Concept explainers
Check whether there is a difference in the mean number of times men and women order take-out dinners in a month.
Find the p-value.
Answer to Problem 21CE
The conclusion is that there is no difference in the mean number of times men and women order take-out dinners in a month.
The p-value is 0.063.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The null and alternative hypotheses are stated below:
Let
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
Significance level,
It is given that the significance level,
Degrees of freedom:
The degrees of freedom is as follows:
Thus, the number of degrees of freedom is 73.
Step-by-step procedure to obtain the critical value using MINITAB software:
- Choose Graph > Probability Distribution Plot choose View Probability > OK.
- From Distribution, choose ‘t’ distribution.
- In Degrees of freedom, enter 73.
- Click the Shaded Area tab.
- Choose P Value and both Tails for the region of the curve to shade.
- Enter the probability value as 0.01.
- Click OK.
Output obtained using MINITAB software is given below:
From the MINITAB output, the critical value is ±2.645.
The decision rule is as follows:
If
If
Pooled estimate:
The pooled estimate of the population variance is as follows:
Substitute
Test statistic:
The test statistic for the hypothesis test of
Substitute
Thus, the test statistic is 1.890.
Decision:
The critical value is 2.645, and the value of the test statistic is 1.890.
The value of the test statistic is less than the critical value.
That is,
From the decision rule, fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Therefore, there is no evidence that the mean number of times men and women order take-out dinners in a month.
p-value:
Step-by-step procedure to obtain the p-value using MINITAB software:
- Choose Graph > Probability Distribution Plot choose View Probability > OK.
- From Distribution, choose ‘t’ distribution.
- In Degrees of freedom, enter 73.
- Click the Shaded Area tab.
- Choose X Value and Two Tail for the region of the curve to shade.
- Enter the X value as 1.890.
- Click OK.
Output obtained using MINITAB software is given below:
From the MINITAB output, the p-value is 0.03136.
Thus, the p-value is 0.063.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 11 Solutions
Loose Leaf for Statistical Techniques in Business and Economics
- solve on paperarrow_forwardsolve the question based on hw 1, 1.41arrow_forwardT1.4: Let ẞ(G) be the minimum size of a vertex cover, a(G) be the maximum size of an independent set and m(G) = |E(G)|. (i) Prove that if G is triangle free (no induced K3) then m(G) ≤ a(G)B(G). Hints - The neighborhood of a vertex in a triangle free graph must be independent; all edges have at least one end in a vertex cover. (ii) Show that all graphs of order n ≥ 3 and size m> [n2/4] contain a triangle. Hints - you may need to use either elementary calculus or the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality.arrow_forward
- We consider the one-period model studied in class as an example. Namely, we assumethat the current stock price is S0 = 10. At time T, the stock has either moved up toSt = 12 (with probability p = 0.6) or down towards St = 8 (with probability 1−p = 0.4).We consider a call option on this stock with maturity T and strike price K = 10. Theinterest rate on the money market is zero.As in class, we assume that you, as a customer, are willing to buy the call option on100 shares of stock for $120. The investor, who sold you the option, can adopt one of thefollowing strategies: Strategy 1: (seen in class) Buy 50 shares of stock and borrow $380. Strategy 2: Buy 55 shares of stock and borrow $430. Strategy 3: Buy 60 shares of stock and borrow $480. Strategy 4: Buy 40 shares of stock and borrow $280.(a) For each of strategies 2-4, describe the value of the investor’s portfolio at time 0,and at time T for each possible movement of the stock.(b) For each of strategies 2-4, does the investor have…arrow_forwardNegate the following compound statement using De Morgans's laws.arrow_forwardNegate the following compound statement using De Morgans's laws.arrow_forward
- Question 6: Negate the following compound statements, using De Morgan's laws. A) If Alberta was under water entirely then there should be no fossil of mammals.arrow_forwardNegate the following compound statement using De Morgans's laws.arrow_forwardCharacterize (with proof) all connected graphs that contain no even cycles in terms oftheir blocks.arrow_forward
- Let G be a connected graph that does not have P4 or C3 as an induced subgraph (i.e.,G is P4, C3 free). Prove that G is a complete bipartite grapharrow_forwardProve sufficiency of the condition for a graph to be bipartite that is, prove that if G hasno odd cycles then G is bipartite as follows:Assume that the statement is false and that G is an edge minimal counterexample. That is, Gsatisfies the conditions and is not bipartite but G − e is bipartite for any edge e. (Note thatthis is essentially induction, just using different terminology.) What does minimality say aboutconnectivity of G? Can G − e be disconnected? Explain why if there is an edge between twovertices in the same part of a bipartition of G − e then there is an odd cyclearrow_forwardLet G be a connected graph that does not have P4 or C4 as an induced subgraph (i.e.,G is P4, C4 free). Prove that G has a vertex adjacent to all othersarrow_forward
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw Hill