Allegations were made against the Philippines producers of canned pineapples for selling the undervalued products in the U.S. The producers were also involved in exporting other products such as pineapple juice and its concentration, which lowered the overall cost of canned pineapple, as claimed by the producers. The court calculated the production cost and found it to be 90 percent more than the total production cost. To find: The applied approach is reasonable to determine the cost of production and the reasonable market value of the canned or preserved pineapple in the U.S.

Question

The U.S. Pineapple industry alleged that producers of canned pineapple from the Philippines were selling their canned pineapple in the United states for less than its fair market value (dumping). In addition to canned pineapple, the Philippine producers exported other products used as pineapple juice and juice concentrate. these products used separate parts of the same fresh pineapple used for the canned pineapple. All these products shared raw material costs with the canned fruit, according to the producers' own financial records. To determine fair value and anti-dumping duties, the pineapple industry argued that a court should calculate the Philippine producers' cost of production and allocate a portion of the shared fruit costs to the canned fruit. The result of this allocation showed that more than 90 percent of the canned fruit sales were below the cost of production. Is this a reasonable approach to determining the production costs and fair market value of canned pineapple…

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 11, Problem 2BS

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Allegations were made against the Philippines producers of canned pineapples for selling the undervalued products in the U.S. The producers were also involved in exporting other products such as pineapple juice and its concentration, which lowered the overall cost of canned pineapple, as claimed by the producers. The court calculated the production cost and found it to be 90 percent more than the total production cost.

To find: The applied approach is reasonable to determine the cost of production and the reasonable market value of the canned or preserved pineapple in the U.S.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

The U.S. Pineapple industry alleged that producers of canned pineapple from the Philippines were selling their canned pineapple in the United states for less than its fair market value (dumping). In addition to canned pineapple, the Philippine producers exported other products used as pineapple juice and juice concentrate. these products used separate parts of the same fresh pineapple used for the canned pineapple. All these products shared raw material costs with the canned fruit, according to the producers' own financial records. To determine fair value and anti-dumping duties, the pineapple industry argued that a court should calculate the Philippine producers' cost of production and allocate a portion of the shared fruit costs to the canned fruit. The result of this allocation showed that more than 90 percent of the canned fruit sales were below the cost of production. Is this a reasonable approach to determining the production costs and fair market value of canned pineapple…

"French survivors of the Holocaust sued Yahoo USA because French citizens were purchasing Nazi memorabilia on Yahoo’s U.S. website. The lawsuit also charged Yahoo USA with hosting the websites of anti-Semitic groups.

For the scenario below, determine the legality of the company's actions. Ioncorp sells cabinets nationwide to the furniture company Blinkorp. It makes an agreement that Blinkorp will only sell Ioncorp cabinets in its warehouses. Strictly illegal Legal Illegal, depending on impact