Bundle: ECON MICRO, 5th + Aplia, 1 term Printed Access Card
Bundle: ECON MICRO, 5th + Aplia, 1 term Printed Access Card
5th Edition
ISBN: 9781337192712
Author: William A. McEachern
Publisher: Cengage Learning
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 10, Problem 4.12P
To determine

Whether each of the following is a characteristic of perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and/or monopoly:

  1. A large number of sellers
  2. Product is a commodity
  3. Advertising by firms
  4. Barriers to entry
  5. Firms are price makers

Concept Introduction:

Perfect Competition: Perfect Competition describes a market structure in which the number of buyers and sellers is very large, and the competition among sellers is at its greatest possible level.

Monopolistic Competition: Monopolistic competition is a type of competition where producers offer products that are differentiated from one another (e.g. by quality).

Oligopoly: Oligopoly refers to a market which is dominated by a small number of large sellers (oligopolists). Oligopoly has its own market structure.

Monopoly: Monopoly refers to a market structure where there is a single seller who is engaged in selling a unique product in the market.

Blurred answer
Students have asked these similar questions
Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.
answer
Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student Edition
Economics
ISBN:9780078747663
Author:McGraw-Hill
Publisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co
Text book image
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781285165875
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
ECON MICRO
Economics
ISBN:9781337000536
Author:William A. McEachern
Publisher:Cengage Learning