Concept explainers
a.
To calculate: The NPV and IRR of the given project with and without mitigation.
Introduction:
Capital Budgeting:
It refers to the long term investment decisions that has been taken by the top management of a company and that are irreversible in nature. These decisions require investment of large amount of the company’s cash.
It is a method under capital budgeting which includes the calculation of net present value of the project in which the company is investing. The calculation is done by calculating the difference between the value of
It refers to the rate of return that is computed by the company to make a decision regarding the selection of a project for investment. This rate provides the basis for selection of projects with lower cost of capital and rejection of project with higher cost of capital.
b.
To identify: The way in which the environmental effects should be dealt with when this project is evaluated.
c.
To explain: Whether the project should be undertaken or not with or without mitigation.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 11 Solutions
Fundamentals Of Financial Management
- An electric utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona. Power from the plant would be sold in the Phoenix area, where it is badly needed. Because the firm has received a permit, the plant would be legal; but it would cause some air pollution. The company could spend an additional $40 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. The plant without mitigation would require an initial outlay of $240.20 million, and the expected cash Inflows would be $80 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $84.06 million. Unemployment in the area where the plant would be built is high, and the plant would provide about 350 good jobs. The risk adjusted WACC is 19%. a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Negative values, if any, should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not…arrow_forwardPlease see image for question.arrow_forwardAn electric utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona. Power from the plant would be sold in the Phoenix area, where it is badly needed. Because the firm has received a permit, the plant would be legal; but it would cause some air pollution. The company could spend an additional $40 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. The plant without mitigation would require an initial outlay of $209.80 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $70 million p year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $75.55 million. Unemployment in the area where the plant would be built is high, and the plant would provide about 350 good jobs. The risk adjusted WACC is 17%. a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Negative values, in any, should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not…arrow_forward
- An electric utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona. Power from the plant would be sold in the Phoenix area, where it is badly needed. Because the firm has received a permit, the plant would be legal; but it would cause some air pollution. The company could spend an additional $40 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. The plant without mitigation would require an initial outlay of $269.87 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $90 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $93.62 million. Unemployment in the area where the plant would be built is high, and the plant would provide about 350 good jobs. The risk adjusted WACC is 16%. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Negative values, if any, should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not…arrow_forwardAn electric utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona. Power from the plant would be sold in the Phoenix area, where it is badly needed. Because the firm has received a permit, the plant would be legal; but it would cause some air pollution. The company could spend an additional $40 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. The plant without mitigation would require an initial outlay of $269.75 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $90 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $93.85 million. Unemployment in the area where the plant would be built is high, and the plant would provide about 350 good jobs. The risk adjusted WACC is 17%. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Negative values, if any, should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not…arrow_forwardPlease show the solution on excel spreadsheet and please indicate the formulas used. Thank you.arrow_forward
- New York City is evaluating the construction of a new train station to serve a new high-speed rail system. The Capital Projects Team is responsible for evaluating whether the project is economically acceptable. The Capital Projects Team estimates that the new train station will generate $1B in annual revenue, and provide $1B a year in cost savings. The new train line will cannibalize some of the existing revenues the City receives from its current train system. The value of this cannibalization is estimated at $500 MM a year. The new station's costs of Maintenance and Operation are anticipated to amount to be $250 MM per year. The initial investment required to design and build the train station is expected to be $15 B. New York City is considered to be a high credit and can borrow long-term in the capital markets at a rate of 6%. The Capital Projects Team evaluates these types of projects over a study period of 25 years. What is the Modified B/C Ratio? .94 1.00 1.07 1.10arrow_forwardA proposed steel mill may include a co-generation electrical plant. This plant will add $2.3M in first cost with net annual savings of $0.27M considering operating costs and electrical bills. The plant will have a $0.4M salvage value after 25 years. The firm uses an interest rate of 12% and present worth index (PWI) in its decision making. The public utility offers a subsidy for co-generation facilities because it will not have to invest as much in new capacity. This subsidy is calculated as 20% of the co-generation facility’s first cost, but it is paid annually. The utility calculates the subsidy using a benefit–cost ratio at 8% and a life of 20 years. (a) Is the plant economically justifiable to the firm without the subsidy? What is the PWI? (b) What is the annual subsidy? (c) Is the plant economically justifiable to the firm with the subsidy? Now what is the PWI? (d) How important is the difference in interest rates, and how does it affect these results? (e) How important is the…arrow_forwardA mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $10 million at Year o to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would require an initial outlay of $60 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $20 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $21 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 12%. a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places. NPV: $ million IRR: Calculate the NPV and IRR without mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round…arrow_forward
- EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENTFinanceISBN:9781337514835Author:MOYERPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENTIntermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course...FinanceISBN:9781337395083Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. DavesPublisher:Cengage LearningCornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage Learning