
Concept explainers
(a)
Section 1:
To graph: A
(a)
Section 1:

Explanation of Solution
Graph: Construct a scatterplot using Minitab as follows:
Step 1: Enter the data in Minitab.
Step 2: Click on Graph --> Scatterplot. Select scatterplot with regression.
Step 3: Double click on ‘Number of tornadoes’ to move it to Y variable and ‘Year’ to move it to X variable column.
Step 4: Click ‘Ok’ twice to obtain the graph.
Section 2:
To explain: The relationship between two variables seems linear.
Section 2:

Answer to Problem 19E
Solution: The variables are in linear relationship.
Explanation of Solution
Section 3:
To explain: Whether there are any outliers or unusual pattern.
Section 3:

Answer to Problem 19E
Solution: There are no outliers.
Explanation of Solution
(b)
To find: The least square regression line.
(b)

Answer to Problem 19E
Solution: The regression line is:
Explanation of Solution
Calculation: Obtain the regression line using Minitab as follows:
Step 1: Enter the data in Minitab.
Step 2: Click on Stat --> Regression --> Regression.
Step 3: Double click on ‘Number of tornadoes’ to move it to Y variable and ‘Year’ to move it to X variable column.
Step 4: Click on ‘Storage’ and check the box for residuals.
Step 5: Click ‘Ok’ twice to obtain the result.
Hence, the obtained regression line is
(c)
To explain: The intercept of regression equation.
(c)

Answer to Problem 19E
Solution: The fit is correct because intercept is only used when
Explanation of Solution
(d)
Section 1:
To find: The residuals.
(d)
Section 1:

Answer to Problem 19E
Solution: The residuals are as follows:
Years |
Number of tornadoes |
Residuals |
1953 |
421 |
-127.661 |
1954 |
550 |
-11.495 |
1955 |
593 |
18.670 |
1956 |
504 |
-83.164 |
1957 |
856 |
256.001 |
1958 |
564 |
-48.833 |
1959 |
604 |
-21.668 |
1960 |
616 |
-22.502 |
1961 |
697 |
45.663 |
1962 |
657 |
-7.171 |
1963 |
464 |
-213.006 |
1964 |
704 |
14.160 |
1965 |
906 |
203.325 |
1966 |
585 |
-130.509 |
1967 |
926 |
197.656 |
1968 |
660 |
-81.178 |
1969 |
608 |
-146.013 |
1970 |
653 |
-113.847 |
1971 |
888 |
108.318 |
1972 |
741 |
-51.516 |
1973 |
1102 |
296.649 |
1974 |
947 |
128.815 |
1975 |
920 |
88.980 |
1976 |
835 |
-8.854 |
1977 |
852 |
-4.689 |
1978 |
788 |
-81.523 |
1979 |
852 |
-30.358 |
1980 |
866 |
-29.192 |
1981 |
783 |
-125.027 |
1982 |
1046 |
125.139 |
1983 |
931 |
-2.696 |
1984 |
907 |
-39.530 |
1985 |
684 |
-275.365 |
1986 |
764 |
-208.199 |
1987 |
656 |
-329.034 |
1988 |
702 |
-295.868 |
1989 |
856 |
-154.703 |
1990 |
1133 |
109.463 |
1991 |
1132 |
95.628 |
1992 |
1298 |
248.794 |
1993 |
1176 |
113.959 |
1994 |
1082 |
7.125 |
1995 |
1235 |
147.290 |
1996 |
1173 |
72.456 |
1997 |
1148 |
34.621 |
1998 |
1449 |
322.787 |
1999 |
1340 |
200.952 |
2000 |
1075 |
-76.882 |
2001 |
1215 |
50.283 |
2002 |
934 |
-243.551 |
2003 |
1374 |
183.614 |
2004 |
1817 |
613.780 |
2005 |
1265 |
48.945 |
2006 |
1103 |
-125.889 |
2007 |
1096 |
-145.724 |
2008 |
1692 |
437.442 |
2009 |
1156 |
-111.393 |
2010 |
1282 |
1.773 |
2011 |
1691 |
397.938 |
2012 |
938 |
-367.896 |
2013 |
907 |
-411.731 |
2014 |
888 |
-443.565 |
Explanation of Solution
Calculation: Obtain the residuals using Minitab as follows:
Step 1: Enter the data in Minitab.
Step 2: Click on Stat --> Regression --> Regression.
Step 3: Double click on ‘Number of tornadoes’ to move it response column and ‘Year’ to move it to predictor column.
Step 4: Click on ‘Storage’ and check the box for residuals.
Step 5: Click ‘Ok’ to obtain the result.
Hence, the obtained residuals are shown below:
Years |
Number of tornadoes |
Residuals |
1953 |
421 |
-127.661 |
1954 |
550 |
-11.495 |
1955 |
593 |
18.670 |
1956 |
504 |
-83.164 |
1957 |
856 |
256.001 |
1958 |
564 |
-48.833 |
1959 |
604 |
-21.668 |
1960 |
616 |
-22.502 |
1961 |
697 |
45.663 |
1962 |
657 |
-7.171 |
1963 |
464 |
-213.006 |
1964 |
704 |
14.160 |
1965 |
906 |
203.325 |
1966 |
585 |
-130.509 |
1967 |
926 |
197.656 |
1968 |
660 |
-81.178 |
1969 |
608 |
-146.013 |
1970 |
653 |
-113.847 |
1971 |
888 |
108.318 |
1972 |
741 |
-51.516 |
1973 |
1102 |
296.649 |
1974 |
947 |
128.815 |
1975 |
920 |
88.980 |
1976 |
835 |
-8.854 |
1977 |
852 |
-4.689 |
1978 |
788 |
-81.523 |
1979 |
852 |
-30.358 |
1980 |
866 |
-29.192 |
1981 |
783 |
-125.027 |
1982 |
1046 |
125.139 |
1983 |
931 |
-2.696 |
1984 |
907 |
-39.530 |
1985 |
684 |
-275.365 |
1986 |
764 |
-208.199 |
1987 |
656 |
-329.034 |
1988 |
702 |
-295.868 |
1989 |
856 |
-154.703 |
1990 |
1133 |
109.463 |
1991 |
1132 |
95.628 |
1992 |
1298 |
248.794 |
1993 |
1176 |
113.959 |
1994 |
1082 |
7.125 |
1995 |
1235 |
147.290 |
1996 |
1173 |
72.456 |
1997 |
1148 |
34.621 |
1998 |
1449 |
322.787 |
1999 |
1340 |
200.952 |
2000 |
1075 |
-76.882 |
2001 |
1215 |
50.283 |
2002 |
934 |
-243.551 |
2003 |
1374 |
183.614 |
2004 |
1817 |
613.780 |
2005 |
1265 |
48.945 |
2006 |
1103 |
-125.889 |
2007 |
1096 |
-145.724 |
2008 |
1692 |
437.442 |
2009 |
1156 |
-111.393 |
2010 |
1282 |
1.773 |
2011 |
1691 |
397.938 |
2012 |
938 |
-367.896 |
2013 |
907 |
-411.731 |
2014 |
888 |
-443.565 |
Section 2:
To graph: The scatterplot of residual versus year.
Section 2:

Explanation of Solution
Graph: Construct a scatterplot using Minitab as follows:
Step 1: Enter the data in Minitab.
Step 2: Click on Graph --> Scatterplot. Select scatterplot with regression.
Step 3: Double click on ‘Residuals’ to move it to Y variable and ‘Year’ to move it to X variable column.
Step 4: Click ‘Ok’ to obtain the graph.
From the scatter plot, it is clear that the residual plot looks mostly random
(e)
To explain: That residuals are normal or not.
(e)

Answer to Problem 19E
Solution: The residuals are
Explanation of Solution
Graph: Construct the probability plot for residuals to test for the normality using Minitab as follows:
Step 1: Click on Stat -->
Step 2: Double click on ‘Residuals’ to move it to the variable column.
Step 3: Click ‘OK’ to obtain the graph.
Hence, the obtained graph is shown below:
Interpretation: All the points lie near the trend line. Therefore, it can be concluded that residuals are normally distributed.
(f)
To explain: The accuracy of inference based on residual checks.
(f)

Answer to Problem 19E
Solution: The inference can be made based on residuals.
Explanation of Solution
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 10 Solutions
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
- An electronics company manufactures batches of n circuit boards. Before a batch is approved for shipment, m boards are randomly selected from the batch and tested. The batch is rejected if more than d boards in the sample are found to be faulty. a) A batch actually contains six faulty circuit boards. Find the probability that the batch is rejected when n = 20, m = 5, and d = 1. b) A batch actually contains nine faulty circuit boards. Find the probability that the batch is rejected when n = 30, m = 10, and d = 1.arrow_forwardTwenty-eight applicants interested in working for the Food Stamp program took an examination designed to measure their aptitude for social work. A stem-and-leaf plot of the 28 scores appears below, where the first column is the count per branch, the second column is the stem value, and the remaining digits are the leaves. a) List all the values. Count 1 Stems Leaves 4 6 1 4 6 567 9 3688 026799 9 8 145667788 7 9 1234788 b) Calculate the first quartile (Q1) and the third Quartile (Q3). c) Calculate the interquartile range. d) Construct a boxplot for this data.arrow_forwardPam, Rob and Sam get a cake that is one-third chocolate, one-third vanilla, and one-third strawberry as shown below. They wish to fairly divide the cake using the lone chooser method. Pam likes strawberry twice as much as chocolate or vanilla. Rob only likes chocolate. Sam, the chooser, likes vanilla and strawberry twice as much as chocolate. In the first division, Pam cuts the strawberry piece off and lets Rob choose his favorite piece. Based on that, Rob chooses the chocolate and vanilla parts. Note: All cuts made to the cake shown below are vertical.Which is a second division that Rob would make of his share of the cake?arrow_forward
- Three players (one divider and two choosers) are going to divide a cake fairly using the lone divider method. The divider cuts the cake into three slices (s1, s2, and s3). If the choosers' declarations are Chooser 1: {s1 , s2} and Chooser 2: {s2 , s3}. Using the lone-divider method, how many different fair divisions of this cake are possible?arrow_forwardTheorem 2.6 (The Minkowski inequality) Let p≥1. Suppose that X and Y are random variables, such that E|X|P <∞ and E|Y P <00. Then X+YpX+Yparrow_forwardTheorem 1.2 (1) Suppose that P(|X|≤b) = 1 for some b > 0, that EX = 0, and set Var X = 0². Then, for 0 0, P(X > x) ≤e-x+1²² P(|X|>x) ≤2e-1x+1²² (ii) Let X1, X2...., Xn be independent random variables with mean 0, suppose that P(X ≤b) = 1 for all k, and set oσ = Var X. Then, for x > 0. and 0x) ≤2 exp Σ k=1 (iii) If, in addition, X1, X2, X, are identically distributed, then P(S|x) ≤2 expl-tx+nt²o).arrow_forward
- Theorem 5.1 (Jensen's inequality) state without proof the Jensen's Ineg. Let X be a random variable, g a convex function, and suppose that X and g(X) are integrable. Then g(EX) < Eg(X).arrow_forwardCan social media mistakes hurt your chances of finding a job? According to a survey of 1,000 hiring managers across many different industries, 76% claim that they use social media sites to research prospective candidates for any job. Calculate the probabilities of the following events. (Round your answers to three decimal places.) answer parts a-c. a) Out of 30 job listings, at least 19 will conduct social media screening. b) Out of 30 job listings, fewer than 17 will conduct social media screening. c) Out of 30 job listings, exactly between 19 and 22 (including 19 and 22) will conduct social media screening. show all steps for probabilities please. answer parts a-c.arrow_forwardQuestion: we know that for rt. (x+ys s ا. 13. rs. and my so using this, show that it vye and EIXI, EIYO This : E (IX + Y) ≤2" (EIX (" + Ely!")arrow_forward
- Theorem 2.4 (The Hölder inequality) Let p+q=1. If E|X|P < ∞ and E|Y| < ∞, then . |EXY ≤ E|XY|||X|| ||||qarrow_forwardTheorem 7.6 (Etemadi's inequality) Let X1, X2, X, be independent random variables. Then, for all x > 0, P(max |S|>3x) ≤3 max P(S| > x). Isk≤narrow_forwardTheorem 7.2 Suppose that E X = 0 for all k, that Var X = 0} x) ≤ 2P(S>x 1≤k≤n S√2), -S√2). P(max Sk>x) ≤ 2P(|S|>x- 1arrow_forwardarrow_back_iosSEE MORE QUESTIONSarrow_forward_ios
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman





