Equipment replacement decisions and performance evaluation. Susan Smith manages the Wexford plant of Sanchez Manufacturing. A representative of Darnell Engineering approaches Smith about replacing a large piece of manufacturing equipment that Sanchez uses in its process with a more efficient model. While the representative made some compelling arguments in favor of replacing the 3-year-old equipment, Smith is hesitant. Smith is hoping to be promoted next year to manager of the larger Detroit plant, and she knows that the accrual-basis net operating income of the Wexford plant will be evaluated closely as part of the promotion decision. The following information is available concerning the equipment-replacement decision: Old Machine New Machine Original cost $900,000 $540,000 Useful life 5 years 2 years Current age 3 years 0 years Remaining useful life 2 years 2 years Accumulated depreciation $540,000 Not acquired yet Book value $360,000 Not acquired yet Current disposal value (in cash) $216,000 Not acquired yet Terminal disposal value (in cash 2 years from now) $0 $0 Annual operating costs (maintenance, energy, repairs, coolants, and so on) $995,000 $800,000 Sanchez uses straight-line depreciation on all equipment. Annual depreciation expense for the old machine is $180,000 and will be $270,000 on the new machine if it is acquired. For simplicity, ignore income taxes and the time value of money. 1. Assume that Smith’s priority is to receive the promotion and she makes the equipment-replacement decision based on the next one year’s accrual-based net operating income. Which alternative would she choose? Show your calculations. Required 2. What are the relevant factors in the decision? Which alternative is in the best interest of the company over the next 2 years? Show your calculations.
Equipment replacement decisions and performance evaluation. Susan Smith manages the Wexford plant of Sanchez Manufacturing. A representative of Darnell Engineering approaches Smith about replacing a large piece of manufacturing equipment that Sanchez uses in its process with a more efficient model. While the representative made some compelling arguments in favor of replacing the 3-year-old equipment, Smith is hesitant. Smith is hoping to be promoted next year to manager of the larger Detroit plant, and she knows that the accrual-basis net operating income of the Wexford plant will be evaluated closely as part of the promotion decision. The following information is available concerning the equipment-replacement decision: Old Machine New Machine Original cost $900,000 $540,000 Useful life 5 years 2 years Current age 3 years 0 years Remaining useful life 2 years 2 years Accumulated depreciation $540,000 Not acquired yet Book value $360,000 Not acquired yet Current disposal value (in cash) $216,000 Not acquired yet Terminal disposal value (in cash 2 years from now) $0 $0 Annual operating costs (maintenance, energy, repairs, coolants, and so on) $995,000 $800,000 Sanchez uses straight-line depreciation on all equipment. Annual depreciation expense for the old machine is $180,000 and will be $270,000 on the new machine if it is acquired. For simplicity, ignore income taxes and the time value of money. 1. Assume that Smith’s priority is to receive the promotion and she makes the equipment-replacement decision based on the next one year’s accrual-based net operating income. Which alternative would she choose? Show your calculations. Required 2. What are the relevant factors in the decision? Which alternative is in the best interest of the company over the next 2 years? Show your calculations.
Solution Summary: The author explains how to calculate the operating income of the old and new machine.
Equipment replacement decisions and performance evaluation. Susan Smith manages the Wexford plant of Sanchez Manufacturing. A representative of Darnell Engineering approaches Smith about replacing a large piece of manufacturing equipment that Sanchez uses in its process with a more efficient model. While the representative made some compelling arguments in favor of replacing the 3-year-old equipment, Smith is hesitant. Smith is hoping to be promoted next year to manager of the larger Detroit plant, and she knows that the accrual-basis net operating income of the Wexford plant will be evaluated closely as part of the promotion decision. The following information is available concerning the equipment-replacement decision:
Old Machine
New Machine
Original cost
$900,000
$540,000
Useful life
5 years
2 years
Current age
3 years
0 years
Remaining useful life
2 years
2 years
Accumulated depreciation
$540,000
Not acquired yet
Book value
$360,000
Not acquired yet
Current disposal value (in cash)
$216,000
Not acquired yet
Terminal disposal value (in cash 2 years from now)
$0
$0
Annual operating costs (maintenance, energy, repairs, coolants, and so on)
$995,000
$800,000
Sanchez uses straight-line depreciation on all equipment. Annual depreciation expense for the old machine is $180,000 and will be $270,000 on the new machine if it is acquired. For simplicity, ignore income taxes and the time value of money.
1. Assume that Smith’s priority is to receive the promotion and she makes the equipment-replacement decision based on the next one year’s accrual-based net operating income. Which alternative would she choose? Show your calculations.
Required
2. What are the relevant factors in the decision? Which alternative is in the best interest of the company over the next 2 years? Show your calculations.
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.