If a company has four lots of products for sale, purchase 1 (earliest) for $17, purchase 2 (middle) for $15, purchase 3 (middle) for $12, and purchase 4 (latest) for $14, which cost would be assumed to be sold first using LIFO costing? A. $17 B. $15 C. $12 D. $14
If a company has four lots of products for sale, purchase 1 (earliest) for $17, purchase 2 (middle) for $15, purchase 3 (middle) for $12, and purchase 4 (latest) for $14, which cost would be assumed to be sold first using LIFO costing? A. $17 B. $15 C. $12 D. $14
If a company has four lots of products for sale, purchase 1 (earliest) for $17, purchase 2 (middle) for $15, purchase 3 (middle) for $12, and purchase 4 (latest) for $14, which cost would be assumed to be sold first using LIFO costing?
A. $17
B. $15
C. $12
D. $14
Expert Solution & Answer
To determine
To identify:
The cost to be allocated in case of LIFO.
Introduction:
Last In First Out is a method of evaluation of cost of goods sold. In this method, it is assumed that units purchased at last is sold first. Costs in relation with units sold are taken from cost of last lot and in case, the sold units is higher than the latest lot purchased, then cost of last second lot is used.
Answer to Problem 1MC
The correct answer is d.
Explanation of Solution
d.
In case of LIFO, cost of sold uints are taken from the last lot purchased. In case, all the units from the last lot have been sold then cost of second last stock is applied for sale units. Thus, goods costing $14 would assumed to be sold first. Therefore, option d is correct.
a.
$17, would have been used in case of FIFO. Therefore, option a is incorrect.
b.
$15 cannot be used, until fourth and third lots are sold. Therefore, option b is incorrect.
c.
$12 cannot be used, until fourth lot has been sold. Therefore, option c is incorrect.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
PROBLEM E
Mulles, the owner of a successful fertilizer business, felt that it is time to expand operations. Mulles offered
to form a partnership with Lucena, the owner of a nearby warehouse. The partnership would be called
Mulles & Lucena Storage and Sales. Lucena accepted Mulles' offer and the partnership was formed on July
1,2024.
Presented below is the trial balance for Mulles Fertilizer Supply on June 30, 2024:
Cash
Accounts Receivable
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts.
Inventory
Prepaid Rent
Store Equipment
Accumulated Depreciation
Notes Payable
Accounts Payable
Mulles, Capital
Total
P 229,500
2,103,000
P 117,000
1,012,500
29,250
390,000
P3,764,250
97,500
330,000
505,500
2,714,250
P3,764,250
The partners agreed to share profits and losses equally and decided to invest an equal amount in the
partnership. Lucena and Mulles agreed that Lucena's land is worth P500,000 and his building P1,450,000.
Lucena is to contribute cash in an amount sufficient to make his capital account…
PLEASE HELP. ALL RED CELLS ARE INCORRECT. NOTICE, REVENUE ACCOUNTS ARE IN THE DROPDOWN!
Financial Accounting, Student Value Edition (5th Edition)
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.