Case summary: Stolichnaya vodka was produced and sold by the Union S for half a century. It was licensed and trademarked in the U.S. by VVO-SPI, an enterprise named S. VVO-SPI that came under the authority of SPI after the insolvency of the Union S. However, Russian court claimed that VVO-SPI was not privatized legally under its law, therefore, the authority and possession were held by the beneficiary of Union S, the Russian Federation. Further, the Federation assigned the mark to FTE, a federal enterprise. To this, FTE alleged against SPI for violation and manipulation of the trademark in U.S. federal district court.
To find: The validity of assigning the trademark to FTE.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 11 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases
- What is the profit margin if the tax rate is 32 percent?arrow_forwardNova Flex Corp. had net fixed assets of $20,500 at the start of the year and $21,800 at the end. The company recorded $4,200 in depreciation and spent $9,000 on purchasing new fixed assets. How much in fixed assets did Nova Flex Corp. sell during the year?arrow_forwardPlease given correct answer for General accounting question I need step by step explanationarrow_forward
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education