Bundle: Essentials Of Economics, Loose-leaf Version, 8th + Lms Integrated Mindtap Economics, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card
8th Edition
ISBN: 9781337368087
Author: N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 10, Problem 6QR
To determine
Application of coase theorem.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Anne has just purchased a new house in a lovely neighborhood. Her neighbors are friendly and even brought her house-warming gifts. Anne, however, has a problem. Her neighbors have cats, and Anne hates cats. Even though the city has a law requiring all outdoor pets to be on a leash, her neighbors ignore it, and the cats roam all over Anne's property.
How would an economist describe this situation? Is there anything Anne can do? Can you think of a Coase- like private solution?
Mike, Rosie, and Shobber live in separate houses along a dark and windy road. The following represent their marginal benefits for street lights:
MBMike=200-2QM
MBRosie=100-QR
MBShobber=100-2QS
where QM represents the quantity of street lights consumed by Mike, QR is the quantity of street lights consumed by Rosie and QS is the quantity of street lights consumed by Shobber. The Mayor of their town considers street lights to be a public good and is charged with purchasing the optimal number of street lights from Boone’s Light Shop. Boone’s is willing to sell street lights for $150 per light.
b. What quantity of street lights should the Mayor purchase? Why? Suppose the Mayor is able to implement a pricing scheme to charge users for the illumination services.
c. How much should each individual be charged? Does the tax revenue cover the total cost of providing the optimal number of streetlights?
15. Suppose a gated housing community includes 150 identical households. It is costly
to maintain the roads in the gated community. Suppose each household has a
marginal benefit MB = 200 – 25M for each mile of road maintained. The total
cost of maintaining roads is given by C = 20000M (MC=20000).
i. If the residents have to pay individually to maintain the roads in the vicinity
of their property, how many miles of roads will each household choose to
maintain on their own?
j. How many miles of roads should be maintained for the community
considering the public good nature of roads?
k. Suppose the community association could charge a flat fee to the
households to fund the maintenance of the roads. How much should this fee
be per household and what is the total cost of maintaining the socially
efficient level of this public good?
1. Draw the individual marginal benefit curves, overall marginal benefit and
the marginal cost curve. Identify and calculate the net social benefit of the
public…
Chapter 10 Solutions
Bundle: Essentials Of Economics, Loose-leaf Version, 8th + Lms Integrated Mindtap Economics, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card
Ch. 10.1 - Prob. 1QQCh. 10.2 - Prob. 2QQCh. 10.3 - Prob. 3QQCh. 10 - Prob. 1CQQCh. 10 - Prob. 2CQQCh. 10 - Prob. 3CQQCh. 10 - Prob. 4CQQCh. 10 - Prob. 5CQQCh. 10 - Prob. 6CQQCh. 10 - Prob. 1QR
Ch. 10 - Prob. 2QRCh. 10 - Prob. 3QRCh. 10 - Prob. 4QRCh. 10 - Prob. 5QRCh. 10 - Prob. 6QRCh. 10 - Prob. 1PACh. 10 - Prob. 2PACh. 10 - Greater consumption of alcohol leads to more motor...Ch. 10 - Prob. 4PACh. 10 - The many identical residents of Whoville love...Ch. 10 - Prob. 6PACh. 10 - Prob. 7PACh. 10 - Prob. 8PACh. 10 - Prob. 9PA
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose that two individuals, Jon and David, form a community and would like to construct a communal fort that would protect them from attacks. They consume both good X, a private good, and the protection from the fort, P. One unit of good X costs 1 unit while one unit of P costs 2 units, so the budget constraint for each is given by: Xi + 2Pi = 100. Both Jon and David have an income of 100 and a utility function of the form: U = log(Xi) + 2log(Pj + Pd) (a) How much protection, P, will be privately provided? What is optimal consumption of X, the private good? (b) What are the socially optimal amounts of protection, P, and consumption, X, of the private good? How do the socially optimal amounts compare to that privately provided? Explain why.arrow_forwardSuppose that two individuals, Jon and David, form a community and would like to construct a communal fort that would protect them from attacks. They both consume good X, a private good, and the protection of the fort, P. One unit of good X costs 1 unit of currency, and one unit of P costs 2 units of currency. Both Jon and David have an income of 100 and a utility function of the form: U = log(Xi) + 2 × log(PJ + PD)The budget constraint for each is given by:Xi + 2 × Pi = 100 (a) Find the amount of protection Jon will provide as a function of how much David provides, and explain why the relationship is the way it is.arrow_forwardFour individuals who live around a camp are hosting separate chirstmas parties, and all are considering purchasing aerial fireworks; any fireworks purchased will be set off over the camp, and thus will be visible to everyone at all of the parties. Karl’s marginal benefit from having an additional package of fireworks (which includes the benefit to himself and all of his guests) is given by MBK = 300 – 5Q, Jessica is given by MBJ = 600 – 10Q, Lara’s is given by MBL = 900 – 15Q, and Emily’s is given by MBE = 1,200 – 20Q, where Q is the total number of packages of fireworks set off at all parties. Each package of fireworks costs $800 (i.e., MC = 800). How many packages of fireworks will actually be set off if it is left to the free market? How much deadweight loss will result if this activity is left to the free market (as in part b)?arrow_forward
- Please see attachedarrow_forwardQuestion 7 You are a guitarist that plays for a heavy metal band. Once a week, the band meets at your house for practice. The enjoyment you get from the practice sessions are valued at $500. Your next-door neighbor is annoyed by all the noise caused by the band practice sessions. She enjoys her peace and quiet at a value of $350. If the neighbor has the right to a quiet neighborhood, which of the following is a possible outcome according to the Coase Theorem? Your neighbor pays you $500 to stop the practice sessions. You pay your neighbor $400 to stop complaining. You tell your neighbor that she is too quiet. Your neighbor continues to complain, and you continue playing.arrow_forwardWhat is the principal question Coase posits when it comes to negative externalities? Who should be allowed to inflict harm on whom? Who is morally correct in any given argument about harm? How large is the harm caused?arrow_forward
- Scenario 4 Suppose there are two residents in a neighborhood, Tana and Jason. Tana's demand for clean streets is Q = 100 – 4P. Jason's demand for clean streets is Q = 80 – 2P. If your answer is not a whole number, please make sure to round to the nearest hundredth. Refer to Scenario 4. What is the socially optimal number of clean streets if the marginal cost of cleaning them is $35? and what is the socially optimal number of clean streets if the marginal cost of cleaning them is $5?arrow_forwardQ.3. Externalities I Perhaps ironically, air conditioners produce heat as a waste product (to say nothing of any externalities from energy consumption). Air conditioner’s waste warm up nearby outdoor areas. This effect can be substantial in dense cities. Suppose that the following are the benefits/ costs from running an air conditioner on a 90 degree day (Q is the temperature reduction enjoyed by the consumer of the air conditioning): MPB=MSB=30-Q MPC=10 External Cost=5 a) Graph the private/social marginal benefit/cost curves described above. b) Determine the market equilibrium consumption of Q. c) Determine the socially optimal consumption level of Q. d) Calculate the consumer/producer surplus in b) and c). Calculate the deadweight loss in each, if applicable. e) What is the deal with producer surplus? f) Determine the tax that will yield the socially optimal consumption level. What is the revenue generated by the tax?arrow_forwardJill and Jack both have two pails that can be used to carry water down from a hill. Each makes only one trip down the hill, and each pail of water can be sold for $4. Carrying the pails of water down requires considerable effort. Both Jill and Jack would be willing to pay $2 each to avoid carrying one pail down the hill, and an additional $3 to avoid carrying a second pail down the hill.a. If Jack and Jill each must decide whether to carry one or two pails of water down from the top of the hill, how many pails will each child choose to carry? ___ pail(s)b. Jill and Jack’s parents are worried that the two children don’t cooperate enough with one another. Suppose they make Jill and Jack share equally their revenues from selling the water. Given that both are self-interested, construct the payoff matrix for the decisions Jill and Jack face regarding the number of pails of water each should carry. Carry 1 pail Jack Carry 2 pails…arrow_forward
- Jill and Jack both have two pails that can be used to carry water down from a hill. Each makes only one trip down the hill, and each pail of water can be sold for $5. Carrying the pails of water down requires considerable effort. Both Jill and Jack would be willing to pay $4 each to avoid carrying one pail down the hill, and an additional $4 to avoid carrying a second pail down the hill. a. If Jack and Jill each must decide whether to carry one or two pails of water down from the top of the hill, how many pails will each child choose to carry? 2 pail(s) b. Jill and Jack's parents are worried that the two children don't cooperate enough with one another. Suppose they make Jill and Jack share equally their revenues from selling the water. Given that both are self-interested, construct the payoff matrix for the decisions Jill and Jack face regarding the number of pails of water each should carry. Instructions: In the payoff matrix below, enter the payoffs for each child for each possible…arrow_forwardHarold smokes cigarettes but his office mate Kumar hates smoking. Harold and Kumar havethe following utility functions:UH = 100 + 10z – 0.1z2UK = 100 – 10z,where z is the number of cigarettes smoked by Harold (and UH includes the cost of cigarettes).Determine:a. The number of cigarettes smoked by Harold when the external effect on Kumar is ignored;b. The socially optimal number of cigarettes smoked. To find the socially optimal numberof cigarettes smoked, we create a social welfare function (SWF). The SWF is definedas the sum of Harold’s utility and Kumar’s utility. Using this approach, find the sociallyoptimal level of cigarettes that should be smoked by Harold;c. The Pigouvian tax needed to reach this social optimum;d. The outcome with Coasian bargaining when the property right is assigned Harold;e. The outcome with Coasian bargaining when the property right is assigned to Kumar.arrow_forwardIn a market with 2 firms, the government has decided that 12 units of pollution must be abated and allocates each firm 6 units of pollution to abate. The total cost of pollution abatement for firm A is TCĄ = 9% and the total cost of pollution abatement for firm B is TCB B. If a market for pollution abatement was created, how much pollution would each firm abate in equilibrium? Firm A: 11 units; Firm B: 1 units O Firm A: 6 units; Firm B: 6 units Firm A: 4 units; Firm B: 8 units O Firm A: 1 units; Firm B: 11 units Firm A: 8 units; Firm B: 4 unitsarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337091992
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning