(a)
If Earth’s tidal force would have been able to lift rocks off the lunar surface, when the Moon first coalesced by referring table 10-1.
(a)
Answer to Problem 23Q
Solution:
No, the tidal force of Earth on the rock would not have been sufficient to lift it off the Moon’s surface.
Explanation of Solution
Introduction:
According to the Collision ejection theory, the Moon was coalesced from the debris of Earth, when a Mars sized protoplanet collided with the proto-earth.
The tidal force exerted by Earth on the Moon is the result of the gravitational pull that it is exerting on the Moon. But, due to the tidal bulge on Earth, the Moon keeps receding away from it and this is the reason when the Moon first coalesced, it was at one tenth distance from Earth compared to present time.
The gravitational force between two bodies is given as:
Here,
Explanation:
Recall the expression for the gravitational pull exerted by Earth on a
Substitute
Similarly, the gravitational force exerted by the Moon on the rock to keep it on its surface is given as:
Substitute
Conclusion:
Since, the force exerted by the Moon on the rock is greater than the force exerted by Earth on the same rock. Therefore, the rock would not get off the Moon’s surface.
(b)
The comparison between the tidal forces that the Moon would experience due to Earth nowadays with the one that it experienced when it first coalesced.
(b)
Answer to Problem 23Q
Solution:
The tidal force on the Moon would have been 1000 times greater compared to the one which is experienced by it today.
Explanation of Solution
Introduction:
The tidal force experienced between two bodies is inversely proportional to the cube of the distance between the center of mass of the bodies. The force is expressed as:
Here,
Explanation:
Recall the expression for the tidal force experienced by the present day Moon due to Earth as:
Similarly, the expression, for the tidal force experienced by the Moon due to Earth when it first coalesced, is given as:
Take the ratio of the two expressions of forces as:
Refer the sub-part (a) of the problem and observe that the distance between Earth and the Moon was one-tenth of the present day and its value can be expressed as:
Hence, refer to the above calculation and write the expression for the ratio of the tidal forces as:
Conclusion:
Hence, the tidal force on the Moon when it first coalesced was 1000 times stronger compared to the one experienced by the modern day Moon.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 10 Solutions
Universe
- How can you determine the relative ages of the Moons maria and highlands?arrow_forwardDoes Marss surface experience any meteorite impacts today? How do you know?arrow_forwardLook at the map of the Hawaiian chain of islands on the right-hand page of the Concept Art: Volcanoes. Which island formed most recently? How do you know? Is the newly formed volcano of a type found on Venus, on Mars, on both planets, or on neither?arrow_forward
- How Do We Know? How can the flow of energy out of a planets interior affect its surface and atmosphere?arrow_forwardWhat is the escape velocity from the surface of an icy moon that has a diameter of 20 km? (Hint: Use the formula for escape velocity, Eq. 5-1b. The formula requires input quantities in kg and m.) (Notes: The density of ice is 1000 kg/m3. The volume of a sphere is 43r3.)arrow_forwardWould you expect as many impact craters per unit area on the surface of Venus as on the surface of Mars? Why or why not?arrow_forward
- What is the smallest-diameter crater you can identify in the photo of Mercury in Figure 2 of the Concept Art: Terrestrial and Jovian Planets? (Hint: See Appendix Table A-10, Properties of the Planets, to find the radius of Mercury in kilometers for scale.)arrow_forwardWhat are the difficulties with the capture hypothesis of the Moon’s origin?arrow_forwardWhy is it not surprising that there is no evidence of plate tectonics on Mercurys surface?arrow_forward
- Why isnt the crust of Mars broken into mobile plates as Earths crust is? How do you know?arrow_forwardLook at the right top and bottom images in Figure 20-2. Count the number of craters in each image. Based on your result, which portion of the Moons surface do you judge to be relatively older, and why? Figure 202 Details visible in photographs show that meteorite impacts covered the Moon with craters long ago, and then lava flooded out and filled the largest basins, covering the craters there with smooth plains.arrow_forwardHow does the large-impact hypothesis explain the Moons lack of iron?arrow_forward
- Foundations of Astronomy (MindTap Course List)PhysicsISBN:9781337399920Author:Michael A. Seeds, Dana BackmanPublisher:Cengage LearningAstronomyPhysicsISBN:9781938168284Author:Andrew Fraknoi; David Morrison; Sidney C. WolffPublisher:OpenStax
- An Introduction to Physical SciencePhysicsISBN:9781305079137Author:James Shipman, Jerry D. Wilson, Charles A. Higgins, Omar TorresPublisher:Cengage Learning