y) having sample means
Software procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to obtain the correlation using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > Correlation.
- In Variables, enter the columns of x and y.
- Click OK.
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
From the output, the correlation coefficient between the years of service and the hourly wages is 0.906.
c.
Find the sample mean and the sample standard deviation of the hourly wages, if each employee is given a raise of $1.00 per hour.
c.
Answer to Problem 43E
The sample mean of the hourly wages, if each employee is given a raise of $1.00 per hour is 11.828.
The sample standard deviation of the hourly wages, if each employee is given a raise of $1.00 per hour is 1.981.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Denote
The calculation for
y | |
9.50 | 10.50 |
8.23 | 9.23 |
10.95 | 11.95 |
12.70 | 13.70 |
12.75 | 13.75 |
Descriptive statistics:
Software procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to obtain the descriptive statistics using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > Display Descriptive Statistics, click OK.
- In Variables, enter the columns of y1.
- Choose Statistics, select Mean, Standard deviation and click OK.
- Click OK.
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
From the above output, it is evident that the sample mean of the hourly wages, if each employee is given a raise of $1.00 per hour is 11.828 and the sample standard deviation of the hourly wages, if each employee is given a raise of $1.00 per hour is 1.981.
d.
Identify the effects of increasing each value of y by 1 on the values of
d.
Answer to Problem 43E
The average hourly wage
The standard deviation
Explanation of Solution
Interpretation:
From part a, the value of average hourly wages,
From part c, the value of sample mean of the hourly wages, if each employee is given a raise of $1.00 per hour is 11.828.
Now,
Hence, it is evident that the average hourly wage has increased by $1.00 due to increasing each value of y by 1.
From part a, the value of standard deviation of hourly wages,
From part c, the value of sample standard deviation , if each employee is given a raise of $1.00 per hour is 1.981.
Evidently, the standard deviation has remained unchanged due to increasing each value of y by 1.
e.
Find the correlation coefficient between the years of service and the increased hourly wages.
Explain the reason the correlation coefficient remains unchanged even when the values of y change.
e.
Answer to Problem 43E
The correlation coefficient between the years of service and the increased hourly wages is 0.906.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Correlation:
Software procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to obtain the correlation using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > Correlation.
- In Variables, enter the columns of x and y1.
- Click OK.
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
From the output, the correlation coefficient between the years of service and the increased hourly wages is 0.906.
Consider the formula for the correlation coefficient, r:
Now, each y increases and becomes
Again, as observed from part d, the mean of the increased hourly wages is
Replace these in the formula for the correlation coefficient:
It is observed that the correlation coefficient is independent of the change of origin.
Hence, the correlation coefficient remains unchanged even when the values of y change.
f.
Find the sample mean and the sample standard deviation of the service period, if it is expressed in terms of months.
f.
Answer to Problem 43E
The sample mean of the hourly wages, of the service period, if it is expressed in terms of months is 21.
The sample standard deviation of the hourly wages, of the service period, if it is expressed in terms of months is 12.37.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Denote
The calculation for
x | |
0.5 | 6 |
1.0 | 12 |
1.75 | 21 |
2.5 | 30 |
3.0 | 36 |
Descriptive statistics:
Software procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to obtain the descriptive statistics using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > Display Descriptive Statistics, click OK.
- In Variables, enter the columns of x1.
- Choose Statistics, select Mean, Standard deviation and click OK.
- Click OK.
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
From the above output, it is evident that the sample mean of the hourly wages, of the service period, if it is expressed in terms of months is 21 and the sample standard deviation of the hourly wages, of the service period, if it is expressed in terms of months is 12.37.
g.
Identify the effects of multiplying each value of x by 12 on the values of
g.
Answer to Problem 43E
The average service period in months has been multiplied by 12 due to multiplying each value of x by 12.
The standard deviation has been multiplied by 12 due to multiplying each value of x by 12.
Explanation of Solution
Interpretation:
From part a, the average service period in years,
From part f, the average service period in months is 21.
Now,
Hence, it is evident that the average hourly wage has increased by $1.00 due to increasing each value of y by 1.
From part a, the value of standard deviation of service period in years,
From part c, the value of sample standard deviation of service period in months is 12.37.
Now,
In other words,
Evidently, the standard deviation has been multiplied by 12 due to multiplying each value of x by 12.
h.
Find the correlation coefficient between the months of service and the hourly wages.
Explain the reason the correlation coefficient remains unchanged even when the values of
h.
Answer to Problem 43E
The correlation coefficient between the months of service and the increased hourly wages is 0.906.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Correlation:
Software procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to obtain the correlation using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > Correlation.
- In Variables, enter the columns of x1 and y.
- Click OK.
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
From the output, the correlation coefficient between the months of service and the increased hourly wages is 0.906.
Consider the formula for the correlation coefficient, r:
Now, each x is multiplied by 12 and becomes
Again, as observed from part d, the mean of the months of service is
Replace these in the formula for the correlation coefficient:
It is observed that the correlation coefficient is independent of the changes of origin and scale.
Hence, the correlation coefficient remains unchanged even when the values of
i.
Find the effect of adding a constant to each x-value or to each y-value on the correlation coefficient.
i.
Answer to Problem 43E
If a constant is added to each x-value or to each y-value, the correlation coefficient is unchanged.
Explanation of Solution
Interpretation:
The correlation coefficient is independent of the change of origin of the variables. Adding a constant to each x-value or to each y-value implies a change in origin of x or y.
Hence, if a constant is added to each x-value or to each y-value, the correlation coefficient is unchanged.
Correlation:
The correlation coefficient, r, between ordered pairs of variables, (x, y) having sample means
j.
Find the effect of multiplying a positive constant to each x-value or to each y-value on the correlation coefficient.
j.
Answer to Problem 43E
If each x-value or each y-value is multiplied by a positive constant, the correlation coefficient is unchanged.
Explanation of Solution
Interpretation:
The correlation coefficient is independent of the change of scale of the variables. Multiplying a positive constant with each x-value or each y-value changes the scale of x or y.
Hence, if each x-value or each y-value is multiplied by a positive constant, the correlation coefficient is unchanged.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 11 Solutions
Essential Statistics
- 1 M&Ms colors come in the following percent- ages: 13 percent brown, 14 percent yellow, 13 percent red, 24 percent blue, 20 percent orange, and 16 percent green. Reach into a bag of M&Ms without looking. a. What's the chance that you pull out a brown or yellow M&M? b. What's the chance that you won't pull out a blue? swarrow_forward11. Prove or disprove: (a) If is a characteristic function, then so is ²; (b) If is a non-negative characteristic function, then so is √√4.arrow_forward4. Suppose that P(X = 1) = P(X = -1) = 1/2, that Y = U(-1, 1) and that X and Y are independent. (a) Show, by direct computation, that X + Y = U(-2, 2). (b) Translate the result to a statement about characteristic functions. (c) Which well-known trigonometric formula did you discover?arrow_forward
- 9. The concentration function of a random variable X is defined as Qx(h) = sup P(x ≤ X ≤x+h), h>0. x (a) Show that Qx+b (h) = Qx(h). (b) Is it true that Qx(ah) =aQx(h)? (c) Show that, if X and Y are independent random variables, then Qx+y (h) min{Qx(h). Qy (h)). To put the concept in perspective, if X1, X2, X, are independent, identically distributed random variables, and S₁ = Z=1Xk, then there exists an absolute constant, A, such that A Qs, (h) ≤ √n Some references: [79, 80, 162, 222], and [204], Sect. 1.5.arrow_forward29 Suppose that a mound-shaped data set has a must mean of 10 and standard deviation of 2. a. About what percentage of the data should lie between 6 and 12? b. About what percentage of the data should lie between 4 and 6? c. About what percentage of the data should lie below 4? 91002 175/1 3arrow_forward2,3, ample and rical t? the 28 Suppose that a mound-shaped data set has a mean of 10 and standard deviation of 2. a. About what percentage of the data should lie between 8 and 12? b. About what percentage of the data should lie above 10? c. About what percentage of the data should lie above 12?arrow_forward
- 27 Suppose that you have a data set of 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, and you assume that this sample represents a population. The mean is 3 and g the standard deviation is 1.225.10 a. Explain why you can apply the empirical rule to this data set. b. Where would "most of the values" in the population fall, based on this data set?arrow_forward30 Explain how you can use the empirical rule to find out whether a data set is mound- shaped, using only the values of the data themselves (no histogram available).arrow_forward5. Let X be a positive random variable with finite variance, and let A = (0, 1). Prove that P(X AEX) 2 (1-A)² (EX)² EX2arrow_forward
- 6. Let, for p = (0, 1), and xe R. X be a random variable defined as follows: P(X=-x) = P(X = x)=p. P(X=0)= 1-2p. Show that there is equality in Chebyshev's inequality for X. This means that Chebyshev's inequality, in spite of being rather crude, cannot be improved without additional assumptions.arrow_forward4. Prove that, for any random variable X, the minimum of EIX-al is attained for a = med (X).arrow_forward8. Recall, from Sect. 2.16.4, the likelihood ratio statistic, Ln, which was defined as a product of independent, identically distributed random variables with mean 1 (under the so-called null hypothesis), and the, sometimes more convenient, log-likelihood, log L, which was a sum of independent, identically distributed random variables, which, however, do not have mean log 1 = 0. (a) Verify that the last claim is correct, by proving the more general statement, namely that, if Y is a non-negative random variable with finite mean, then E(log Y) log(EY). (b) Prove that, in fact, there is strict inequality: E(log Y) < log(EY), unless Y is degenerate. (c) Review the proof of Jensen's inequality, Theorem 5.1. Generalize with a glimpse on (b).arrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman