(a)
To find: The
(a)
Answer to Problem 62E
Solution: The mean value of the ACT score is 21.133 and the mean value of the predicted value of ACT score is 21.162. Both the mean values are identical.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation: The predicted values can be obtained by using the referred Exercise 10.61.
The regression equation is
The predicted values for ACT corresponding to the SAT score of 1000 is calculated as shown below:
Similarly, obtain the predicted values for ACT corresponding to the remaining SAT scores as shown below:
Obs |
SAT |
Predicted values for ACT |
1 |
1000 |
23.03 |
2 |
1010 |
23.24 |
3 |
920 |
21.32 |
4 |
840 |
19.61 |
5 |
830 |
19.39 |
6 |
1440 |
32.45 |
7 |
490 |
12.12 |
8 |
1050 |
24.1 |
9 |
870 |
20.25 |
10 |
970 |
22.39 |
11 |
920 |
21.32 |
12 |
810 |
18.96 |
13 |
1080 |
24.74 |
14 |
1000 |
23.03 |
15 |
1030 |
23.67 |
16 |
870 |
20.25 |
17 |
880 |
20.46 |
18 |
850 |
19.82 |
19 |
780 |
18.32 |
20 |
830 |
19.39 |
21 |
1190 |
27.1 |
22 |
800 |
18.75 |
23 |
830 |
19.39 |
24 |
890 |
20.68 |
25 |
880 |
20.46 |
26 |
980 |
22.6 |
27 |
1030 |
23.67 |
28 |
1220 |
27.74 |
29 |
1080 |
24.74 |
30 |
970 |
22.39 |
31 |
1090 |
24.96 |
32 |
860 |
20.03 |
33 |
740 |
17.47 |
34 |
500 |
12.33 |
35 |
780 |
18.32 |
36 |
1120 |
25.6 |
37 |
590 |
14.26 |
38 |
990 |
22.82 |
39 |
700 |
16.61 |
40 |
930 |
21.53 |
41 |
860 |
20.03 |
42 |
420 |
10.62 |
43 |
800 |
18.75 |
44 |
1140 |
26.03 |
45 |
920 |
21.32 |
46 |
800 |
18.75 |
47 |
1040 |
23.89 |
48 |
840 |
19.61 |
49 |
1060 |
24.31 |
50 |
870 |
20.25 |
51 |
1120 |
25.6 |
52 |
800 |
18.75 |
53 |
960 |
22.17 |
54 |
880 |
20.46 |
55 |
1020 |
23.46 |
56 |
790 |
18.54 |
57 |
620 |
14.9 |
58 |
1150 |
26.24 |
59 |
970 |
22.39 |
60 |
1060 |
24.31 |
The mean value for the predicted values of ACT can be calculated as shown below:
With the help of Minitab, the mean of the ACT scores can be calculated as shown below:
Step 1: Enter the data into the worksheet of Minitab.
Step 2: Go to
Step 3: Go to statistics and select mean. Click on “OK” twice.
Hence, the required mean obtained is 21.133.
Interpretation: Therefore, it can be concluded that the mean value of the ACT score and the mean value of the predicted value of ACT score are identical.
(b)
To find: The standard deviation of the predicted values and its comparison with the standard deviation of the actual ACT scores.
(b)
Answer to Problem 62E
Solution: The standard deviation of the ACT score is 4.714 and the standard deviation of the predicted ACT scores is 3.854.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation: With the help of Minitab, the standard deviation of the ACT scores can be calculated as shown below:
Step 1: Enter the data into the worksheet of Minitab.
Step 2: Go to
Step 3: Go to statistics and select standard deviation. Click on “OK” twice.
Hence, the required standard deviation obtained is 4.714.
Use the predicted values of the ACT scores, which is obtained in the part (a). With the help of Minitab, the standard deviation of the predicted ACT scores or fitted values can be calculated as shown below:
Step 1: Enter the data of the predicted values of the ACT scores into the worksheet of Minitab.
Step 2: Go to
Step 3: Go to statistics and select standard deviation. Click on “OK” twice.
Hence, the required standard deviation obtained is 3.854.
Interpretation: Therefore, it can be concluded that the variability in the predicted ACT scores is less in comparison to the variability in the ACT scores.
(c)
To find: The SAT score for a student who is one standard deviation above the mean.
(c)
Answer to Problem 62E
Solution: The SAT score for a student who is one standard deviation above the mean is 1092.8.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation: With the help of Minitab, the mean of the SAT scores can be calculated as shown below:
Step 1: Enter the data into the worksheet of Minitab.
Step 2: Go to
Step 3: Go to statistics and select mean. Click on “OK” twice.
Hence, the required mean obtained is 912.7.
With the help of Minitab, the standard deviation of the SAT scores can be calculated as shown below:
Step 1: Enter the data into the worksheet of Minitab.
Step 2: Go to
Step 3: Go to statistics and select standard deviation. Click on “OK” twice.
Hence, the required standard deviation obtained is 180.1.
For
Interpretation: Therefore, it can be concluded that the predicted SAT score is 1092.8, which provides a standard score of about one by using the standard deviation of the predicted SAT scores.
To find: The predicted ACT score for a student who is one standard deviation above the mean and standardize this predicted ACT score.
Answer to Problem 62E
Solution: The required predicted ACT score is 25.02.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation: The predicted ACT score can be calculated as
Interpretation: Therefore, it can be concluded that the predicted ACT score is 25.02, which provides a standard score of about one by using the standard deviation of the predicted ACT scores.
(d)
To find: The SAT score for a student who is one standard deviation below the mean.
(d)
Answer to Problem 62E
Solution: The SAT score for a student who is one standard deviation below the mean is 732.6.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation: For
To find: The predicted ACT score for a student who is one standard deviation below the mean and standardize this predicted ACT score.
Answer to Problem 62E
Solution: The required predicted ACT score is 17.3.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation: For
The predicted ACT score is
(e)
To explain: The conclusions on the basis of part (c) and part (d).
(e)
Answer to Problem 62E
Solution: The standard score of the predicted value is same as the explanatory variable’s standard score for the parts (c) and (d).
Explanation of Solution
Therefore, it can be said that the standard score of the predicted value is the same as the explanatory variable’s standard score.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 10 Solutions
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics 9E & LaunchPad for Introduction to the Practice of Statistics 9E (Twelve-Month Access)
- You’re scrolling through Instagram and you notice that a lot of people are posting selfies. This piques yourcuriosity and you want to estimate the percentage of photos on Instagram that are selfies.(a) (5 points) Is there a “ground truth” for the percentage of selfies on Instagram? Why or why not?(b) (5 points) Is it possible to estimate the ground truth percentage of selfies on Instagram?Irrespective of your answer to the previous question, you decide to pull up n = 250 randomly chosenphotos from your friends’ Instagram accounts and find that 32% of these photos are selfies.(c) (15 points) Determine which of the following is an observation, a variable, a sample statistic (valuecalculated based on the observed sample), or a population parameter.• A photo on Instagram.• Whether or not a photo is a selfie.• Percentage of all photos on Instagram that are selfies.• 32%.(d) (5 points) Based on the sample you collected, do you think 32% is a reliable ballpark estimate for theground truth…arrow_forwardCan you explain this statement below in layman's terms? Secondary Analysis with Generalized Linear Mixed Model with clustering for Hospital Center and ICUvs Ward EnrolmentIn a secondary adjusted analysis we used generalized linear mixed models with random effects forcenter (a stratification variable in the primary analyses). In this analysis, the relative risk for the primaryoutcome of 90-day mortality for 7 versus 14 days of antibiotics was 0.90 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]0.78, 1.05).arrow_forwardIn a crossover trial comparing a new drug to a standard, π denotes the probabilitythat the new one is judged better. It is desired to estimate π and test H0 : π = 0.5against H1 : π = 0.5. In 20 independent observations, the new drug is better eachtime.(a) Find and plot the likelihood function. Give the ML estimate of π (Hint: youmay use the plot function in R)arrow_forward
- Can you explain what this analysis means in layman's terms? - We calculated that a target sample size of 3626, which was based on anticipated baseline 90-day mortality of 22% and a noninferiority margin of no more than 4 percentage points, would give the trial 80% power, at a one-sided alpha level of 2.5%, accounting for a maximum of 5% loss to follow-up and for early stopping rules for three interim analyses.-arrow_forwardCan you help me understand this analysis? A 95.7% confidence interval is shown for the intention-to-treat analysis (accounting for alpha spending in interim analyses), and 95% confidence intervals are shown for the other two analyses. The widths of the confidence intervals have not been adjusted for multiplicity. The dashed line indicates the noninferiority margin of 4 percentage points.arrow_forwardTitle: Analyzing Customer Satisfaction for UnileverAs a member of Unilever's Customer Experience Management team, you are responsible forevaluating customer satisfaction levels and monitoring competitive moves. This case studyinvolves analyzing satisfaction data to test two key hypotheses about Unilever's performancerelative to its main competitor, Procter & Gamble (P&G).Unilever’s leadership team has emphasized the importance of customer satisfaction inmaintaining competitive advantage and market leadership. As part of this initiative, yourteam regularly monitors satisfaction scores and benchmarks them against competitors likeP&G.You are tasked with analyzing the provided dataset to answer the following questions:1. Does Unilever’s average customer satisfaction score meet the minimum threshold of2. 75%?Is there no significant difference between Unilever’s overall average satisfaction scoreand P&G’s average satisfaction score?arrow_forward
- Need help answering wuestionarrow_forwardThe following table shows a data set containing information for 25 of the shadow stocks tracked by the American Association of Individual Investors (aaii.com, February 2002). Shadow stocks are common stocks of smaller companies that are not closely followed by Wall Street analysts. Click on the datafile logo to reference the data. DATA file Company DeWolfe Companies Exchange Ticker Symbol Market Cap ($ millions) Price/ Gross Profit Earnings Ratio Margin (%) AMEX DWL 36.4 8.4 36.7 North Coast Energy OTC NCEB 52.5 6.2 59.3 Hansen Natural Corp. OTC HANS 41.1 14.6 44.8 MarineMax, Inc. NYSE HZO 111.5 7.2 23.8 Nanometrics Incorporated OTC NANO 228.6 38.0 53.3 TeamStaff, Inc. OTC TSTF 92.1 33.5 4.1 Environmental Tectonics AMEX ETC 51.1 35.8 35.9 Measurement Specialties AMEX MSS 101.8 26.8 37.6 SEMCO Energy, Inc. NYSE SEN 193.4 18.7 23.6 Party City Corporation OTC PCTY 97.2 15.9 36.4 Embrex, Inc. OTC EMBX 136.5 18.9 59.5 Tech/Ops Sevcon, Inc. AMEX ΤΟ 23.2 20.7 35.7 ARCADIS NV OTC ARCAF 173.4…arrow_forwardThe following table shows a data set containing information for 25 of the shadow stocks tracked by the American Association of Individual Investors (aaii.com, February 2002). Shadow stocks are common stocks of smaller companies that are not closely followed by Wall Street analysts. Click on the datafile logo to reference the data. DATA file Company DeWolfe Companies Exchange AMEX Ticker Symbol Market Cap Price/ Gross Profit Earnings Margin ($ millions) Ratio (%) DWL 36.4 8.4 36.7 North Coast Energy OTC NCEB 52.5 6.2 59.3 Hansen Natural Corp. OTC HANS 41.1 14.6 44.8 MarineMax, Inc. NYSE HZO 111.5 7.2 23.8 Nanometrics Incorporated OTC NANO 228.6 38.0 53.3 TeamStaff, Inc. OTC TSTF 92.1 33.5 4.1 Environmental Tectonics AMEX ETC 51.1 35.8 35.9 Measurement Specialties AMEX MSS 101.8 26.8 37.6 SEMCO Energy, Inc. NYSE SEN 193.4 18.7 23.6 Party City Corporation OTC PCTY 97.2 15.9 36.4 Embrex, Inc. OTC EMBX 136.5 18.9 59.5 Tech/Ops Sevcon, Inc. AMEX ΤΟ 23.2 20.7 35.7 ARCADIS NV OTC ARCAF 173.4…arrow_forward
- The following data show the year to date percent change (YTD % Change) for 30 stock-market indexes from around the word (The Wall Street Journal, August 26, 2013). a. What index has the largest positive YTD % Change? Round your answer to once decimal place. index with a YTD % Change of % b. Using a class width of 5 beginning with -20 and going to 40, develop a frequency distribution for the data. YTD % Change Frequency -20 - -15 -15 - -10 -10 - -5 -5 - 0 0 - 5 5 - 10 10 - 15 15 - 20 20 - 25 30 - 35 c. 1. 2. 3. 4.arrow_forwardThe following data show the year to date percent change (YTD % Change) for 30 stock-market indexes from around the word (The Wall Street Journal, August 26, 2013). Click on the datafile logo to reference the data. DATA file Country Australia Index S&P/ASX200 YTD % Change 10.2 Belgium Bel-20 12.6 Brazil São Paulo Bovespa -14.4 Canada S&P/TSX Comp 2.6 Chile Santiago IPSA -16.3 China Shanghai Composite -9.3 Eurozone EURO Stoxx 10.0 France CAC 40 11.8 Germany DAX 10.6 Hong Kong Hang Seng -3.5 India S&P BSE Sensex -4.7 Israel Tel Aviv 1.3 Italy FTSE MIB 6.6 Japan Nikkei 31.4 Mexico IPC All-Share -6.4 Netherlands AEX 9.3 Singapore Straits Times -2.5 South Korea Kospi -6.4 Spain IBEX 35 6.4 Sweden Switzerland SX All Share 13.8 Swiss Market 17.4 Taiwan Weighted 2.3 U.K. FTSE 100 10.1 U.S. S&P 500 16.6 U.S. DJIA 14.5 U.S. Dow Jones Utility 6.6 U.S. Nasdaq 100 17.4 U.S. Nasdaq Composite 21.1 World DJ Global ex U.S. 4.2 World DJ Global Index 9.9 a. What index has the largest positive YTD %…arrow_forwardDescribe a three step process you choose to determine how many elementary schools there are in the city of 5 million people.arrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman